Hello Ryohei-san,
About the backend v11 patch.
Patch applies cleanly, though compiles with a warning.
Make check ok, although the feature is not tested.
I'm okay with exposing this parameter.
Documentation:
ISTM this is not about libpq connections but about TCP connections. There
can be non
Hi,
the part that hurts in terms or performances is:
if (jstate.clocations_count > 0)
pgss_store(pstate->p_sourcetext,
query->queryId,
query->stmt_location,
query->stmt_len,
On 25/03/2019 20:13, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Attached is the remainder of the patch rebased to current head.
I stared at the new test case for a while, and I must say it looks very
cryptic. It's not exactly this patch's fault - all the pgbench tests are
cryptic - but I think we need to do someth
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 21:04, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:31:48AM +0100, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> >On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 00:06, Tomas Vondra
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> attached is an updated patch, fixing and slightly tweaking the docs.
> >>
> >>
> >> Barring objections,
On 2019/03/27 15:48, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Sorry if this was discussed before, but why does this patch add any new
> code to partprune.c? AFAICT, there's no functionality changes to the
> pruning code.
>
> Both
>
> +bool
> +partkey_is_bool_constant_for_query(RelOptInfo *partrel, i
At Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:28:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote
in
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:40 PM Ideriha, Takeshi
> wrote:
> > Just to be sure, we introduced the LRU list in this thread to find the
> > entries less than threshold time
> > without scanning the whole hash table. If hash table becomes
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:55 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> If you keep asking for txid_status(txid_current() + 1) in new
> transactions, you eventually hit:
>
> ERROR: could not access status of transaction 32768
> DETAIL: Could not read from file "pg_xact/" at offset 8192: No error: 0.
> -
Hello,
On 3/27/19 7:05 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
Why are both of these checked? ISTM once xact_is_sampled is set, we
ought not to respect a different value of log_xact_sample_rate for the
rest of that transaction.
I added theses checks to allow to disable logging during a sampled
transaction,
Hello Heikki,
I stared at the new test case for a while, and I must say it looks very
cryptic. It's not exactly this patch's fault - all the pgbench tests are
cryptic -
Perl is cryptic. Regexprs are cryptic.
but I think we need to do something about that before adding any more
tests. I'm
Hi!
Here's new version of GiST amcheck, which takes into account recently committed
GiST VACUUM.
It tests that deleted pages do not contain any data.
Also, Heikki's fix applied (wrong OffsetNumberNext(i) replaced by
OffsetNumberNext(o)).
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
0001-GiST-verif
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:21 AM legrand legrand
wrote:
>
> here is a new version:
>
> - "track_planning" GUC added
> to permit to keep previous behavior unchanged
good
> - trailing whitespaces and comments wider than 80 characters
> not fixed
why? In case it's not cle
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 26.03.2019, 19:23 +0100 schrieb Michael Banck:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.03.2019, 10:30 -0700 schrieb Andres Freund:
> > On 2019-03-26 18:22:55 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > /*
> > > - * Only check pages which have not been
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:06 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:32 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alexander Korotkov writes:
> > > Got access to that buildfarm animal thanks to Tom Turelinckx. Now
> > > running check-world in a loop on the same commit hash with same build
> > > op
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:58 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:23 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Looks good.
I did some testing and proof-reading and made a few minor changes:
* I tidied up the code that serialises transaction state. It was
already hammering round pegs into
Thanks for putting up with a new reviewer!
--with-libxml is the PostgreSQL configure option to make it use libxml2.
>
> The very web page http://xmlsoft.org/index.html says "The XML C parser
> and toolkit of Gnome: libxml" and is all about libxml2.
>
> So I think I was unsure what conven
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:53 AM Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:08 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> As part of this thread, maybe we can
>> just fix the case of the parallel cooperating transaction.
>
>
> With the current patch, all the parallel implementation transaction are
> ge
Re: Daniel Gustafsson 2019-03-26
> 0003 - Make -B default to CWD and remove the exec_path check
>
> Defaulting to CWD for the new bindir has the side effect that the default
> sockdir is in the bin/ directory which may be less optimal.
