Re: Naming debate- what's the location for it?

2018-02-09 Thread Steve Pitchford
Ok. So here is something revolutionary. Free up "Perl 6" for a future generation of Perl 5 and remove the ceiling on the perl 5 language. Perl 6 has become more than a major iteration, hasn't it? Perl on parrot Perl on jam Perl on mono Lots of space for a five from six once you vacate the lot.

Re: Naming debate- what's the location for it?

2018-02-09 Thread Steve Pitchford
Thought the conversation felt like bikeshedding but... My point still stands. This is a new language targetted at a post php world. The significance of a version number will be lost outside the perl echo chamber and in that context seen as baggage... IMHO... YMMV... On 9 Feb 2018 6:15 pm, "Lucas B

Re: Naming debate- what's the location for it?

2018-02-08 Thread Steve Pitchford
Well, for what it's worth, as an outsider - IMHO, leaving "perl" behinds a good thing. Love it or loath it, we live in a js/python/jvm leaning world. Perl was great, but it's dated. Why have the baggage? Rakudo is a new language. Treat it as such - best hope for it. In layman's terms an informal "P

Re: Commensurability as Key

2013-08-23 Thread Steve Pitchford
oduce a cultural convention for method names. It would also maintain perls reputation for generous use of squiggles. On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Lang wrote: > On Aug 23, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Steve Pitchford > wrote: > > > How would you implement, in a robust way, the fol

Re: Commensurability as Key

2013-08-23 Thread Steve Pitchford
plemented as a module (if we have a consistent idea what we > want). > Currently it's possible to change the language to (a subset of) Perl 5 ( > https://github.com/rakudo-p5/v5) so it should be possible to at least > prototype the units handling. > > > 2013/8/23 Steve P

Fwd: Commensurability as Key

2013-08-23 Thread Steve Pitchford
--- From: Jonathan Lang Date: Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:47 AM Subject: Re: Commensurability as Key To: Steve Pitchford On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Steve Pitchford wrote: > > I think James Bowery's comments are intended to address a real need for programming languages to wor

Re: Commensurability as Key

2013-08-23 Thread Steve Pitchford
I think James Bowery's comments are intended to address a real need for programming languages to work with units of measurement. It might even prevent aircraft accidents which have really happened because fuel was delivered in Canadian gallons, or kilograms, when the pilots request was for American

Re: exponentiation of Duration's

2010-11-17 Thread Steve Pitchford
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Oha wrote: > > I could be wrong but this reminds me that a Duration could not be only based > in seconds, but also in other units (which may automagically be converted to > seconds) and also those seconds may be leap or not. > > Maybe the point is that really the p

Re: perl6 compiler

2010-03-19 Thread Steve Pitchford
his April or at > the berry least the summer? > > > Sent from my iPhone > Wendell Hatcher > wendell_hatc...@comcast.net > 303-520-7554 > Blogsite: <http://thoughtsofaperlprogrammer.vox.com/> > http://thoughtsofaperlprogrammer.vox.com/ > > > On Mar 19, 2010,

Re: perl6 compiler

2010-03-19 Thread Steve Pitchford
n version coming out soon? > > Sent from my iPhone > Wendell Hatcher > wendell_hatc...@comcast.net > 303-520-7554 > Blogsite: <http://thoughtsofaperlprogrammer.vox.com/> > http://thoughtsofaperlprogrammer.vox.com/ > > > On Mar 17, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Steve Pitchford

Re: perl6 compiler

2010-03-17 Thread Steve Pitchford
Have a read of this: http://www.parrot.org/ The parrot project is to build a virtual machine for dynamic languages, like perl 6. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Dell wrote: > Has anyone thought about designing or is the Rakudo compiler similar to the > JVM on an enterprise level? What I mean

Re: what should be the default extension?

2008-01-08 Thread Steve Pitchford
Richard Hainsworth wrote: May I suggest the following extension to the 'use ' pragma, viz. use in as constrained by local system> Without wanting to sound too stupid - why not delegate the decision to a class/resource loader of some manner, specify your resources as '[some unique charactor