> t/pmc/nci.t doesn't like me or, at least, it doesn't like the way I
> don't have a lrint in my . My K&R claims that everything in
> math.h ought to return a double (well, anything you can validly expect
> to find in every math.h), so using math.so is probably not the way to
> test the nci, inste
# New Ticket Created by Alex Gough
# Please include the string: [perl #18762]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18762 >
t/pmc/nci.t doesn't like me or, at least, it doesn't like the way I
don't have a lrint in
>Would it also be your job to do porting of subversion to VMS, so that we
>could consider replacing CVS with something that lets clients do directory
>moves? :-)
Sadly, no. :)
But I can tell you that I am actively investigating the use of
subversion for future use on perl.org projects. We're st
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:14:39AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> Nicholas Clark writes:
> >This seems to be a good idea. I'd commit it, except that it needs more
> >than commit access to move a directory with CVS. Who has enough shell
> >access to cvs.perl.org to do this? [assuming it does want to
At 9:00 PM + 11/28/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
Also, at the moment I can't test this
OK, I've had a go. I'm basing the following on the code you mentioned
at http://use.perl.org/~Elian/journal/9147 (of course, you should know
better than
At 9:00 PM + 11/28/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Loaded...
dlfunced...
../parrot: relocation error: /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0: undefined
symbol: pthread_mutexattr_init
Well, the C code on the page works fine, but of course you have to
link it with -lpthread. How would I do this for the parrot code
Jerome Quelin wrote:
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 17:18, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Then what should I use for a 2D array?
The example (test) is an 2D array.
So, a so-called MultiArray is in fact one array, but the first n elems
are the elems of the 1st line, the next n elems are the 2nd line
At 3:35 PM -0800 11/27/02, Bryan Hundven wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Bryan Hundven wrote:
Bryan,
you should suggest it on the perl6-internals mailinglist where
parrot development is happening. :-)
-ask
I don't know if anyone at parrotcode has thought of this idea, or
implemented it as a te
Nicholas Clark writes:
>On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Jerome Quelin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would it be possible to rename the $PARROT/languages/Befunge-93
>> directory into $PARROT/languages/befunge ?
>> Indeed, as soon as parrot will support objects, I'll implement the
>> befunge 98
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 17:18, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays?
> multiarrays are mainly intended for huge packed multi dim arrays.
Then what should I use for a 2D array?
> > ... What are the
> > limitations of multiarrays? I've read in classe
Jerome Quelin wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to use multi-arrays, but I can't understand how they're
working. I looked at $PARROT/t/pmc/multiarray.t, but it's a bit
obscure.
underdocumented
Could you help me to understand them please? Or are they deprecated?
Yes/No
Should I use something else
Hi,
I'd like to use multi-arrays, but I can't understand how they're
working. I looked at $PARROT/t/pmc/multiarray.t, but it's a bit
obscure.
Could you help me to understand them please? Or are they deprecated?
Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays? What are the
limitations of m
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to rename the $PARROT/languages/Befunge-93
> directory into $PARROT/languages/befunge ?
> Indeed, as soon as parrot will support objects, I'll implement the
> befunge 98 specs, and the same interprete
Jürgen Bömmels (via RT) wrote:
I just hacked imcc to accept normal pasm files. About 85% of the test
are still working, and its a major speed improvement. On my K6-350 I
get the following timings:
This is a speed improvement of about 350%.
Superb
The remaining failing tests
are mostly be
Brent Dax wrote:
Dan Sugalski:
# which builds up a native call pmc that can be invoked. .
Oh JITters... ;^)
Here we go. "d" and "i" signatures currently, but it's easy to add more.
It passes the 2 (new) tests.
Currently, it's not integrated, add these lines to nci.c
#define CAN_BUILD_CALL
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #18747]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18747 >
Hi,
I just hacked imcc to accept normal pasm files. About 85% of the test
are still w
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #18745]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18745 >
This config test looks if the fucomip instruction is available.
Question is, should
If memory serves me right, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Loaded...
> dlfunced...
> ../parrot: relocation error: /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0: undefined symbol:
>pthread_mutexattr_init
>
I don't know if this is twisting the knife in the wound ... but it works
for me ...
[gopal@mushroom parrot]$ perl assemble
Recent changes to jit:
Register usage is now kept in an array per register type and is
calculated for non jitted sections too.
Register usage can be per section (a sequence of either jitted or
nonjitted ops not separated by branches) or per basic block. This
allows later to avoid some register lo
19 matches
Mail list logo
