Ingolf Zeiner Petersen wrote:
Matt Pearce wrote:
I run 1536/256 ADSL here and found that a figure or 205Kb is the
upper limit for me (versus the 170Kb you have) , any more and the
queue wont drop packets correctly, any less and i'm not getting the
full bandwidth i'm paying for. I
Ingolf Zeiner Petersen wrote:
(256Kbit/s ADSL)
altq on rl1 priq bandwidth 170Kb queue { std_out, websrv_out, web_out,
im_out, rdp_out, radio_out, ssh_out, dns_out, udp_gaming_out,
ip_telefoni_out }
I run 1536/256 ADSL here and found that a figure or 205Kb is the upper
limit for me (versus
Hi All,
Just a quick question regarding ALTQ, I have been trying to shorten the
length of the queue yet when I do a pfctl -sq -v I still get a
qlength:0/50 even when I thought I have set it to 10. I have
included a couple of relevant items below, if more info is needed i'll
post it (dont
Hi All,
I'm about to start working on a few rules for QoS on inbound TCP and was
wondering if someone could tell me if there is a maximum of 15 queue's
total or whether I can have 15 rules per in and out and/or 15 rules per
interface ?? I have had a look around all the documentation and cant
tefol tefol wrote:
Hi there.
I manage several different pf firewalls around the country, and so I
need to have ssh access allowed. Occaisionally, (more and more often
lately), I get script kiddies having a go at brute forcing my root
password (see below) or brute forcing a selection of guesse
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I believe the idea here is to set TOS bits on the packets as they pass
through the OpenBSD gateway, so *other* routers in the path can act
accordingly, using their own queues and priorities.
The two are not necessarily mutually e
Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 05:05:41PM +1100, Matt Pearce wrote:
Can someone tell me if the load balancing in PF divides the data amonst
the interfaces by packet or connection ??
ie for an outgoing request to a web server with 2x512/512 DSL
connection, someone requests a
Hi All,
Can someone tell me if the load balancing in PF divides the data amonst
the interfaces by packet or connection ??
ie for an outgoing request to a web server with 2x512/512 DSL
connection, someone requests a download of 20mb, now will this 20mb be
restricted to only one of the connection
I have been putting ALTQ with the priq disciple through its paces the
past week and it doesnt seem to be doing as its told. As you can see
from my rules ack traffic is fairly high up on my list and almost
exclusively has top priority, however, when i'm running a p2p program on
my desktop uploa
Sorry for annoying everyone, I have found the problem and am feeling
very silly about it too. As it turns out with this new server I am
running the config for ppp in the rc.conf (FreeBSD) from my old 4.10,
the syntax has changed so it worked but the default ppp was to turn
ppp_nat on and I nev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The application may not be NAT compatible. For example, what if it
graps your desktop nic ip and tells someone outside your firewall to
connect to 555.555.555.555
Some applications have a user setting that might help... Citix
(clusters), for example, had a setting for t
Hi All,
I'm new to pf so bear with me if i'm asking a silly question.
ok, backround info. I have an external ip of 444.444.444.444/32 (real
world routable) and a block of addresses 333.333.333.333/29 (also real
world routeable). Now on my desktop pc 555.555.555.555 I am running a
p2p program.
Hi All,
This is my first post to this list as I couldnt find the answers I am
looking for in the archives.
Ok, I am running FreeBSD 5.3 with PF and ALTQ and am struggling a little
with the altq rules a little. Now my questions are:-
If I am running 2 rules for udp packets to be prioritized and
13 matches
Mail list logo
