Thom Brown schrieb:
A long-standing problem we've had with PostgreSQL queries in PHP is
that the returned data for boolean columns is the string 'f' instead
of the native boolean value of false.
This problem is solved since nearly 5 years with PDO. You can use an
abstraction like DDDBL (see
try to cast to xml xml_payload::xml
El mié, 10-02-2010 a las 12:39 +0300, Allan Kamau escribió:
As advised by Peter,
Below is an example (including the ddl and dml statements), it _drops_
and creates a table called simple_table and a sequence called
simple_table_seq both in the public
Greg,
Let's look at this from an application developer perspective. Suppose my
application has a few hundreds of tables. I know _very_well_ how the
tables are used. I'd like to tune PostgreSQL so that it would respect
how the application works in order to get best possible performance.
My
Greg,
Alexei Vladishev wrote:
Is there a way of configuring PostgreSQL so that one specific table
would
use, say, 4GB of buffer cache while other tables would use the rest?
It sounds like you're looking for what other databases call
pinning. It's not supported in PostgreSQL right now, and
Bret,
And then, even if the support is there, you'd need to outline exactly
how you're planning on pushing this button.
Specifically, what's your usage pattern that would make this a
win for you?
Let me explain. I have a very busy application generating thousands
of SQLs per second.
Hey,
I'm having some trouble trying to join tables because I'm trying to join
data in a column to a column name. An example looks like this:
Table 1:
field_names(varchar 255) | field_title(varchar 255)
name_field | User Name
interest_field | User Interest
number_field | User Number
Table 2:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
But having said that, I don't get the point of trying to build a
nonstandard installation from the RPM. That seems more or less
antithetical to most of the design concepts of RPM-based distros;
and it certainly seems pretty silly if your
Any ideas why we would be receiving this cache lookup failed message?
PostgreSQL 8.3.7 64 bit, RHEL 5 64 bit OS
Linux hostname.net 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:15 EDT 2008 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
2010-02-07 08:05:36 MSTERROR: cache lookup failed for relation 391262678
Due to a server issue we needed a reinstallation of Ubuntu along with a
downgrade to Ubuntu Hardy.
So this is what we did:
- copied all from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ to the new server
/var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/
- edited /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/postmaster.opts to correct the path
The following SQL leads to a unique constraint violation error message
(PostgreSQL 8.4.1).
create table test (val integer);
create unique index test_uni on test(val);
insert into test (val) values (1);
insert into test (val) values (2);
insert into test (val) values (3);
Hi,
can we safely put the data from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ of server x to
/var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/ of server y, considering that the new target
machine is running 8.3 whereas the old one ran 8.4 ?
Rgards
Marc
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
Hi Ben,
could you post your trigger function? When you need to rebuild the index,
you could disable the trigger setting the flag if the article is modified.
This could speed up your UPDATE.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Timo Klecker
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
I managed to install again postgresql-8.4 from hardy-backports.
Now the installation is identical with the previous one.
With the fresh database, the server starts up fine.
Now I copied all from the backup to
/usr/lib/postgresql/8.4
/var/lib/postgresql/8.4
The the startup fails like this:
*
Hi,
We have tables with data type CLOb and BLOBs (in oracle). This needs o be
migrated to Postgresql. What data types can be used for this. I've done some
resaerch/search in this and found that (correct me if Im wrong)
1. For CLObs the equivalent are TEXT and OID(lob).
But streaming(thro' jdbc)
Hi,
can we safely put the data from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ of server x to
/var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/ of server y, considering that the new target
machine is running 8.3 whereas the old one ran 8.4 ?
Rgards
Marc
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
Hi, I was told to email you about this question...
Cheers,
Rhys
Begin forwarded message:
From: Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.infomailto:guilla...@lelarge.info
Date: 8 February 2010 10:41:57 GMT
To: Farrer, Rhys r.farre...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.farre...@imperial.ac.uk
Cc:
Hello,
I'm a long time user and I had always installed postgres by compiling
from source.
I recently moved to a new environment where everything is installed as
rpm and plus
I need to install a newer postgres for testing while keeping the
existing version in place.
That leads me to repackage
Chris Barnes wrote:
I have this error when selecting from the pg_stat_user_tables. I
restarted postgres and the error went away.
Has anyone else seen this error?
[postg...@preventdb02 londiste]$ cat
/data/pgsql/data/pg_log/postgresql-Tue.log
WARNING: pgstat wait timeout
There have been
Marc Lustig, 08.02.2010 11:36:
Hi, can we safely put the data from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ of
server x to /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/ of server y, considering
that the new target machine is running 8.3 whereas the old one ran
8.4 ?
