Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-30 Thread Udo Güngerich
Am Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2006 03:18 schrieb Ruud H.G. van Tol: > Thomas Wittek schreef: > > > > What I wanted to say is that it would annoy me, if almost all > > operators and control-flow keywords are lowercase but a hand full of > > them has to be written uppercase. Hi, I suppose the above is a s

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-25 Thread Ruud H.G. van Tol
Thomas Wittek schreef: > Actually I don't know all of them but most seem to be (part of) > identifiers, not operators. Of course they are reserved words. > > What I wanted to say is that it would annoy me, if almost all > operators and control-flow keywords are lowercase but a hand full of > them

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-25 Thread Thomas Wittek
Markus Laire schrieb: >> Operators/reserved words should be lowercase. Period. ;) >> I think that this would heavily break consistency, annoying new users. > > There are already many uppercase reserved words in perl6: > > Pseudo-packages from S02 > MY, OUR, GLOBAL, OUTER, CALLER, CONTEXT, SUPER,

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-25 Thread jerry gay
On 7/25/06, Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bearing that in mind, would the eye-socket-burning > > return $foo > IF $something; > > really be so bad? Operators/reserved words should be lowercase. Period. ;) I think that this would heavily break consistency, annoying new users.

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-25 Thread Markus Laire
On 7/25/06, Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bearing that in mind, would the eye-socket-burning > > return $foo > IF $something; > > really be so bad? Operators/reserved words should be lowercase. Period. ;) I think that this would heavily break consistency, annoying new users.

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-25 Thread Thomas Wittek
> Bearing that in mind, would the eye-socket-burning > > return $foo > IF $something; > > really be so bad? Operators/reserved words should be lowercase. Period. ;) I think that this would heavily break consistency, annoying new users. -Thomas

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-24 Thread Kris Shannon
On 7/22/06, Aaron Crane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Wall writes: > Maybe we should just make statement modifiers uppercase and burn out > everyone's eye sockets. :) ... Bearing that in mind, would the eye-socket-burning return $foo IF $something; really be so bad? This has

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-24 Thread Paul Hodges
I know, shoot me -- but just so we've discussed it and put it to bed, maybe :if or _if or fi? --- Aaron Crane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Larry Wall writes: > > Maybe we should just make statement modifiers uppercase and burn > out > > everyone's eye sockets. :) > > I like statement modifie

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-22 Thread Aaron Crane
Larry Wall writes: > Maybe we should just make statement modifiers uppercase and burn out > everyone's eye sockets. :) I like statement modifiers, and I want them to continue to exist in Perl 6. But it seems to me that a lot of the most awkward decisions about Perl 6 syntax are awkward precisely b

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-21 Thread Trey Harris
In a message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Ruud H.G. van Tol writes: Larry Wall schreef: Maybe we should just make statement modifiers uppercase and burn out everyone's eye sockets. :) Or maybe { }. while $x ; Actually, can't that be made to work already (already by the language spec, not

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-21 Thread Ruud H.G. van Tol
Larry Wall schreef: > Maybe we should just make statement modifiers > uppercase and burn out everyone's eye sockets. :) Or maybe { }. while $x ; -- Groet, Ruud

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-21 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:07:52PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: : Or just give them some sort of syntactic marker ... I know! : : loop { : ... : } : :while $loopy; : : eat :if $hungry; : go_postal :when $aggravation > 10; : .sleep :until .rested; : : *Everybo

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-21 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:18:57AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > It ain't easy. Maybe we should just make statement modifiers uppercase > and burn out everyone's eye sockets. :) Or just give them some sort of syntactic marker ... I know! loop { ... } :while $loopy; eat :if

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-21 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 05:03:32PM +0100, Smylers wrote: : Markus Laire writes: : : > S04 seems to say that a style like this can't be used by : > perl6-programmers: : > : > loop : > { : >... : > } : > while $x; : > : > I like this style, as it lines up both the keywords and the curlies. :

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-21 Thread Markus Laire
On 7/20/06, Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Markus Laire writes: > S04 seems to say that a style like this can't be used by > perl6-programmers: > > loop > { >... > } > while $x; > > I like this style, as it lines up both the keywords and the curlies. As of yesterday you can get very c

Re: S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-20 Thread Smylers
Markus Laire writes: > S04 seems to say that a style like this can't be used by > perl6-programmers: > > loop > { >... > } > while $x; > > I like this style, as it lines up both the keywords and the curlies. As of yesterday you can get very close to this by putting a space-eating backslas

S04 - forbidden coding-style

2006-07-20 Thread Markus Laire
This quote from S04 Outside of any kind of expression brackets, a final closing curly on a line (not counting whitespace or comments) always reverts to the precedence of semicolon whether or not you put a semicolon after it. (In the absence of an explicit semicolon, the current statement may cont