On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 02:39:04PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > When referencing RFC's, we have a mix of ulinking to the ietf.org entry and
> > not. Also, for subsequent mentions of the same RFC on the same page we have
> > some as while oth
> On 1 Dec 2020, at 13:39, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> The attached patch adds ulinks for all
>> RFC's and marks subsequent mentions as acronym to make the docs consistent.
>> It
>> also spells all as "RFC " with a whitespace as that was the most
On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
When referencing RFC's, we have a mix of ulinking to the ietf.org entry and
not. Also, for subsequent mentions of the same RFC on the same page we have
some as while others are not.
I'm not sure how sensible the tag is for these. I mean, yeah,
When referencing RFC's, we have a mix of ulinking to the ietf.org entry and
not. Also, for subsequent mentions of the same RFC on the same page we have
some as while others are not. The attached patch adds ulinks for all
RFC's and marks subsequent mentions as acronym to make the docs consistent.
