Hi!
I like the idea of leveraging the wxPerl XS files. Any comments on why
you introduced xsubppp (on top of xsubpp) for some XS files?
XS++ is much less verbose than plain XS when writing
C++ code [1], and it allows me to handle some C++ features
(like passing/returning references) without
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:33:50 +0200 Christian Renz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
How do I find the right symbol name for a function? For example, the
void wxBell(void) function can be found in the library as __Z6wxBellv
(found using otool -vT /usr/lib/libwx.dylib), but I guess on Windows
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:09:46 +0200 Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattia Barbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
this patch implements Parrot_call_method (with test).
This code seems to duplicate functions from Fsrc/inter_run.c and
returning results from the call is missing
Hello,
should they be? I think they are covered by the statemente in
pdd11 (... about the same level of access to Parrot
that bytecode programs ...).
Regards
Mattia
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:36:43 -0400 Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 6:44 PM +0200 8/21/04, Mattia Barbon wrote:
Hello,
I think extenders should have access to at least some of the
flags in PObj_enum. Should we have a different function for
each flag (say
Hello,
crrently argument count is passed in I3. A comment in untils.c
near foldup says that:
TODO - IMCC and PDD 3 aren't yet in conformance. This uses the current
IMCC setup, but should be changed as soon as IMCC modified to the
correct calling conventions.
while pdd03 says:
Hello,
I think extenders should have access to at least some of the
flags in PObj_enum. Should we have a different function for
each flag (say: Parrot_PObj_set_custom_mark(INTERP, PMC, value),
Parrot_PObj_set_is_class(INTERP, PMC, value) or a single
Parrot_PObj_set_flag(INTERP, PMC, flag, value)
[got a failure, sorry if this is a duplicate]
On 15 Aug 2004 10:11:11 - Leopold Toetsch via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattia Barbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure about this patch. It splits part of Parrot_load_lib
into a Parrot_init_lib(Interp, load_func_ptr
Il Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:42:20 -0500 Gordon Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On Saturday, January 24, 2004, at 11:28 , Mattia Barbon wrote:
I feel I'm becoming annoying, but: the embedding and extending
interfaces are still using different names for
Parrot_Interp/Parrot_INTERP
Hello,
I feel I'm becoming annoying, but: the embedding and extending
interfaces are still using different names for Parrot_Interp/Parrot_INTERP.
Which one is correct?
Thanks!
Mattia
Il Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:43:42 +0100 Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Mattia Barbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
this patch
* renames Parrot_INTERP and Parrot_STRING to Parrot_Interp and
Parrot_String,
which matches the rest of Parrot types, as well as the
embedding
Hello,
I have some questions about which part of the actual headers are
internal, which ones are for embedders and which ones are for
extenders.
AFAIR nothing but Parrot sources should #include parrot/parrot.h.
The public interface is available through parrot/embed.h and
parrot/extend.h.
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 17:59:36 +0200 Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:10 +0200 7/31/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
*) Determine the init and setup routine names
- Parrot_classname_class_setup
- Parrot_classname_class_init
The class_setup
Hello,
the correct fix is probably having different code paths for Win32 (because
on Windows NT/2000/XP/.Net and funnier names of the future environment
is/will be Unicode, not char*). For now this makes env.t pass on Win32.
Regards
Mattia
parrot.cvs.diff
Description: Binary data
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:56:54 +0200 Aldo Calpini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stumbled upon this because I'm trying to implement an
Iterator PMC (almost done), and the most obvious way I've
found to bind the iterator to what it should iterate is this
one:
new P0, .PerlHash
new P1,
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Sean O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few more tweaks:
- inline and remove _to_keyed and _to_keyed_integer.
- inline pack_op
- reorder the big elsif to test for /^\[/ once at the top, then only
match
against keyed/non-keyed.
At this point,
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:50:25 +0200 Aldo Calpini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr. Nobody wrote:
The windows 9x command.com shell dosen't recognize
21 so it ends up passing 2 as an argument to the
compiler, which fails because there's no such file.
this is no news. you can't even build Perl
The following patch adds a Parrot_nosegfault() function
to win32.c; after it is called, a segmentation fault will print
This process received a segmentation violation exception
instead of popping up a dialog. I think it might be useful
for tinderbox clients.