Hmm, I would have thought that the default for the new bind
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 22:23, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Here's v6 of this patch. I have rebased on top of today's CLUSTER
> monitoring, as well as on table AM commits. The latter caused a bit of
> trouble, as now the number of blocks processed by a scan is not as easy
> to get as before; I added
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 20:27, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > It looks like the best place to fix it is in
> > get_policies_for_relation(), since that's where all the policies to be
> > applied for a given RTE are pulled together. Patch attached.
>
>
On 27/03/2019 13:44, Thomas Munro wrote:
* I tidied up the code that serialises transaction state. It was
already hammering round pegs into square holes, and the previous patch
made that even worse, so I added a new struct
SerializedTransactionState to do this properly.
Ah, good, it used to be
On 3/27/19 10:22 AM, Adrien NAYRAT wrote:
Hello,
On 3/27/19 7:05 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
Why are both of these checked? ISTM once xact_is_sampled is set, we
ought not to respect a different value of log_xact_sample_rate for the
rest of that transaction.
I added theses checks to allow to dis
Many of these are gone in the modern PostgreSQL, a few remain.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/disco/amd64/postgresql-client-11/filelist
/usr/lib/postgresql/11/bin/clusterdb
/usr/lib/postgresql/11/bin/createdb
/usr/lib/postgresql/11/bin/createuser
/usr/lib/postgresql/11/bin/dropdb
/usr/lib/postgresql/
On 2019-Mar-27, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 03/26/19 21:39, Ryan Lambert wrote:
> > Should this be clarified as the libxml2 library? That's what I installed
> > to build postgres from source (Ubuntu 16/18). If it is the libxml library
> > and the "2" is irrelevant
>
> That's a good catch. I'm no
Hello Heikki,
Indeed, yet again, I forgot the attachement:-(
I stared at the new test case for a while, and I must say it looks very
cryptic. It's not exactly this patch's fault - all the pgbench tests are
cryptic -
Perl is cryptic. Regexprs are cryptic.
but I think we need to do something
Alexander Korotkov writes:
> Still no reproduction.
Annoying, but it's probably not worth expending more effort on
right now. I wonder whether that buildfarm animal can be upgraded
to capture core dump stack traces --- if so, then if it happens
again we'd have more info.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:31:14PM +0100, Fred .Flintstone wrote:
Many of these are gone in the modern PostgreSQL, a few remain.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/disco/amd64/postgresql-client-11/filelist
/usr/lib/postgresql/11/bin/clusterdb
/usr/lib/postgresql/11/bin/createdb
/usr/lib/postgresql/11/b
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2019, 10:49 +0900 schrieb Michael Paquier:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:23:17PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > The current version prints a newline when it progress reporting is
> > toggled off. Do you mean there is a hazard that this happens right when
> > we are printi
Re: To Tom Lane 2019-03-26 <20190326151446.gg3...@msg.df7cb.de>
> I run a benchmark with checksums disabled/enabled. shared_buffers is
> 512kB to make sure almost any read will fetch the page from the OS
> cache; scale factor is 50 (~750MB) to make sure the whole cluster fits
> into RAM.
[...]
> So
On 2019-Mar-27, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
> that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
> pg_ prefix, and it's a completely different thing to rename existing ones.
> That has inherent costs, and as T
It does not matter if they are in a different directory, because when
I use tab-completion in the shell, then all commands show.
I type "create" then "createdb" and "createuser" shows up. This
is very confusing, and I don't know if this creates a Linux system
user account or a PostgreSQL account. W
Hello,
at the very least my Ubuntu Cosmic has createdb, createuser and createlang
in user's space, and I had at least two cases when people were trying to
use createuser to create a new OS user.
I would prefer them having pg_ prefix to have less confusion.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:51 PM Tomas V
On 3/27/19 2:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
pg_ prefix, and it's a completely different thing to rename existing ones.
That has inherent costs, and as Tom
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:00:18AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2019-Mar-27, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
pg_ prefix, and it's a completely different thing
Hi,
On 3/26/19 5:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
As I said before, I'm thinking of getting rid of the whole business of
checking partitions on the referenced side of an FK at DROP time, and
instead jut forbid the DROP completely if any FKs reference an ancestor
of that partition.