No, a dump restore is required (as stated in the
In response to Khin, Gerald :
The following SQL leads to a unique constraint violation error message
(PostgreSQL 8.4.1).
create table test (val integer);
create unique index test_uni on test(val);
insert into test (val) values (1);
insert into test (val) values
In response to Marc Lustig :
Hi,
can we safely put the data from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ of server x to
/var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/ of server y, considering that the new target
machine is running 8.3 whereas the old one ran 8.4 ?
No!
Make a regular Backup und restore that Backup.
In response to Thomas Kellerer :
Marc Lustig, 08.02.2010 11:36:
Hi, can we safely put the data from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ of
server x to /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/ of server y, considering
that the new target machine is running 8.3 whereas the old one ran
8.4 ?
No, a dump
A. Kretschmer, 11.02.2010 09:42:
In response to Thomas Kellerer :
Marc Lustig, 08.02.2010 11:36:
Hi, can we safely put the data from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ of
server x to /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/ of server y, considering
that the new target machine is running 8.3 whereas the old
u235sentinel wrote:
I have a strange problem we noticed the other day with
triggers. We're
running 8.3.3 on Solaris 10 (intel) and have a feed that comes in
regularly to populate a table we're working on. The feed works just
fine inserting rows however the following trigger stops the
Hi,
Please why is it that we must register at EnterpriseDB and register
each Windows installation of postgreSQL these days?
At times, I need to install on a server that is not on the internet
and have had to bear the pain of configuring a server for internet
before I can install
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:00 AM, db.subscripti...@shepherdhill.biz wrote:
Hi,
Please why is it that we must register at EnterpriseDB and register each
Windows installation of postgreSQL these days?
There is no requirement to register to use or download PostgreSQL.
--
Dave Page
In response to db.subscripti...@shepherdhill.biz :
Hi,
Please why is it that we must register at EnterpriseDB and register
each Windows installation of postgreSQL these days?
That's not true.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -
You can always download PostgreSQL installer for any supported platform
without any registration from
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgdownload.do.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:30 PM, db.subscripti...@shepherdhill.biz wrote:
Hi,
Please why is it that we must register at EnterpriseDB and
Thanks.
I think I mistook postgres for postgres-plus.
Quoting Ashesh Vashi ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com:
You can always download PostgreSQL installer for any supported platform
without any registration from
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgdownload.do.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:30
Hello,
Looking at the TODO List, I feel that only some aspects of the COPY FROM
command are adressed.
Could a discussion trigger some activity on this topic :o) ?
Best regards,
Marc Mamin
Here my wish list:
COPY tablename [ ( column [, ...] ) ]
FROM { 'filename' | STDIN }
[ [ WITH
I am trying to build SQL commands that insert values exported from a bytea
column. Output facilities do not escape single quotes for bytea column. As
such, the built INSERT SQL can be invalid because single quotes can appear in
values. For example, the built (invalid) INSERT SQL command can
Hello
why you don't use PQescapeBytea function ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/libpq-exec.html#LIBPQ-EXEC-ESCAPE-BYTEA
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2010/2/11 seil...@so-net.net.tw:
I am trying to build SQL commands that insert values exported from a bytea
column. Output
Hey all,
I'm working on some server-side C code that involves a few calculations on a
numeric value. The calculation is along the lines of:
(numeric) result = (numeric) value * ((int) base ^ (int) power);
What's the usual approach to write functions like these?
This is how far I got:
I guess it'd be useful to mention what types the different fields are, doh!
Begin forwarded message:
Hey all,
I'm working on some server-side C code that involves a few calculations on a
numeric value. The calculation is along the lines of:
(numeric) result = (numeric) value *
The following SQL leads to a unique constraint violation error message
(PostgreSQL 8.4.1).
create table test (val integer);
create unique index test_uni on test(val);
insert into test (val) values (1);
insert into test (val) values (2);
insert into test (val) values (3);
Timo Klecker wrote:
could you post your trigger function? When you need to rebuild the index,
you could disable the trigger setting the flag if the article is modified.
This could speed up your UPDATE.
Embarrassingly, when I checked, I found that I'd never gotten around to
writing that
On 2/10/2010 7:15 PM, paul e wrote:
Before Installed postgresql Windows7 went straight to my user account.
Now when it boots I have to go to a selection page where I choose
between my user account and a postgresql user account. Is there any
way to bypass this so it boots directly to my user
Will this come through as a commit on the pgfoundry codebase? I've
subscribed looking for it
The last edit, if I read the release notes and tracebacks on the
codebase correctly, goes back to the early part of 2009 - which strongly
implies that there are a **LOT** of people out there that
In response to Khin, Gerald :
The following SQL leads to a unique constraint violation error message
You have already got the answer ... for the same question from you.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: - Header)
GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006
In article 4b72aeb3.4000...@selestial.com,
Howard Cole howardn...@selestial.com writes:
Is there an SQL function to determine the size of a large object?
I'm using a pgsql helper function for that:
CREATE FUNCTION lo_size(oid oid) RETURNS integer
LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $$
DECLARE
2010/2/8 Marc Lustig m...@marclustig.com
Due to a server issue we needed a reinstallation of Ubuntu along with a
downgrade to Ubuntu Hardy.
So this is what we did:
- copied all from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ to the new server
/var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/
- edited
2010/2/10 Ben Campbell b...@scumways.com
I settled on:
CREATE TABLE needs_indexing (
article_id integer REFERENCES article(id) PRIMARY KEY
);
The primary key-ness enforces uniqueness, and any time I want to add an
article to the queue I just make sure I do a DELETE before the INSERT.
Hi Ben,
you can check weather one of your indexes is used within the Query by simply
using EXPLAIN ANALYZE.
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * from journo WHERE id IN (SELECT journo_id FROM
journo_attr WHERE article_id=$AnyExistingIdHere$);
Maybe you have another trigger on the journo table, that is
I understand the situation. I'll upload the improved code ASAP.
--
Koichi Suzuki
2010/2/11 Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net:
Will this come through as a commit on the pgfoundry codebase? I've
subscribed looking for it
The last edit, if I read the release notes and
Dear Folks;
A very serious bug was reported on pg_lesslog. So far, I found it's
a bug in pg_compresslog. Please do not use pg_compresslog and
pg_decompresslog until improved version is uploaded.
I strongly advise to take base backup of your database.
I apologize for inconvenience. I'll
On Monday 08 February 2010 7:11:28 am Marc Lustig wrote:
I managed to install again postgresql-8.4 from hardy-backports.
Now the installation is identical with the previous one.
With the fresh database, the server starts up fine.
Now I copied all from the backup to
/usr/lib/postgresql/8.4
Carsten Kropf ckro...@fh-hof.de writes:
Thanks a lot so far. I adopted my structures and am now storing two fields
(v_len_ and dimensions) and the storage is now working properly. If I now
would try to combine two of these points to a range (like cube) including an
upper and a lower bound
Keaton Adams keaton_ad...@mcafee.com writes:
Any ideas why we would be receiving this cache lookup failed message?
PostgreSQL 8.3.7 64 bit, RHEL 5 64 bit OS
[ query applying pg_table_is_visible() to most of pg_class ]
Is it repeatable, or just something that shows up occasionally with
On Thursday 11 February 2010 1:57:39 am Albe Laurenz wrote:
u235sentinel wrote:
I have a strange problem we noticed the other day with
triggers. We're
running 8.3.3 on Solaris 10 (intel) and have a feed that comes in
regularly to populate a table we're working on. The feed works just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
No, but I imagine we still would encourage people to run the latest revision
of it. Come this time next year, I hope that we'll tell people on 7.4.2 to
Do we really, officially, care?
Well, yes, we certainly should. Just because a branch
Thanks for this hint, I already got it to work in the meantime.
My approach now (based on the fact, that PointND is indeed a variable length
type) is to have the following structure:
struct Range
{
int vl_len_;
struct PointND limits[1];
};
whereas now vl_len_ stores the total size
Bump
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Moe mohamed5432154...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to figure out how I can introduce full text search tips...
tips meaning, like if you start typing Mer ..
then a box with a couple of words underneath comes up, with *Mercedes,
Mercury *and so on :P
I am
-Original Message-
From: u235sentinel [mailto:u235senti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:15 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Postgres Triggers issue
I have a strange problem we noticed the other day with
triggers. We're running 8.3.3 on Solaris
On 05/02/10 15:48, Moe wrote:
I am trying to figure out how I can introduce full text search tips...
tips meaning, like if you start typing Mer ..
then a box with a couple of words underneath comes up, with *Mercedes,
Mercury *and so on :P
I am thinking that the word suggestions needs to come
If I do:
pg_dump -a --disable-triggers
I get a warning message:
pg_dump: NOTICE: there are circular foreign-key constraints among these
table(s):
pg_dump: directory
pg_dump: You may not be able to restore the dump without using
--disable-triggers or temporarily dropping the constraints.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
On 05/02/10 15:48, Moe wrote:
I am trying to figure out how I can introduce full text search tips...
tips meaning, like if you start typing Mer ..
then a box with a couple of words underneath comes up, with *Mercedes,
In response to Igor Neyman :
CREATE TRIGGER tafter
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE
ON r.m_a
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE r.m_t();
Trigger function for an insert/update trigger should return NEW, not
NULL (OLD - for on delete trigger):
It's an AFTER TRIGGER, so the RETURN-Value
On 11/02/10 17:11, Moe wrote:
You might want to summarize down to a separate (word,frequency) table.
Particularly if you don't want stemming to interfere with your suggestions.
Stemming is ok. That's fine.
How would this normally be implemented? Should I go through my text word by
word
A. Kretschmer andreas.kretsch...@schollglas.com wrote:
In response to Igor Neyman :
CREATE TRIGGER tafter
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE
ON r.m_a
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE r.m_t();
Trigger function for an insert/update trigger should return NEW, not
NULL (OLD - for
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:39 +0900, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
Dear Folks;
A very serious bug was reported on pg_lesslog. So far, I found it's
a bug in pg_compresslog. Please do not use pg_compresslog and
pg_decompresslog until improved version is uploaded.
I strongly advise to take base
On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
Ben Chobot wrote:
I'm looking at pg_stat_user_tables in 8.4.2, and I'm confused about
n_live_tup. Shouldn't that be at least fairly close to (n_tup_ins -
n_tup-del)? It doesn't seem to be, but I'm unclear why.
Insert 2000 tuples.
Delete
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
If I do:
pg_dump -a --disable-triggers
I get a warning message:
pg_dump: NOTICE: there are circular foreign-key constraints among these
table(s):
pg_dump: directory
pg_dump: You may not be able to restore the
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:39 +0900, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
Dear Folks;
A very serious bug was reported on pg_lesslog. So far, I found it's
a bug in pg_compresslog. Please do not use pg_compresslog and
pg_decompresslog until improved version is uploaded.
I
I have a question regaring delete truncate versus a drop of the tables and
recreating it.
We have a database that gets recreated each week that is 31 GB in size.
The way that it is currently being done is to truncate all of the tables.
I would like to confirm.
Because both
Ben Campbell wrote:
I _think_ the reason it takes so long is that postgresql doesn't
modify rows in place - it creates an entry for the modified row and
zaps the old one. So by touching _every_ row I'm basically forcing it
to rebuild my whole database... I've got about 2 million rows in
Ben Chobot be...@silentmedia.com writes:
And unfortunately, Tom, we're not resetting stats counters. :(
Mph. Well, the other thing that comes to mind is that n_live_tup
(and n_dead_tup) is typically updated by ANALYZE, but only to an
estimate based on ANALYZE's partial sample of the table. If
Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com writes:
If I do:
pg_dump -a --disable-triggers
I get a warning message:
pg_dump: NOTICE: there are circular foreign-key constraints among these
table(s):
pg_dump: directory
pg_dump: You may not be able to restore the dump without using
Hello,
I need help with the an advanced SQL JOIN. I think that I can get this
accomplished with a LEFT JOIN... perhaps some of you may be able to offer
guidance in this... I appreciate any suggestions you may have.
Consider the following SQL statement:
SELECT customerid, count(disctint
Dear Folks;
A very serious bug was reported on pg_lesslog. So far, I found it's
a bug in pg_compresslog. Please do not use pg_compresslog and
pg_decompresslog until improved version is uploaded.
I strongly advise to take base backup of your database.
I apologize for inconvenience. I'll
Greg Smith wrote:
Jeff Ross wrote:
pgbench is run with this:
pgbench -h varley.openvistas.net -U _postgresql -t 2 -c $SCALE
pgbench
with scale starting at 10 and then incrementing by 10. I call it
three times for each scale. I've turned on logging to 'all' to try
and help figure out
Trigger function for an insert/update trigger should return NEW, not
NULL (OLD - for on delete trigger):
It's an AFTER TRIGGER, so the RETURN-Value ignored.
According the doc:
The return value of a BEFORE or AFTER statement-level trigger or an
AFTER row-level trigger is always
I'm still having trouble making this work:
http://pgsql.privatepaste.com/14a6d3075e
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION tsvector_to_tsquery(IN tsv tsvector, op
IN char(1), weights IN varchar(4), maxpos IN smallint
)
RETURNS tsquery
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME'
LANGUAGE C STRICT;
In response to Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
If I do:
pg_dump -a --disable-triggers
I get a warning message:
pg_dump: NOTICE: there are circular foreign-key constraints among these
table(s):
Neil Stlyz wrote:
Now... here is the problem I am having... the above SQL query is
retrieving results from one table: sales
I have another table called customers with a couple of fields
(customerid, and customername are two of the fields).