Regards
Mattia
Index:
The following patch adds a Parrot_nosegfault() function
to win32.c; after it is called, a segmentation fault will print
This process received a segmentation violation exception
instead of popping up a dialog. I think it might be useful
for tinderbox clients.
Please notice, stdio is
FYI: On interp init I already grab the standard handles (io_win32.c) so you
could reuse the value for stderr. It might make sense to make the low level
handle values extern so other modules can use them. Let me know and
I'll put a patch in for it.
I don't know if it is a good idea to expose
misc.c, line 541: Error:
[ISO 6.1.4]: End of line in string literal.
Here's a patch. That last one is particularly odd, as it is in a #if 0.
I'm leaving it for now, as I think this is a case of the compiler being on
crack.
Probably not: IIRC the standard requires the parts inside
I'm sorry if this is a known bug.
my.pasm ( useless, just a contrived example ):
set I1, 12
FOO:
if I1, FOO
BAR:
if I1, BAR
if I1, FOO
end
assembly:
0x816bda8: push %ebp
0x816bda9: mov%esp,%ebp
0x816bdab: int3
0x816bdac: movl
io/io_win32.c:
according to my MSVC docs, you should use _tcslen only after
#including tchar.h
Index: io/io_win32.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/io/io_win32.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -2 -r1.2 io_win32.c
---
Makefile.in:
(Re)add ld_debug flags to LDFLAGS, so that Configure.pl --debugging
works with MSVC
classes/Makefile.in
make easier to add pmb2c.pl flags to all pmc2c calls
Index: Makefile.in
===
RCS file:
key.c:
intialize KEY.keys
classes/perlarray.c:
* get_string: is casting SELF-cache.struct_val to a STRING*,
while all other methods are using it as a KEY*; don't know
what a perlarray stringifies to, so replacing with NULL
* get_bool: the default behaviour does not look right to me
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Brent Dax wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to utilize it. Including
windows.h causes a conflict with Parrot's definition of BOOL, including
winbase.h gives me a ton of syntax errors, and putting the declaration
It is not supported to #include a win* file unless
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:45:49PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 03:43:57PM -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
I just fixed the dependancy. Hopefully, this problem goes away now.
Nope.
Fixed it up, and also fixed some problems with the clean target.
Any volunteers
I just uploaded a new version of Parrot::Smoke to CPAN.
Changes:
0.02 Fri Oct 05 06:57:20 2001
- support for sending mail through Net::SMTP
- autonfiguration through Makefile.PL should work
on Win32
- eliminated --define/--defaults from output
Regards
Mattia
Automated smoke report for patch Oct 4 07:00:01 2001 UTC
v0.01 on dec_osf using gcc version 2.8.1
O = OK
F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
? = still running or test results not (yet) available
Build failures during: - = unknown
c = Configure, m = make, t =
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 09:34:17 +0200
From: Barbon Mattia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Parrot Smoke Oct 2 01:00:02 2001 UTC dec_osf 4.0
Automated smoke report for patch Oct 2 01:00:02 2001 UTC
v0.01 on dec_osf using
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote:
Attached is a new assemble.pl. No, it doesn't change anything, it only
breaks the code up into easier to follow functions (which are commented). I
After looking at the old assembler code: Thanks!
am going to test it on a few more platforms and
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Buggs wrote:
===
Win32
make ok / test ok
(with caveats: nmake doesn't do 'test' correctly, and 'clean' doesn't
work because of the 'rm' command)
use namke -a [1]; for the rm problem I posted a patch some time ago,
and Andy Dougherty posted anoter one about
of say 12,
and if I change the assembly from 0b1100 to 12, the test passes )
I din't try the new assembler.
Mattia
-Original Message-
From: Mattia Barbon
To: Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Sent: 9/26/2001 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: new assemble.pl
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Gibbs
Makes Win32 use ExtUtils::Command::rm_f as a rm -f replacemnt.
