Re: SecureRemote

2003-08-20 Thread Pedro Marcolino
Hi, I've already read that thread , but the URL( http://www.cryptonomicon.org/notes/vpn_nat.html ) is not working any more. Regards, Pedro On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:54:13 -0700 Trevor Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, Aug 18, 2003, at 15:50 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm

Re: Redirecting bridge

2003-08-20 Thread Marc Balmer
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200 Jan Roeloffzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not? In my setting, they actually are in the same subnet. The bridge divides the

Re: Redirecting bridge

2003-08-20 Thread Dieter Kasielke
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:22:56 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200 Jan Roeloffzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not? In my setting, they

Re: Redirecting bridge

2003-08-20 Thread Jason Dixon
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 10:47, Dieter Kasielke wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:22:56 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200 Jan Roeloffzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a bridge. Your second setting

Re: SecureRemote

2003-08-20 Thread Jolan Luff
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:09:36AM +0100, Pedro Marcolino wrote: I've already read that thread , but the URL( http://www.cryptonomicon.org/notes/vpn_nat.html ) is not working any more. I wrote it, and I don't think any of it is applicable to you. It was for broken implementations which

upgrade to 3.3

2003-08-20 Thread Paul B. Henson
I've finally gotten around to setting up 3.3 on a test system and hopefully soon will deploy it in production. At an operating system level, version 3.3 seems to have improved kernel memory management. My system has 512 MB of RAM. Under 3.1, I was unable to increase NMBCLUSTERS past 4096 without

Re: NAT problem

2003-08-20 Thread Tiago Pierezan Camargo
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:02:28 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope, rdr rules at all So you probably are using binat, aren't you?.. well, try to use tcpdump and pflog to figure out what is going on.. P.S.: I would recommend VNC instead of XP remote assistantance(tm) :) -- Tiago