Re: What's needed for a new languages/t/*?

2005-08-07 Thread Amir Karger
[Argh! Posted to google groups again!] Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote: Amir Karger schrieb: I have a test script that runs 85 tests (and will run many more once I write more opcodes. So if all I want to do is, essentially, perl -e 'chdir languages/Z and system(parrot z3.imc t/test.z3)'

Re: What's needed for a new languages/t/*?

2005-08-05 Thread chromatic
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 08:52 -0400, Amir Karger wrote: I'm about to commit an updated version of leo's Z-code-to-PIR translator. I'm wondering what I should do about t. I hope to have a variant of Test::More written in pure PIR in the near future (though it probably requires the new calling

What's needed for a new languages/t/*?

2005-08-04 Thread Amir Karger
I'm about to commit an updated version of leo's Z-code-to-PIR translator. I'm wondering what I should do about t. I have a test script that runs 85 tests (and will run many more once I write more opcodes. Luckily, I developed it already when I was doing plotz). I could easily modify it to output

Re: What's needed for a new languages/t/*?

2005-08-04 Thread Will Coleda
Excellent questions. Perhaps I can whip up a languages.pod once 0.2.3 is out the door, based on partcl and the current state of a few other languages out there. Right now, the unified language testing harness, such as it is, would rather you had a script called harness that took a --files

Re: What's needed for a new languages/t/*?

2005-08-04 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
Amir Karger schrieb: I have a test script that runs 85 tests (and will run many more once I write more opcodes. Luckily, I developed it already when I was doing plotz). I could easily modify it to output ok n and not ok with a comment about what went wrong. However, because it's a big Z-code