Regards
Mattia
Index: Configure.pl
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/Configure.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -2 -r1.19 Configure.pl
--- Configure.pl
Some cleanup, plus:
* detects assembler errors
* better output when tests are run manually
and tests fail
Suggestions for the new output format are welcome
C:\Developement\perl6\parrotperl t/op/basic.t
1..5
not ok 1 - noop, end
# Failed test (t/op/basic.t at line 6)
### Got:
#=.
with CygWin everything works ok...however I get a ton of warnings for
packfile.c that look like they need to be addressed...I'll look at them
soon. Also, when I type make test it tells me that test doesn't need to do
anything; this was happening before these changes, but I was wondering if
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
When tests fail for Really Bad reasons, they tend to do something like this:
Got: '
'
Expected: '
ok 1
...
'
It'd be really nice if we could intercept that and give more detail on why
the test failed. Did the assembler compile to a PBC ok? Did the
--- Forwarded message follows ---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Parrot Smoke Sep 25 19:00:04 2001 UTC MSWin32 4.0
Date sent: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:00:03 +0200
Automated smoke report for patch Sep 25
GNU does offer the gettext tools library for just such a purpose. I don't
know how it will translate to the various platforms however, and it likely
is a major overkill for what we are trying to do.
http://www.gnu.org/manual/gettext/html_mono/gettext.html#SEC2 - Purpose
It might make
:(
I just tried and the Sun Sep 23 13:00:00 2001 UTC
segfaults all the way in t/op/number.t and t/op/trans.t,
( IV = long, NV = double )
( other tests are 100% OK ), so there are problems
with floats. Tomorrow at the university
I can debug the problem
( debugging over a dialup is a pain... )
Cool; thanks for this. Can you add a row to your smoke configuration
which does *not* change the default type sizes?
Sure. WRT segfaults, I think I found the cause for the problems:
The files inf cvs.perl.org/snapshots seem out of date.
$ diff -u parrot/assemble.pl ../parrot.cvs/assemble.pl |
This looks really nice...
Regards
Mattia
--- Forwarded message follows ---
Automated smoke report for patch Sep 22 07:00:00 2001 UTC
v0.01 on linux using cc version 2.95.2 2313 (Debian GNU/Linux)
O = OK
F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
? = still running
t/op/number.t is basically testing that
the rounding behaviour is the same across all
platforms. This is ***wrong***.
Regards
Mattia
--- Forwarded message follows ---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Parrot Smoke
I'd be sending 3 smoke reports ( Win2k/MSVC, x86/Linux,
Alphs/Tru64/GCC ) per snapshot, and maybe I will
start on cygwin and Win2k/MinGW, too.
Before I spam everyone with this,
is someone interested in it, and if so,
should I continue sending it to perl6-internals,
or is is preferable a different
--- Forwarded message follows ---
Automated smoke report for patch Sep 22 13:00:00 2001 UTC
v0.01 on dec_osf using gcc version 2.95.2
O = OK
F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
? = still running or test results not (yet) available
Build failures during:
GRRR... always use reply yo all...
--- Forwarded message follows ---
From: Mattia Barbon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Tru64 Numeric bug exposed!
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
cvsuser 01/09/22 10:20:59
Modified:.Makefile.in
Added: Test More.pm Simple.pm Utils.pm
Log:
I'm sick of having to install Test::More everywhere. Temporary measure
until we remove this silly dependency.
I promise I'll do it after 0.02 is out.
Mattia
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 12:27:53AM +0200, Mattia Barbon wrote:
[parrpt]$ perl Configure.pl --defaults --define cc=gcc --define
ccflags=-O3 -Iinclude --define iv=long --define nv=double
[parrot]$ make
[parrot]$ for i in t/op/number*.pbc ; do ./test_prog $i; done
Whoa - did you re
not ok 15 - gt_nc_ic
# Failed test (Parrot/Test.pm at line 74)
# got: undef
# expected: 'ok 1
ok 2
ok 3
'
So Test::Harenss keeps whining about test 2 answrd ( yes, the PC
with the brokn keyboard again ) after test 9, and such.
Could output be changed to anyting else?
Thanks
It is gcc 2.95.2, not 2.8.1
*SMACK* to anyone kept the perl scripts
compatible with perl 5.004_04
Regards
Mattia
P.S.: Suggstions about how to make report lins shorter
*VERY* welcome
-- Forwarded message --
Automated smoke report for patch Sep 21 07:00:01 2001 UTC
'C:Perinperl.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
Apply this for the C:Perinperl.exe problem
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Mattia
Index: Parrot/Test.pm
===
RCS file:
These are the minimal fixes for smoking to take effect.
