Re: RFC 301 (v1) Cache byte-compiled programs and modules

2000-09-27 Thread Chaim Frenkel
"RA" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: RA Michael Maraist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I suggested this a while ago, and the response was that automatically writing files is a security risk. You should extend your RFC to describe a caching directory or configuration. RA This will be

Re: RFC 301 (v1) Cache byte-compiled programs and modules

2000-09-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Chaim Frenkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "RA" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: RA This will be completely impossible to implement in some installation RA environments, such as AFS or read-only remote NFS mounts. I really RA don't like software that tries to play dynamic compilation

RFC 301 (v1) Cache byte-compiled programs and modules

2000-09-25 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
This and other RFCs are available on the web at http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ =head1 TITLE Cache byte-compiled programs and modules =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 25 Sep 2000 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Number: 301 Version: 1 Status: Developing