* Michael Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040220 10:35]:
>
> One thing that would help is if people ran
>
> perl tools/docs/write_docs.pl -d -s
>
Runs fine on my box:
interactionmac parrot $ uname -a
Linux interactionmac.physics.uq.edu.au 2.4.19-r6 #7 Tue Apr 22 16:54:53 EST
2003 ppc 740/750
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Nah. Modern filesystems understand that A and a are the same letter.
>> It's those old antique filesystems that don't understand that... :-P
>
> yeP dAn, yOu ArE rIghT.
Still the same letters. Just a strang
> One thing that would help is if people ran
>
> perl tools/docs/write_docs.pl -d -s
>
> on various platforms and told me if it works - or what they
runs fine on Windows 2000, with only the warning mentioned by chromatic.
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nah. Modern filesystems understand that A and a are the same letter.
> It's those old antique filesystems that don't understand that... :-P
yeP dAn, yOu ArE rIghT.
leO, sCnr
At 4:56 PM -0800 2/19/04, chromatic wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 16:34, Michael Scott wrote:
One thing that would help is if people ran
perl tools/docs/write_docs.pl -d -s
on various platforms and told me if it works - or what they did to make
it work - because I only have access to Mac OS X
Thanks, applied.
On 20 Feb 2004, at 01:56, chromatic wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 16:34, Michael Scott wrote:
One thing that would help is if people ran
perl tools/docs/write_docs.pl -d -s
on various platforms and told me if it works - or what they did to
make
it work - because I only have a
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 16:34, Michael Scott wrote:
> One thing that would help is if people ran
>
> perl tools/docs/write_docs.pl -d -s
>
> on various platforms and told me if it works - or what they did to make
> it work - because I only have access to Mac OS X 10.3.2 here.
It choked her
On 19 Feb 2004, at 20:59, Simon Glover wrote:
pdd12_assembly.pod -- what was the intent of this? (i.e. is there
stuff
that isn't covered in pdd06_pasm.pod that should go in here, or can
we just dump this and recycle the number?)
Yes it should go. It's just an earlier version of pdd06.
I'm
Re. obsolete docs:
parrot_assembly.pod is a really old version of pdd06, and should
probably just be dumped (the last patch to it was 16 months ago, the
last non-trivial patch about 2 years ago)
embed.pod should probably be reworked as a proper PDD (since
pdd10_embedding.pod is empty
Mike's been doing an amazing job getting the docs in order, which is
really cool. Things are looking good. There are, however, some big
doc jobs that need tackling, and I'd like to get someone (or several
someones) to dig into them.
I'm working on PDD 15, which should be done soon, and I'll giv
10 matches
Mail list logo