Will that allow
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2019-Mar-27, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
>> that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
>> pg_ prefix, and it's a completely different thing to rename existing ones.
>> That
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:07:24PM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
On 3/27/19 2:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
pg_ prefix, and it's a completely different
Hallo Michael,
About patch v12:
Patch applies cleanly, compiles. make check ok, but feature is not tested.
Doc build ok.
Although I'm in favor of it, I'm not sure that the signal think will make
it for 12. Maybe it is worth compromising, doing a simple version for now,
and resubmitting th
On 3/27/19 3:26 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
That is true, of course. But are there actual examples of such conflicts
in practice? I mean, are there tools/packages that provide commands with
a conflicting name? I'm not aware of any, and as was pointed before, we'd
have ~20 years of history on any new
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:49 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov writes:
> > Still no reproduction.
>
> Annoying, but it's probably not worth expending more effort on
> right now. I wonder whether that buildfarm animal can be upgraded
> to capture core dump stack traces --- if so, then if it
Andreas Karlsson writes:
> On 3/27/19 3:26 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> That is true, of course. But are there actual examples of such conflicts
>> in practice? I mean, are there tools/packages that provide commands with
>> a conflicting name? I'm not aware of any, and as was pointed before, we'd
>>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 05:37:40PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:49 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Alexander Korotkov writes:
> Still no reproduction.
Annoying, but it's probably not worth expending more effort on
right now. I wonder whether that buildfarm animal can be upgr
On 2019-Mar-27, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > On 2019-Mar-27, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >> I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
> >> that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
> >> pg_ prefix, and it's a completely diffe
David Rowley writes:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 18:39, Amit Langote
> wrote:
>> On 2019/03/27 14:26, David Rowley wrote:
>>> Perhaps the way to make this work, at least in the long term is to do
>>> in the planner what we did in the executor in d73f4c74dd34.
>> Maybe you meant 9ddef36278a9?
> Pro
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 15:07 +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> [EXTERNAL SOURCE]
>
>
>
> On 3/27/19 2:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
> > that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
> > pg_ prefix,
Pushed, thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Hi,
thanks again for your review!
Am Mittwoch, den 27.03.2019, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Fabien COELHO:
> Hallo Michael,
>
> About patch v12:
>
> Patch applies cleanly, compiles. make check ok, but feature is not tested.
> Doc build ok.
>
> Although I'm in favor of it, I'm not sure that the signal
On 3/27/19 2:40 AM, Eric Hanson wrote:
> What would be the implications of adding a NO RESET clause to SET LOCAL
> ROLE?
There's a part of this that seems to be a special case of the
GUC-protected-by-cookie idea discussed a bit in [1] and [2]
(which is still an idea that I like).
Regards,
-Chap
On 3/27/19 9:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Everyone calls it "libxml2" nowadays. Let's just use that and avoid any
> possible confusion. If some libxml3 emerges one day, it's quite likely
> we'll need to revise much more than our docs in order to use it.
That's persuasive to me. I'll change the
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> I suppose that if you're a Postgres developer, you naturally expect that
> "createdb" creates a Postgres DB. What if you use multiple database
> systems, and then only occasionally have to do DBA tasks? I find this
> POV that createdb doesn't need renaming a bit self-cen
On 27/03/2019 15:26, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:07:24PM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>> On 3/27/19 2:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
>>> that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands wi
On 27/03/2019 11:51, Andrey Borodin wrote:
Hi!
Here's new version of GiST amcheck, which takes into account recently committed
GiST VACUUM.
It tests that deleted pages do not contain any data.
Thanks! I had a look, and refactored it quite a bit.
I found the way the recursion worked confusing
Symlinks would be great, because then the symlinks could be packaged
as an optional package.
such as;
- postgresql-11
- postgresql-client-11
- postgresql-client-symlinks-11
- postgresql-client-common
- postgresql-common
Then one might chose to not install the symlinks package or uninstall it.