After these are in, I'll release Parrot::Smoke
* Makefile.in
* it is $(INC)/config.h, not config.h
* .o = $(O)
* test_main.c
* _read was ok when it was inside
ifdef WIN32
now it must be read ( or it fails in
Automated smoke report for patch Sep 20 00:00:02 2001
v0.01 on MSWin32 using cl version
O = OK
F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
? = still running or test results not (yet) available
Build failures during: - = unknown
c = Configure, m = make, t = make
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Mon 17 Sep 2001 23:08, Ask Bjoern Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops, I forgot to tell anyone. I made CVS export and tar up a
snapshot every 6 hours. It is available at
http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/
Any chance on
here it is.
I'll release Parrot::Smoke 0.01 tomorrow,
promise.
*PLEASE* - change _read to read in test_main.c
- correct integer.t, test 1
not to test 0x == -1
( that's why we have got all F... )
Regards
Mattia
Automated smoke report for patch ?
This patch contains different things.
If you prefer three smaller patches,
just speak, I'll resend.
* Configure.pl
* 5.004_04 does not have $Config{_o}, $Config{_exe},
use obj_ext, and exe_ext
* Use ExtUtils::Manifest for manifest parsing
( now you can put blank lines/comments/
Easy Makefile.in patch. I was worried that Win32 might need the linker
(the change to $(LD) was submitted as part of a Win32 compatibility
patch) but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't have a MinGW
Fine here
Regards
Mattia
set I2, -2147483648
print I2
print \\n
set I3, 4294967295
print I3
print \\n
end
CODE
305419896
-1698898191
2147483647
-2147483648
-1
OUTPUT
I think that especting 4294967295 == -1 because they have the same
bit pattern (
there is something wrong with, uh, something...
Currently substr is named substr_s_s_i.
if I write substr_s_s_i S9, S1, I0, I1, all is good.
if I write substr S9, S1, I0, I1, I get an assembler error.
Questions:
* All opcodes include the destination register type in the name
why substr is
Changes from the last one:
* some tidying in the assembly
( now uses set I4, 4 instead of set_i_ic I4, 4 )
* moved lib/Test/Parrot.pm to Parrot/Test.pm
* now run with perl t/harness
Regards
Mattia
diff -r -b -u -2 -N parrot.cvs/Parrot/Test.pm parrot/Parrot/Test.pm
---
## +#if defined(WIN32)
## +program_code = malloc( file_stat.st_size );
## +#else
#Should we be using malloc, or are we supposed to use our own allocator?
#(I haven't been munging in the C, so I don't really know--it just looks
#a little suspicious.)
In memory.{h,c} there is a
Run with
perl -Mlib=lib t/harness
Tests live in t/*/*.t .
In case of failure the assembler, bytecode and output
are available as t/dir/testnnn.pasm/pbc/out
tested under Linux and Win32
Regards
Mattia
--patch--
diff -r -b -u -2 -N parrot.cvs/lib/Test/Parrot.pm
parrot/lib/Test/Parrot.pm
---
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:07:00AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Isn't the correct solution to this problem to say
#include parrot/config.h
That is, include the subdirectory prefix in all #includes. You -I the
directory containing parrot/, and that avoids randomly located
This patch adds:
an hints directory ( files are named hints/lc($^O).pl )
therir contents are eval'd in Config.pl
it adds to Config.pl some flags
--debugging Enable debugging
adds -g or equivalento to compiler flags
--defaults Accept all default values
like -d option
PLEASE can someone rewrite the tests to actually *test* things
and print ok 1\n and so on?
Here it is ( for the second time )
Quick, or I'll call Schwern in.
Ah, I thought you missed my patches, then I was correct
both attached
testsuite.diff:
-
Run with
perl
If you're looking for something to do, we *always* have good
little jobs for people. :)
Great!
6) A test suite! My kingdom for a test suite!
I had a first stab at it; attached module + sample script,
for discussion only, because it is a kludge; I'll tidy it up
this evening.
Questions:
*
To Schwern:
* Test::Parrot ( or whatever ), needs to be special cased
in Test::Simple::ok ( as Test::More is ), to report test
line correctly.
A Test::Simple function to know the actual test number would
be nice, too.
Regards
Mattia
67 matches
Mail list logo
