On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:08:02PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 1:52 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS * Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
DS * Objects have methods you can call
DS * Objects have
At 10:22 AM -0500 3/10/03, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:07:46PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
* Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
* Objects have methods you can call
* Objects have attributes you can fetch
* You can fetch a hash of all the
At 8:25 AM + 3/10/03, Graham Barr wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:08:02PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 1:52 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS * Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
DS * Objects have
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:07:46PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
* Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
* Objects have methods you can call
* Objects have attributes you can fetch
* You can fetch a hash of all the properties
* When fetching or storing a generic property, you
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 6:53 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
anything:
[...]
Am I reading
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so any class X that inherits from B must also modify the PARENT property
in B? that sounds like PARENT is a hash of the classes which inherit
from B.
DS Yep. Basically if the inheriting class is of a different type, such that
DS the
At 8:01 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 6:53 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a
At 3:05 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so any class X that inherits from B must also modify the PARENT property
in B? that sounds like PARENT is a hash of the classes which inherit
from B.
DS Yep. Basically if the inheriting class is
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
anything:
Objects
===
* Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
* Objects have methods you can call
* Objects have attributes you can fetch
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS * Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
DS * Objects have methods you can call
DS * Objects have attributes you can fetch
and store
DS * You can fetch a hash of all the properties
DS * When fetching or storing a
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
anything:
[...]
Am I reading it right if I reckon that a Class isa Object? and an
Object hasa Class (assuming that
At 6:53 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
anything:
[...]
Am I reading it right if I reckon that a Class isa
At 1:52 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS * Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
DS * Objects have methods you can call
DS * Objects have attributes you can fetch
and store
Well... I'm not sure about that. Classes can
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS At 1:52 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS is done with a PARENT property on the
on the what?
DS The delegated object. D'oh!
DS So if class A isa B, and B is a perl 5 hash-object-thingie, the object
DS that B creates would
14 matches
Mail list logo
