[CVS ci] (was: NULL (was Re: cvs commit: parrot interpreter.c stacks.c))

2002-11-10 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Nicholas Clark wrote: It's not likely to be a portability problem, To NULL or not to NULL, this is the question. I introduced a macro, depending on a symbol HAS_NON_ZERO_NULL, which should be set for these architecures. Currently interpreter.c only, other files

Re: [CVS ci] (was: NULL (was Re: cvs commit: parrot interpreter.c stacks.c))

2002-11-10 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:15:06PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: Nicholas Clark wrote: It's not likely to be a portability problem, To NULL or not to NULL, this is the question. I introduced a macro, depending on a symbol HAS_NON_ZERO_NULL, which should

Parrot Builds broken for Win32?

2002-11-10 Thread Clinton A. Pierce
Grabbing the last few snapshots from dev.perl.org, I can't find one that'll build under Win32. During Configure.PL I get these errors: Determining stack growth direction...'.\test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or extern al command, operable program or batch file. Odd number of elements

Quick roadmap

2002-11-10 Thread Dan Sugalski
Okay, I survived this year's Lightweight Languages workshop, and as part of the aftermath I have a roadmap. These are the things going in, and in the order they're going in: *) Exceptions. (Adding the cope and hcf instructions for them) *) A better C function call interface. (And an incredibly