And
On 26.03.2019 11:19, Michael Paquier wrote:
+ * This is a simplified and adapted to frontend version of
+ * RestoreArchivedFile function from transam/xlogarchive.c
+ */
+static int
+RestoreArchivedWAL(const char *path, const char *xlogfname,
I don't think that we should have duplicates for that,
On 2019-Mar-27, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > I suppose that if you're a Postgres developer, you naturally expect that
> > "createdb" creates a Postgres DB. What if you use multiple database
> > systems, and then only occasionally have to do DBA tasks? I find this
> > POV that cr
Hi Pascal,
Thanks for your feedback! I like your ideas.
>the part that hurts in terms or performances is:
>
> if (jstate.clocations_count > 0)
> pgss_store(pstate->p_sourcetext,
I agree that this is the typically the most expensive part, but query
normalization and hashing c
> Setting compress_tuple_target to a higher value won't be negative because the
> toast_tuple_target is used for compression anyways when compress_tuple_target
> is higher than toast_tuple_target.
Ack, you're right. Got my wires crossed. I must have gotten confused by my later
tests that enforced
Hi,
I've now committed the MCV part, after addressing the last two issues
raised by Dean:
* The MCV build now always uses the mincount to decide which of the
items to keep in the list.
* Both the MCV build and deserialization now uses the same maximum number
of list items (10k).
Unfortunately,
On 27/03/2019 20:55, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've now committed the MCV part, after addressing the last two issues
> raised by Dean:
>
Congrats!
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Your fix is probably the best one.
Maybe this could be considered as a bug and back ported to previous versions
...
Regards
PAscal
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
I still think that the speed should compute a double to avoid integer
rounding errors within the computation. ISTM that rounding should only be
done for display in the end.
Ok, also done this way. I decided to print only full MB and not any
further digits as those don't seem very relevant.
>> - trailing whitespaces and comments wider than 80 characters
>> not fixed
> why? In case it's not clear, I'm talking about the .c file, not the
> regression tests.
I work on a poor msys install on windows 7, where perl is broken ;o(
So no pgindent available.
Will fix that later,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 15:57 Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: To Tom Lane 2019-03-26 <20190326151446.gg3...@msg.df7cb.de>
> > I run a benchmark with checksums disabled/enabled. shared_buffers is
> > 512kB to make sure almost any read will fetch the page from the OS
> > cache; scale factor is 50 (~750MB
Hi hackers,
Attached is sketch of small patch that fixes several edge cases with
autovacuum. Long story short autovacuum never comes to append only tables,
killing large productions.
First case, mine.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAC8Q8tLBeAxR%2BBXWuKK%2BHP5m8tEVYn270CVrDvKXt%3D0PkJTY9g
On 28/03/2019 03:07, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
On 3/27/19 2:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with
the
pg_ prefix, and it's a completely different thing to rename exis
On 28/03/2019 03:41, Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas Karlsson writes:
On 3/27/19 3:26 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
That is true, of course. But are there actual examples of such conflicts
in practice? I mean, are there tools/packages that provide commands with
a conflicting name? I'm not aware of any, and
On 2019-03-27 18:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> My recollection of the discussion is that people argued that "postmaster"
> might be taken to have something to do with an e-mail server, and
> therefore we needed to stop using that name. The lack of either follow-on
> complaints or follow-on action doesn't
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:36 PM legrand legrand
wrote:
>
> >> - trailing whitespaces and comments wider than 80 characters
> >> not fixed
>
> > why? In case it's not clear, I'm talking about the .c file, not the
> > regression tests.
>
> I work on a poor msys install on windows 7, wh
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:35 PM Tsunakawa, Takayuki
wrote:
> I almost have the same view as Sawada-san. The reloption
> vacuum_shrink_enabled is a positive name and follows the naming style of
> other reloptions. I hope this matches the style you have in mind.
You're both right and I'm wrong
On 2019-03-26 16:28, Euler Taveira wrote:
> I don't remember why we didn't consider table without stats to be
> ANALYZEd. Isn't it the case to fix autovacuum? Analyze
> autovacuum_count + vacuum_count = 0?
When the autovacuum system was introduced, we didn't have those columns.
But now it seems t
On 2019-Mar-27, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
> Attached is sketch of small patch that fixes several edge cases with
> autovacuum. Long story short autovacuum never comes to append only tables,
> killing large productions.
