Hi Michael
> Actually, looking around we use connection_name for other commands
> like EXEC SQL or DISCONNECT, so renaming connection_object to
> connection_name makes the documentation more consistent. And done.
Thank you for commiting!
Regards.
Yusuke Egashira
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:49:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object
> refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to
> "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the
> intention is to use
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:39:27AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The "connection_name" parameter's explanation is not in Parameters
> section.
> Instead of it, "connection_object" parameter is in Parameters section. Its
> explanation seems about "
ameters section. Its
explanation seems about "connection_name".
Is it typo about "connection_name" in Synopsis section, or
"connection_object" in Parameters section?
