Timeouts, shouldn't be reliant on UNIX. (Although I dont think they
should
be in the language eigther. A system is easily developed using threads.
something which I hope to develop when perl6 is ready...)
I don't understand this paragraph.
As it stands, if you want to have a timeout
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Bevan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "raptor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: println() ... printbr()
I actually saw this in the newsgroups and thought it was a neat idea.
What
about
Just a thought, but I think it woul be a good idea to include the
'java-esqe' practice of including packages via foo.barr.*
or in Perl's case Foo::Bar::* (assume that the module include syntax remains
the same)...
I can see that in the case of some module directories, where the modules are
I started writing this mail by asking:
Does anyone else agree that perl should have support for (but not
forcefully) error handling...
maybe a little like Java's??
I know that sort of thing can be acheived with eval(), but surely
Which is as far as I got, because something new has
