Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote: I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it? I am converting my old tests directly to

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
Michael G Schwern wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote: I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it? I am converting

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 12:56:27PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: There's no I want to add a new test to this test file that uses Test.pm and it would be nice if I could use Test::Foo case? I could see this being really good for Apache-Test, which is by default Test.pm driven. the thing is

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
But for all Test::Builder based modules you can get the same intent with Test::Builder-reset. yup, I used that for the port away from Test.pm - works like a charm :) --Geoff

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Tels wrote: Granted, that was what I did before Test::Legacy, which seems to have gone from a wild idea to some working stage while I was not looking :) Most of it was written in about an hour and a half late one night with another hour worth of

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue 21 Dec 2004 18:32, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote: I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody using it? Anybody tried migrating old

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote: I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it? I am converting my old tests directly to Test::More

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Tuesday 21 December 2004 18:32, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote: I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody using

Re: Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Tuesday 21 December 2004 19:35, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Tels wrote: Granted, that was what I did before Test::Legacy, which seems to have gone from a wild idea to some working stage while I was not

Test::Legacy warnock'd

2004-12-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it? -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ I'm crazy but I get the job done.