Yeah, autovac is not coping with these scenarios (and probably oth
On 2019-Mar-27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-03-26 16:28, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > I don't remember why we didn't consider table without stats to be
> > ANALYZEd. Isn't it the case to fix autovacuum? Analyze
> > autovacuum_count + vacuum_count = 0?
>
> When the autovacuum system was introduc
Hi,
чт, 28 мар. 2019 г. в 00:32, Alvaro Herrera :
> On 2019-Mar-27, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
>
> > Attached is sketch of small patch that fixes several edge cases with
> > autovacuum. Long story short autovacuum never comes to append only
> tables,
> > killing large productions.
>
>
On 2019-Mar-28, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
> чт, 28 мар. 2019 г. в 00:32, Alvaro Herrera :
>
> > On 2019-Mar-27, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
> > * certain tables would have some sort of partial scan that sets the
> > visibility map. There's no reason to invoke the whole
Hi Fabien,
Thank you for your time. Apologies for not being more specific about my testing
methodology.
> > PGSS not loaded: 0.18ms
>
> This means 0.0018 ms latency per transaction, which seems rather fast, on my
> laptop I have typically 0.0XX ms...
This actually means 0.18 milliseconds. I ag
my test case:
drop table a;
create table a ();
DO
$$
DECLARE
i int;
BEGIN
for i in 1..20
loop
execute 'alter table a add column a'||i::text||' int';
end loop;
END
$$;
select pg_stat_statements_reset();
set pg_stat_statements.track='none';
DO
$$
DECLARE
i int;
j int;
BEGIN
for j in 1..20
loop
f
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 19:48, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Sorry if this was discussed before, but why does this patch add any new
> code to partprune.c? AFAICT, there's no functionality changes to the
> pruning code.
You're right. It probably shouldn't be there. There's a bit of a lack
of a good home
Julien Rouhaud wrote
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:36 PM legrand legrand
> <
> legrand_legrand@
> > wrote:
>>
>> >> - trailing whitespaces and comments wider than 80 characters
>> >> not fixed
>>
>> > why? In case it's not clear, I'm talking about the .c file, not the
>> > regression
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:24, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Noticed a typo.
>
> + * multiple subpaths then we can't make guarantees about the
> + * order tuples in those subpaths, so we must leave the
>
> order of tuples?
I'll fix that. Thanks.
> Again, sorry if this was
Hi,
xml-functions-type-docfix-5.patch attached, with node-sets instead of
nodesets, libxml2 instead of libxml, and parenthesized full sentences
now au naturel.
I ended up turning the formerly-parenthesized note about libxml2's
node-set ordering into a DocBook : there is really something
parenthet
On 03/27/19 19:07, Chapman Flack wrote:
> xml-functions-type-docfix-5.patch attached, with node-sets instead of
> nodesets, libxml2 instead of libxml, and parenthesized full sentences
> now au naturel.
>
> I ended up turning the formerly-parenthesized note about libxml2's
> node-set ordering into
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 11:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2019-Mar-28, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
> > "Nearing wraparound" is too late already. In Amazon, reading table from gp2
> > after you exhausted your IOPS burst budget is like reading a floppy drive,
> > you have to freeze a lot
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 10:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2019-Mar-27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > On 2019-03-26 16:28, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > > I don't remember why we didn't consider table without stats to be
> > > ANALYZEd. Isn't it the case to fix autovacuum? Analyze
> > > autovacuum_coun
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:29 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Thanks! I had a look, and refactored it quite a bit.
I'm really happy that other people seem to be driving amcheck in a new
direction, without any prompting from me. It's too important to remain
something that only I have contributed to
Hello, Fabien-san.
> From: Fabien COELHO
> About the backend v11 patch.
> No space or newline before ";". Same comment about the libpq_ timeout.
Fixed.
> There is an error in the code, I think it should be < 0 to detect errors.
Yes, thanks!
> If the parameter has no effect on Windows, I do not
Hi,
On 2019/03/28 7:29, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 19:48, Amit Langote
> wrote:
>> Sorry if this was discussed before, but why does this patch add any new
>> code to partprune.c? AFAICT, there's no functionality changes to the
>> pruning code.
