On Friday, Oct 24, 2003, at 14:23 Europe/London, Andrew Savige wrote:
I'm about to add a POD test program to my phalanx distro.
Before I do that, just want to check I'm using the best model.
I plan on using the one from WWW::Mechanize (shown below) --
unless someone can suggest a better model.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:17:24PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
This may be a dim question but why scan blib and lib?
[snip]
my $blib = File::Spec-catfile(qw(blib lib));
[snip]
That's not blib and lib, that's a cross platform way of saying:
my $blib = 'blib/lib';
Wouldn't everything
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 12:25:45PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
Your version does not work (unless I've had a brain malfunction):
No, I had the brain malfunction. I forgot that and has an even lower
precedence than = so the expression comes out as:
(my $have_testpod = !$@) and
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 04:45:48PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
Michael G Schwern wrote:
Since skip_all will exit immediately you can fold that big everything
inside the else block away.
eval 'use Test::Pod';
my $have_testpod = !$@ and $Test::Pod::VERSION = 0.95;
plan skip_all =
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 04:45:48PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
There is a misprint in this line:
my $have_testpod = !$@ and $Test::Pod::VERSION = 0.95;
It should read:
my $have_testpod = !$@ $Test::Pod::VERSION = 0.95;
I deliberately used and instead of .
Michael G Schwern wrote:
Since skip_all will exit immediately you can fold that big everything
inside the else block away.
eval 'use Test::Pod';
my $have_testpod = !$@ and $Test::Pod::VERSION = 0.95;
plan skip_all = Test::Pod v0.95 required for testing POD
unless $have_testpod;
my
I'm about to add a POD test program to my phalanx distro.
Before I do that, just want to check I'm using the best model.
I plan on using the one from WWW::Mechanize (shown below) --
unless someone can suggest a better model.
Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
such a
Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
such a beast: 99-pod.t/99_pod.t/99.pod.t/99pod.t?
Personally, I'd just as soon not have it be one of the numeric ones. It
doesn't matter what order it's run in.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com =
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:23:52PM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
such a beast: 99-pod.t/99_pod.t/99.pod.t/99pod.t?
Probably not worth the inevitable argument.
use Test::More;
use File::Spec;
use File::Find;
use strict;
eval {
