Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
Luke Palmer writes:
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following three liner:
If anyone has anything else, I have a page for this on the wiki.
What's not in the Parrot distribution?
http://www.vendian.org/parrot/wiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/ParrotExtrasTOC
On Wednesday, Oct 8, 2003, at 11:38 Europe/Berlin, Jos Visser wrote:
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's English. Mightn't is an archaic word which is sometimes
fun to use. Saying it
Luke Palmer writes:
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's English. Mightn't is an archaic word which is
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
Luke Palmer writes:
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's
Yes, Dan says we should track all know compilers as well
as the last know Parrot version compatibility. I'll assume 0.0.11 for now
unless anyone tells me otherwise.
-Melvin
At 11:38 AM 10/8/2003 +0200, Jos Visser wrote:
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
There it goes again! That was *supposed* to be off-list!
Well, now the entirety of the internals list can learn about English
grammar. Hoo-ray.
You mean American Grammar. I'm pretty
