On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 09:08, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Well, there's the problem. If you see those as the same symbol, then of
> course this is deeply confusing.
I just want to make the point that the "you" in that sentence is "you,
the user of Perl", not "you, Juerd". Obviously, you are not confuse
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:23 +0200, Juerd wrote:
> Aaron Sherman skribis 2005-05-16 5:54 (-0400):
> > I'm not sure I see that you changed anything
[...]
> Okay, let's try it differently, then:
[...something that looks like braille...]
And now, you've s/[\$\w]+//g; what point are you making, Jue
Aaron Sherman skribis 2005-05-16 5:54 (-0400):
> On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 19:18 +0200, Juerd wrote:
> > Now:
> > Declaration ExplicitImplicit $_ $?SELF
> > has $.var | $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
> > has $:var | $obj.:var \ .:var \ ./:var \
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 19:18 +0200, Juerd wrote:
> Now:
> Declaration ExplicitImplicit $_ $?SELF
> has $.var | $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
> has $:var | $obj.:var \ .:var \ ./:var \
>
> Consistent:
> has $.var \ $obj.var \
Now:
Declaration ExplicitImplicit $_ $?SELF
has $.var | $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
has $:var | $obj.:var \ .:var \ ./:var \
Consistent:
has $.var \ $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
has $.:var \$
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 18:34 +0200, Juerd wrote:
> I've been looking for a good moment to come with this, but there is
> none, making this as good a point as any: I don't like the dot in
> attributes, and the colon that replaces it.
>
> If we have .method and .:method, then we should have $.attr a
