On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
any other large sites use postgresql? i need to make right descission coz my
decision will affect business that is related with $
The people who run the .info and .org domains... Lots more. google
is your friend.
--
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
any other large sites use postgresql? i need to make right descission coz my
decision will affect business that is related with $
The people
?
From: Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com
To: Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] POSTGRESQL Newbie
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
scott,
thanks for quick response you mean all the dowmain .info and .org domains
are using postgresql?
I am pretty sure he means the top level domains (registration, root
DNS server updates, etc) are all run off
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 00:04 -0700, Geek Matter a écrit :
how about postgresql? does it has free graphical tools for modeling,
replication ?
In your original post, you wrote : for our large web apps; if that
really is the case, I suggest you invest some time into learning the
command
@postgresql.org pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] POSTGRESQL Newbie
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 00:04 -0700, Geek Matter a écrit :
how about postgresql? does it has free graphical tools for modeling,
replication ?
In your original
Geek Matter wrote:
Skype. And pgsql has some great replication solutions that actually
work
any other large sites use postgresql? i need to make right descission
coz my decision will affect
business that is related with $
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2002-08/msg5.php
: [GENERAL] POSTGRESQL Newbie
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 00:04 -0700, Geek Matter a écrit :
how about postgresql? does it has free graphical tools for modeling,
replication ?
In your original post, you wrote : for our large web apps; if that
really is the case, I suggest you invest some time
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
i just wondering, why mysql is more popular than postgresql ?
Pretty blonde girls doing marketing
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 02:49 -0600, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda a
écrit :
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
i just wondering, why mysql is more popular than postgresql ?
Pretty blonde girls doing marketing
Not sure about that, but it would not
2012/3/21 Vincent Veyron vv.li...@wanadoo.fr:
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 02:49 -0600, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda a
écrit :
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
i just wondering, why mysql is more popular than postgresql ?
Pretty blonde girls doing
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
i just wondering, why mysql is more popular than postgresql ?
PHP and MySQL go together nicely. Both of them allow, even encourage,
sloppinesses of various sorts, and it's really easy to make yourself a
dynamic web page
[Forwarded to the list]
---BeginMessage---
Essentially they were a bigger earlier, and a little bit louder, and
created an initial following, which in turn got more articles and books
being published, more products being written for, and therefore they gained
the mind share or momentum or buzz.
What's with you guys? you're the second one in 7 minutes to email me
instead of the list ( just teasing ;-)
Regarding your question: I'm surprised you asked, or was it in jest?
Anyway, a bit a history is visible here :
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/history.html
--
Vincent Veyron
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:10, Vincent Veyron vv.li...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
However, I once read that the real reason is that mysql was available
when ISPs came of existence, circa 1995. It lacked important features of
an RDBMS (you can google the details), but it was enough to satisfy the
needs
Am 21.03.2012 12:35, schrieb Marti Raudsepp:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:10, Vincent Veyron vv.li...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
However, I once read that the real reason is that mysql was available
when ISPs came of existence, circa 1995. It lacked important features of
an RDBMS (you can google the
Marti Raudsepp, 21.03.2012 12:35:
E.g. VACUUM/ANALYZE needed to be ran manually and it used to take an
*exclusive* lock on tables, for longish periods, preventing any
queries! Failure to vacuum would cause the files to bloat without
limit and slow down your queries gradually. In the worst case,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:35:31PM +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
Let's not forget that PostgreSQL sucked, too, back then.
Well, for some values of sucked. But I don't believe VACUUM was the
main issue. In particular,
wrong, it would bog down all your hardware resources. MySQL lacked
many
In short, MySQL offered the appearance of ease of use, which meant you
didn't need a DBA or even, really, to read the manual. For most
people it was good enough. It turned out that once you started trying
to scale it, you really did need all those features that the MySQL
3.2.3 and earlier
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
scott,
thanks for quick response you mean all the dowmain .info and .org domains
are using postgresql?
my background from SQL server which has powerful graphical tools for data
modeling, replication, and etc.
how
I didn't catch this when it went by the first time, so sorry to have
missed it (and for the deep quoting):
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:20:02AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
scott,
thanks for quick response you mean all
folks,
i am newbie in prosgretsql i am in midst of making decission of which database
techology shoould i choose for our large web apps. mysql or postgresql?
could you share larges sites who are implemented Posgtresql successfully in
term of replication, clustering, scale, and etc. I heard
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
folks,
i am newbie in prosgretsql i am in midst of making decission of which
database techology shoould i choose for our large web apps. mysql or
postgresql?
could you share larges sites who are implemented Posgtresql
@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] POSTGRESQL Newbie
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Geek Matter geekmat...@yahoo.com wrote:
folks,
i am newbie in prosgretsql i am in midst of making decission of which
database techology shoould i choose for our
24 matches
Mail list logo
