Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 04:12, Larry Wall ha scritto:
[...]
: Problem solved!!! ;-)
I think you prove my point. :-)
Very nice certamen.
You would be probably thrilled by an italian Usenet poster I'm honoured
to know, who manually justifies every single post he writes. No extra
Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 04:12, Larry Wall ha scritto:
[...]
: Problem solved!!! ;-)
I think you prove my point. :-)
Very nice certamen.
You would be probably thrilled by an italian Usenet poster I'm honoured
to know, who manually justifies every single post he writes. No extra
Tom Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:01:11AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
: That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for the
Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 10:08, Stefano Rodighiero ha scritto:
[...]
Someone thinks Leonardo Serni is like Nicolad Bourbaki.
^^^
Oops. That was 'Nicolas'. Sorry.
Stefano
Damian Conway wrote:
Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
In the section He doth fill fields... we see an example of Fill
Justification where two spaces fit between every word. This doesn't
give us an idea of how spaces are distributed if the number of
spaces needed does not divide evenly into the number of
Richard Nuttall suggested:
An alternative is to have fill rightmost gaps and fill leftmost gaps on
alternate lines. This produces more balanced looking columns, so they
don't all look heavier on the left.
That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
For example:
Now is the
Damian Conway wrote:
Richard Nuttall suggested:
An alternative is to have fill rightmost gaps and fill leftmost
gaps on
alternate lines. This produces more balanced looking columns, so
they don't all look heavier on the left.
That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
The
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:01:11AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
: That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for the reader.
Ragged right is much easier on the
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:01:11AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
: That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for the reader.
Ragged right is much easier on the
Larry observed:
I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for the reader.
Well, it really depends on how neatly
one is able to write. It really isn't
that hard to create a fully justified
text that doesn't inflict pain
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:42:28PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
: Well, it really depends on how neatly
: one is able to write. It really isn't
: that hard to create a fully justified
: text that doesn't inflict pain on the
: reader. English is especially good in
: that regard, offering such a
In the section He doth fill fields... we see an example of Fill
Justification where two spaces fit between every word. This doesn't
give us an idea of how spaces are distributed if the number of
spaces needed does not divide evenly into the number of interstices.
In the section More particulars
Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
In the section He doth fill fields... we see an example of Fill
Justification where two spaces fit between every word. This doesn't
give us an idea of how spaces are distributed if the number of
spaces needed does not divide evenly into the number of interstices.
Currently
Damian --
Good. I don't remember where I first heard about doing it that way
vs. from the left, but the results going from the right to left
are typically better looking than from left to right, and I use that
way exclusively now.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 15:54, Damian Conway
14 matches
Mail list logo
