Re: Gripes about Pod6 (S26)

2010-02-10 Thread John Gabriele
Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural feel to it, and deserves a doc markup format that's also natural: [Markdown] (and [Pandoc]'s Markdown has just the right additions, IMO). [Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/ [Pandoc]:

Re: Gripes about Pod6 (S26)

2010-02-10 Thread John Gabriele
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Mark Overmeer m...@overmeer.net wrote: * John Gabriele (jmg3...@gmail.com) [100209 14:31]: [Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/ [Pandoc]: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ [reST]: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html Or, more Perl like

Re: Gripes about Pod6 (S26)

2010-02-10 Thread John Gabriele
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote: Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural feel to {snip} Gah. Sorry for the quasi-double-post. I posted on google groups, it didn't show up, then I jumped the gun and posted a similar message to the ML

Re: Gripes about Pod6 (S26)

2010-02-09 Thread John Gabriele
Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural and well-worn feel to it, and deserves a doc markup format that also feels natural. What works very well for me is [Markdown] (and [Pandoc]'s Markdown has mostly just the right additions, IMO). [Markdown]: