FYI, Postgresql caps for sale on ebay at http://www.ebay.com/itm/162564660418
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Brazilian users,
The mailing list pgbr-geral has been discontinued?
Hi I have a question, Is possible to create a shared-storage postgresql server
cluster? I found some mix responses online.
Thank you very much,
Lexi
This electronic mail communication may contain privileged, confidential, and/or
proprietary information which is the property of The Atkins
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 10:21 -0500, Bijelic, Aleksandra (Lexi) wrote:
Is possible to create a shared-storage postgresql server cluster?
If you want both nodes as active, then you need to use Postgres-XC:
http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/
If you want active/passive solution, then you can
Mailing list ?
Yes. Yes it is.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Mohamed mohamed5432154...@gmail.com wrote:
Mailing list ?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
+kFWuKQV
=xNYA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Hello everybody. What started as a question about Practical PostgreSQL
has ballooned into a project to create another documentation resource,
compiled entirely from mailing list archives. While discussing
documentation in the general list I realized that the resource I had
learned the most
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:10:07 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody. What started as a question about Practical
PostgreSQL has ballooned into a project to create another
[snip]
I generally tend to write stuff that was not clear on my website.
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:10:07 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody. What started as a question about Practical
PostgreSQL has ballooned into a project to create another
[snip]
I generally tend to write stuff that was not clear on my
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 19:05:01 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-es-ayuda/2006-10/msg00565.php
The one you sent me is from ~2 hours after the original post:
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:12:53 -0300
The
Hi,
Is there a problem on the mail lists? I've been getting these messages
for a couple of days, one for each and every message that is posted to
the pgsql-es-ayuda list. It says executed with failure, but the mail
is certainly delivered. The archives also appear to be working, so I'm
not sure
--- Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a problem on the mail lists?
I know I noticed ~18 hrs delays for my emails to post on the PG-sql list.
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In order to debug issues that both Josh and I have noticed, where some postings
aren't getting to the list by some ppl, Ihave enabled 'inform post' on the
lists which will send you, as moderator for pgsql-es-ayuda, an email letting
you know that a
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In order to debug issues that both Josh and I have noticed, where some
postings
aren't getting to the list by some ppl, Ihave enabled 'inform post' on the
lists which will send you, as moderator for pgsql-es-ayuda,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 15:54:41 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway I wonder why it does report failure, when the messages do make
it through the list to all subscribers and the archives. Shouldn't it
report success
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 15:54:41 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway I wonder why it does report failure, when the messages do make
it through the list to all subscribers and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'k, the message you sent had:
was executed with status:
0 (failure)
which indicates it failed ... do you have a corresponding URL @ archives that
shows that it did go through that I can check against?
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 18:44:52
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'k, the message you sent had:
was executed with status:
0 (failure)
which indicates it failed ... do you have a corresponding URL @ archives that
shows that it did go through that I can check against?
Well,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 19:05:01 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-es-ayuda/2006-10/msg00565.php
The one you sent me is from ~2 hours after the original post:
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006
Marc,
Mailing lists are showing an ungodly slowness. To the tune of 2 hours for
things to show up. What's up?
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive
Looking into it ... server is quiet, and from the headers, the
anti-virus/spam stuff is causing neglible delay ... last time this
happened, it turned out to be a bad subscribe address in the list, so will
be searchign through that next ...
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Marc,
It seems that all the postgresql mailing lists don't allow you to
automatically reply to the list only the sender. I don't get this with
all my other mailings list. Who I contact to have this rectified?
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
www.flashdev.org.au
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Chris Velevitch wrote:
It seems that all the postgresql mailing lists don't allow you to
automatically reply to the list only the sender. I don't get this with
all my other mailings list. Who I contact to have this rectified?
What do you mean? Do you mean a Reply-To:
Chris Velevitch wrote:
It seems that all the postgresql mailing lists don't allow you to
automatically reply to the list only the sender. I don't get this
with all my other mailings list. Who I contact to have this
rectified?
Done on purpose. Use reply to all.
--
Guy Rouillier
On 4/27/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean? Do you mean a Reply-To: header added? If so, check out
the help docs, but there is a 'set replyto' you can add that will have it
added for your email address, without affecting everyone that doesn't want
it ...
help
On 4/27/06, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done on purpose. Use reply to all.
Isn't that a bad habit to get into? There's been a lot of press about
people who habitually reply all.
Besides, isn't the point of a mailing list is that it's a global
public discussion on a topic in which
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Chris Velevitch wrote:
In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
So what's the reasoning behind this choice?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Kris Jurka
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:34:11PM +1000, Chris Velevitch wrote:
In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
So what's the reasoning behind this choice?
All sorts of reasons. One of the main ones
On 4/27/06, Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
So what's the reasoning behind this choice?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The author
On 4/27/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
Fortunatly we have a mailing list manager that allows you to choose
which way you want it.
Please explain what you mean by this?
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
www.flashdev.org.au
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:59:19PM +1000, Chris Velevitch wrote:
On 4/27/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
Fortunatly we have a mailing list manager that allows you to choose
which way you want it.
Please explain what you mean by this?
Go to the archives:
On 4/27/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
Go to the archives:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
Select To subscribe or unsubscribe
Goto Sign-in and Sign in
Goto Unsubscribe or Change Settings and tick (I beleive) replyto.
Have a nice day,
Thanks for that
Chris Velevitch wrote:
On 4/27/06, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done on purpose. Use reply to all.
Isn't that a bad habit to get into? There's been a lot of press about
people who habitually reply all.
Besides, isn't the point of a mailing list is that it's a global
public
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 17:34:11 +1000,
Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/27/06, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done on purpose. Use reply to all.
Isn't that a bad habit to get into? There's been a lot of press about
people who habitually reply all.
Reply all is the
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 17:22:09 +1000,
Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/27/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean? Do you mean a Reply-To: header added? If so, check out
the help docs, but there is a 'set replyto' you can add that will have it
added
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 18:44:25 +1000,
Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One day I accidentally sent a private, personal reply out over one of
my own damn lists.
It's like he accidentally drove down a one way street in the wrong
direction, so he now drives everywhere in reverse,
Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
You may think it's not the norm, but you're mistaken. This is how the
PG lists are run, as well as most other
Hi all,
My searches at:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
haven't been working for the last couple hours; the query times out.
Is this my problem or a real one?
-Kevin
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
Tried both that URL, and a search, and both appear to be responding for me
...
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Kevin Murphy wrote:
Hi all,
My searches at:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
haven't been working for the last couple hours; the query times out.
Is this my problem or a real one?
I've not seen a post in days on many of the lists to which I subscribe.
--Rick
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've not seen a post in days on many of the lists to which I subscribe.
--Rick
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:00:29 -0500,
Kevin Barnard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SELECT trim(leading '0' from to_char(now(), 'HH:MM AM'))
I think is what you really want. This gets rid of the nasty leasing 0.
Won't that be a problem for times between and 0059?
Hello-
I am in the process of translating a site using mysql as the backend over to postgres. I have a lot of time data that I would like to display to the user in the form of a schedule.
I am using the to_char function to make the times human friendly
to_char(class_schedule.endtime,
* Todd P Marek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have looked through the documentation and haven't found anything to
do this in postgres. I am going to have to do this formating in the
application layer?
If nothing else I'd think you could create your own function in Postgres
to display the time
I would thought it would be an obvious try:
cnagy= select to_char(now(), 'HH:MM AM');
to_char
--
04:10 PM
(1 row)
HTH,
Csaba.
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 16:32, Todd P Marek wrote:
Hello-
I am in the process of translating a site using mysql as the
backendover to postgres. I have a
Todd P Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am using the to_char function to make the times human friendly
to_char(class_schedule.endtime, 'HH:MI:SS AM')
which returns
06:30:00 AM - 07:30:00 AM
I am really looking to get it outputting like this.
6:30 AM - 7:30 AM
I have
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Todd P Marek wrote:
Hello-
I am in the process of translating a site using mysql as the backend
over to postgres. I have a lot of time data that I would like to
display to the user in the form of a schedule.
I am using the to_char function to make the times human
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 09:32 -0500, Todd P Marek wrote:
__
Hello-
I am in the process of translating a site using mysql as the backend
over to postgres. I have a lot of time data that I would like to
display to the
SELECT trim(leading '0' from to_char(now(), 'HH:MM AM'))
I think is what you really want. This gets rid of the nasty leasing 0.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
On Oct 5, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Kevin Barnard wrote:
SELECT trim(leading '0' from to_char(now(), 'HH:MM AM'))
I think is what you really want. This gets rid of the nasty leasing 0.
I wasn't even paying attention to the seconds. I was in fact talking
about the leading 0.
Thanks to everyone and
Hey, I didn't know trim is so flexible... cool !
Cheers,
Csaba.
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 17:00, Kevin Barnard wrote:
SELECT trim(leading '0' from to_char(now(), 'HH:MM AM'))
I think is what you really want. This gets rid of the nasty leasing 0.
---(end of
Going back to the documents I think Tom's answer of prepending FM is
better then mine.Look at table 9-22 for other options
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:06:51 -0500, Todd P Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 5, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Kevin Barnard wrote:
SELECT trim(leading '0' from
I receive the error message Try to compose a less restrictive search
query or check spelling regardless of search term when attempting to
search the list PgSQL - General via the mailing list archive search
form at:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
---(end
Kevin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I receive the error message Try to compose a less restrictive search query or
check spelling regardless of search term when attempting to search the list
PgSQL - General via the mailing list archive search form at:
Try leaving the For files modified
Tom Lane wrote:
Csaba Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
I have the impression that these Postgres vs MySQL vs XXX stuff is
regularly started up by newcomers to this
From: Jonathan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We need a Postgres vs MySQL Mailing list :)
you are going to laugh but I don't think that this is such a bad idea,
provided that it is not limited to Postgres vs MySQL. Advocacy is good and
all, but they are more interested in promoting PostgreSQL than
why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Chris Travers wrote:
From: Jonathan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We need a Postgres vs MySQL Mailing list :)
you are going to laugh but I don't think that this is such a bad idea,
provided that it is
why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
I would suggest that we consider forming a pgsql-competitive email
list for
Whatever, but using another mailing is definitely an excellent idea. I
actually stopped reading -general recently because it got bogged down
in yet
Hi all,
I have the impression that these Postgres vs MySQL vs XXX stuff is
regularly started up by newcomers to this list. So wherever you will
decide to move it, it will still pop up here - the new-comers will know
nothing about being elsewhere, except it is called something very-very
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Francois Suter wrote:
why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
I would suggest that we consider forming a pgsql-competitive email
list for
Whatever, but using another mailing is definitely an excellent idea. I
actually stopped reading
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Csaba Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
I have the impression that these Postgres vs MySQL vs XXX stuff is
regularly started up by
Well, the idea of mailing list is to exchange information and help
each other.
Obviously if few great things happen on some mailing list and others
don't come
to know it, defeats the purpose of having a mailing list.
I agree. This is one of my worries. If nothing happens on the French
list, it
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:40:31PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
On 19 Aug 2003 at 10:01, Francois Suter wrote:
I am pleased to announce the start of a PostgreSQL general mailing list
in French. Its name is pgsql-fr-generale. I hope many of you will join
it so that we can make
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, but there's not too much you can do about it. You can check what
goes on in the spanish list at
http://tlali.iztacala.unam.mx/mailman/listinfo/pgsql-ayuda
There's a respectable amount of traffic, and I don't think there's
anyone who would want
I'd be glad to join, but I couldn't find where or how to subscribe...
It's not yet posted on the web site, but you can subscribe by sending a
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], leave the subject line blank and put
in the body SUBSCRIBE pgsql-fr-generale.
Bye
---
Francois
Home page:
Le Mardi 19 Août 2003 15:27, Erwan DUROSELLE a écrit :
I'd be glad to join, but I couldn't find where or how to subscribe...
Juste send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
subscribe pgsql-fr-generale
in your email's body.
--
Guillaume !-- http://absfr.tuxfamily.org/ --.
Le Mardi 19 Août 2003 15:35, Francois Suter a écrit :
I'd be glad to join, but I couldn't find where or how to subscribe...
It's not yet posted on the web site, but you can subscribe by sending a
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], leave the subject line blank and put
in the body SUBSCRIBE
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Maas
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 3:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [GENERAL] mailing list
Hi,
this mailing list has lots of traffic (about 50 messages a day).
Wouldn't it be more convenient to turn it into a news group? I have
Does an archive of the various pgsql- mailing lists exist? If so,
would you be so kind as to tell me how to access them?
Thank you,
John McKown
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, John McKown wrote:
Does an archive of the various pgsql- mailing lists exist? If so,
would you be so kind as to tell me how to access them?
Go to the website. Choose Info Central then Mailing Lists. They all
should be listed, but I haven't checked yet to make sure.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, John McKown wrote:
Does an archive of the various pgsql- mailing lists exist? If so,
would you be so kind as to tell me how to access them?
Go to the website. Choose Info Central then Mailing Lists. They all
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Johann [iso-8859-1] Höchtl wrote:
Hi!
I subscribed to the pgsql mailing-list digest version. But since friday i
don't get the digest but every single mail. For me, this is very annoying !
Ditto,
Geoff Russell
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Me too,can anyone do something please?
- Original Message -
From: "Johann Höchtl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 8:31 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] Mailing list defective ?
Hi!
I subscribed to the pgsql mailing-list digest version. But sinc
?
- Original Message -
From: "Johann Höchtl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 8:31 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] Mailing list defective ?
Hi!
I subscribed to the pgsql mailing-list digest version. But since friday i
don't get the digest but every s
I just fixed the script that creates the links for the mailing list
archives off of each 'list' page (the 'mbox' link), so that it has the
proper name...
Any other problems, let us know...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @
Morning...
In order to try and make the mailing list archives a little more useful,
and manageable, I'm in the process of re-working them.
For starters, the lists are broken down into a month period, vs one great
big continuous list. It basically means that you can now look at the last
78 matches
Mail list logo