I want to join on the customerid in both tables to
On 02/11/2010 11:08 AM, u235sentinel wrote:
Trigger function for an insert/update trigger should return NEW, not
NULL (OLD - for on delete trigger):
It's an AFTER TRIGGER, so the RETURN-Value ignored.
According the doc:
The return value of a BEFORE or AFTER statement-level trigger or an
On 9 February 2010 02:55, Marc Lustig m...@marclustig.com wrote:
Due to a server issue we needed a reinstallation of Ubuntu along with a
downgrade to Ubuntu Hardy.
So this is what we did:
- copied all from /var/lib/postgresql/8.4/main/ to the new server
/var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/
-
Export/import is the only option.
Or upgrade PostgreSQL to 8.4 on the downgraded server.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@killerbytes.com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Is there a setting that will give me a more verbose log message when a deadlock
is detected?
currently, i just get Error: Deadlock Detected but it doesn't tell me the
tables involved.
Thanks
Dave
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:50 PM, David Kerr d...@mr-paradox.net wrote:
currently, i just get Error: Deadlock Detected but it doesn't tell me the
tables involved.
Where do you see this? The postgres log file surely has more details.
Also, what version etc. etc.
--
Sent via pgsql-general
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Chris Barnes
compuguruchrisbar...@hotmail.com wrote:
Because both truncate and delete, I would think that this action would be
put into the pg_log as a log file that can be rolled back. And, when
complete, it would be shipped to the standby to be processed?
Thank you very much for the advice. Yes I think it should go to
announce. I will post a message.
--
Koichi Suzuki
2010/2/12 Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:39 +0900, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
Dear Folks;
A very serious bug was
Hi All,
I'm trying to retrieve the count of notes associated for each
transactions for table energy_transactions.
But I seem to be getting (after the join) the sum of amount x count of
notes. Can someone enlighten me with this problem?
Here's the query that I am working with.
select
On 11/02/10 22:53, Greenhorn wrote:
But I seem to be getting (after the join) the sum of amount x count of
notes. Can someone enlighten me with this problem?
select
energy_accounts_id, count(note)
,sum(case when t.fin_year = 2010 and t.fin_quarter = 1
then t.total_amount else 0
Chris Barnes wrote:
Because both truncate and delete, I would think that this action would
be put into the pg_log as a log file that can be rolled back. And,
when complete, it would be shipped to the standby to be processed?
You would be wrong -- truncate does not log the full data, only the
The alter index page does not show the lock mode, but it seems it is an
ACCESS EXCLUSIVE.
Wouldn't an EXCLUSIVE lock be more appropriate and remove the index from
planner consideration?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:01:37PM -0500, Vick Khera wrote:
- On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:50 PM, David Kerr d...@mr-paradox.net wrote:
- currently, i just get Error: Deadlock Detected but it doesn't tell me the
tables involved.
-
-
- Where do you see this? The postgres log file surely has more
On 12 February 2010 10:28, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
On 11/02/10 22:53, Greenhorn wrote:
But I seem to be getting (after the join) the sum of amount x count of
notes. Can someone enlighten me with this problem?
select
energy_accounts_id, count(note)
,sum(case when
Adrian Klaver wrote:
Well that would depend on any number of factors. Without information
on how the feed is being done or more detailed logs it is hard to say
for sure. At a guess though, I would say it is because the 'feed' is
being done wrapped in a transaction and when the trigger
Hi. I'm setting up a new workstation (Win7 64bit Quad Core 4GB) with
Postgres, for development work, and trying to pick which version I
should install. Most of the time, Postgres is dormant - I'm not using
it all - but when I do use it, the load can be high, and I want
maximum performance.
Is
Adrian Klaver wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 1:57:39 am Albe Laurenz wrote:
u235sentinel wrote:
I have a strange problem we noticed the other day with
triggers. We're
running 8.3.3 on Solaris 10 (intel) and have a feed that comes in
regularly to populate a table we're working on.
Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com writes:
I want to find all records where any element of lst like 'j%'.
This does not work...
select * from foo where 'j%' like any(lst);
Intuitively, you'd think
select * from foo where any(lst) like 'j%';
... but that's a syntax error.
Yeah, the
Hi:
create table foo (lst text[]);
insert into foo (lst) values (array['jack','fred','jen','sue']);
I want to find all records where any element of lst like 'j%'.
This does not work...
select * from foo where 'j%' like any(lst);
Intuitively, you'd think
select * from foo where any(lst)
93 matches
Mail list logo
