I finally figured out why the windows machine wasn't showing in the
tinderbox, and fixed that. (System dates. D'oh!) We now have (again)
a reliable windows machine building parrot for test, both under
Cygwin and Visual Studio/.NET (though it builds a native executable
there rather than a .NET o
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The cygwin build sorta kinda works OK, but the link fails because of
> a missing _inet_pton. I seem to remember this cropping up in the past
> and I thought we'd gotten it fixed, but apparently not.
Kind of fixed:
$ perl Configure.pl --help
...
--defi
At 7:26 PM +0100 3/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The cygwin build sorta kinda works OK, but the link fails because of
a missing _inet_pton. I seem to remember this cropping up in the past
and I thought we'd gotten it fixed, but apparently not.
Kind of fix
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:26 PM +0100 3/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
--define=inet_aton Quick hack to use inet_aton instead of inet_pton
Sounds like a job for a hints file. :)
Done. (Done hackishly, but done.)
--
Brent "Dax" Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perl and Parrot hacker
Oceania has
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done. (Done hackishly, but done.)
A bit too hackish IMHO. The Configure --define switch can take multiple
arguments, separated by commas.
A hint equivalent could be:
Configure::Data->set {
D_inet_aton => 1
D_xxx => 1
}
At 9:19 PM +0100 3/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done. (Done hackishly, but done.)
A bit too hackish IMHO. The Configure --define switch can take multiple
arguments, separated by commas.
A hint equivalent could be:
Configure::Data->set {
Dan Sugalski wrote:
If that works better, great. The hack fix apparently didn't, at least
according to the tinder builds.
Had a massive think-o about the meaning of --define. The version now in
CVS should work. (Tested it on my own box--had to add make, gcc, and
perl to Cygwin, but it builds n
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The VS/.NET build works fine, though three of the tests fail for odd
> reasons.
t\op\string.t 1 256 1301 0.77% 123
Missing end
t\pmc\perlnum.t 1 256361 2.78% 36
The ugly +/- zero test. Needs further investigation.
On Mar-26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> The VS/.NET build works fine, though three of the tests fail for odd
> reasons. Those look like potential test harness errors.
>
> The cygwin build sorta kinda works OK, but the link fails because of
> a missing _inet_pton. I seem to remember this cropping up in
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I finally figured out why the windows machine wasn't showing in the
> tinderbox, and fixed that. (System dates. D'oh!) We now have (again) a
> reliable windows machine building parrot for test, both under Cygwin and
> Visual Studio/.NET (though it builds
At 3:55 PM +0100 3/29/04, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I finally figured out why the windows machine wasn't showing in the
tinderbox, and fixed that. (System dates. D'oh!) We now have (again) a
reliable windows machine building parrot for test, both under Cygwin
11 matches
Mail list logo