>
> You're right. It probably sho
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:28 AM Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2019-03-25 22:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> > + fprintf(script, "echo %sYou may wish to add --jobs=N for parallel
> analyzing.%s\n",
> > + ECHO_QUOTE, ECHO_QUOTE);
>
> But then you get
Thank you for updating the patch!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:28 PM Adrien NAYRAT
wrote:
>
> On 3/27/19 10:22 AM, Adrien NAYRAT wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 3/27/19 7:05 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Why are both of these checked? ISTM once xact_is_sampled is set, we
> > ought not to resp
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 14:34, Amit Langote
wrote:
>
> On 2019/03/28 7:29, David Rowley wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 19:48, Amit Langote
> > It does need to know how many partitions the partitioned table has,
> > which it gets from partrel->nparts, so yeah, RelOptInfo is probably
> > needed. I
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
> You're both right and I'm wrong.
>
> However, I think it would be better to stick with the term 'truncate'
> which is widely-used already, rather than introducing a new term.
Yeah, I have the same feeling. OTOH, as I referred in this thread, shr
On 3/27/19 9:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov writes:
>> Still no reproduction.
> Annoying, but it's probably not worth expending more effort on
> right now. I wonder whether that buildfarm animal can be upgraded
> to capture core dump stack traces --- if so, then if it happens
> agai
Hello, Fabien-san.
> From: Fabien COELHO [mailto:coe...@cri.ensmp.fr]
> The default postgres configuration file should be updated to reflect the
> parameter and its default value.
I'm very sorry for not addressing your review in the last patch.
I modified TCP_backend patch (adding postgresql.conf.
Hi,
On 2019/03/27 8:27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Mar-26, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the thorough testing and bug analysis! It was spot-on. I've
>> applied your two proposed fixes, as well as added a new test setup that
>> covers both these bugs. The attached set is rebased on
Hello.
At Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:11:23 +, "Nagaura, Ryohei"
wrote in
> Hello, Fabien-san.
>
> > From: Fabien COELHO
> > About the backend v11 patch.
> > No space or newline before ";". Same comment about the libpq_ timeout.
> Fixed.
>
> > There is an error in the code, I think it should be
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 15:40, David Rowley wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I've attached a patch that mostly just moved
> the code around.
Here's one that fixes up the compiler warning from the last one.
Thanks CF bot...
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQ
On 2019/03/27 23:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Rowley writes:
>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 18:39, Amit Langote
>> wrote:
>>> On 2019/03/27 14:26, David Rowley wrote:
Perhaps the way to make this work, at least in the long term is to do
in the planner what we did in the executor in d73f4c74dd
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> I was able to get this stack trace.
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x7ffb9ce6a458 in ntdll!RtlRaiseStatus ()
>from C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll
> #1 0x7ffb9ce7760e in ntdll!memset () from C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll
> #2 0x7ffb9ac52e1a in msvcrt!_setjmpex ()
>
Amit Langote writes:
> On 2019/03/27 23:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, there's something to be said for having plancat.c open each table
>> *and store the Relation pointer in the RelOptInfo*, and then close that
>> again at the end of planning rather than immediately. If we can't avoid
>> these ret
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:48 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Once we have the FullTransactionId type and basic macros in place, I'm
> sure we could tidy up a bunch of code by using them. For example,
> TransactionIdInRecentPast() in walsender.c would be simpler, if the
> caller dealt with FullTrans
чт, 28 мар. 2019 г. в 01:01, Alvaro Herrera :
> On 2019-Mar-28, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
>
>
> > чт, 28 мар. 2019 г. в 00:32, Alvaro Herrera :
> >
> > > On 2019-Mar-27, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
>
> > > * certain tables would have some sort of partial scan that sets the
>
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI [mailto:horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> +if (setsockopt(conn->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT,
> + (char *) &timeout, sizeof(timeout)) < 0 && errno !=
> ENOPROTOOPT)
> +{
> +charsebuf[256];
> +
> +appendPQExpBuffer(&conn->er
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
