Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I think we need to rethink the wrapping technology (which I
> introduced). Something like:
> struct parrot_io_t {
> PObj pobj;
> UINTVAL flags;
> PIOHANDLE fd;
> ...
> };
> But this needs to allocate garbage-collected memory of
> sizeof(str
At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:20:50 +0300,
Vladimir Lipsky wrote:
>
> If it blocks the automated test builds, then just turning the box off is
> okay. It must be admitted that, the truth is that I don't know anybody
> who does send those reports
More important -- is the Segfault reported in any other ma
> I think separating the IMCC and parrot programming FAQs, or making the
> IMCC faq a section of a larger Parrot FAQ, would be better. The IMCC FAQ
> really ought to be about syntax rather than semantics.
Patches welcome.
:-J
-R
If it blocks the automated test builds, then just turning the box off is
okay. It must be admitted that, the truth is that I don't know anybody
who does send those reports
0x4C56
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Do Steve Fink's debugging for him
Steve Fink had a problem with some generated code throwing a segfault
when it was run and, having hit the debugging wall himself, posted the
code to the list and asked help. Leo tracked down the bug in Parrot and
fixed it.
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #24553]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24553 >
Hi,
when checking up on 'imcfaq.pod' I noticed that this file wasn't mentioned
The Perl 6 Summary for the fortnight ending 20031123
Right, hopefully things are back to normal(ish) after the disk crashes
that rather spoilt the last summary. I've managed to fill in my mail
archive too so this summary will cover the events of the last fortnight
(that's two weeks
It my fault. I was messing around with labels. I have a pending
patch to clarify some more things in the API so for now we just
need to disable the imcc/t/imcpasm tests.
Global labels get fixup and are loaded into global table by packfile.
The local labels don't need to be globals.
-Melvin
J
Hi,
the test in imcc/t/imcpasm/{pcc,optc}.t are currently failing. First I
thought this was a problem with my setup because most tinderbox were
green. It took me a while until I found out that they also fail, but
you need to look in the logs to see it. Is there a bug in the
tinderbox-code?
Anyway
At 05:03 PM 11/25/2003 +0100, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In PIO_open the ParrotIO object never gets created if there is
> an error condition.
But PIO_open returns a valid IO-PMC which just has a NULL in its data
segment. Maybe it should return PMCNULL if the
Folks,
I just committed a patch to disable the "Your program has crashed, want to
send a report to Microsoft" box that pops up on Win32 when Parrot
segfaults -- it blocks the automated test builds which as you might expect
happens with some regularity. :) However I'm not sure if this ought be the
"Thies C. Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hiya,
>
> still working onm this php-compiler;-)
> thanx for all the replies on my last issue..
>
> next question: calling conventions.
> in the calling_convertion.pod you say that the callee should
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 11:45 AM 11/24/2003 +0300, Vladimir Lipsky wrote:
> >Hi everyone!
> >
> >In t/src/io.c, specifically test 9 and 10, I wonder if the PIO_eof check up
> >works anywhere; because I didn't manage to find any place where the
> >PIO_F_EOF flag is set up when
"Vladimir Lipsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey unix folks, does test 10 in t/src/io.t succed on your OS?
Yes, I just tested it again.
patch applied.
boe
--
Juergen Boemmels[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fachbereich Physik Tel: ++49-(0)631-205-2817
Universit
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> >> In the mean time I've checked in freeze/thaw for PerlHash. It uses an
> >> element count as list does. We could of course use your proposed scheme
> >
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
> We DO need a Parrot Programming FAQ. I propose the IMCC faq functions
> as just that. We can still have the current Parrot FAQ, which is
> great at answering generic questions for people who haven't swallowed
> the blue pill yet. (Or was it the red pill,
> Currently it isn't prohibitied. That is the only way to detect an error
> from PIO_open* at this time.
io = PIO_open(interpreter, NULL, file[i], flags[j]);
if ( (PIO_eof(interpreter, io) ? 0:1) != expected[i][j] )
{
0x4c56
Hey unix folks, does test 10 in t/src/io.t succed on your OS?
0x4c56
io_win32.diff
Description: Binary data
18 matches
Mail list logo
