On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 11:55:48AM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:49 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > This has initdb set the field to the current C implementation's signedness.
> > I
> > wonder if, instead, initdb should set signedness=true unco
Rebased.
Author: Noah Misch
Commit: Noah Misch
For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations.
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK. The inval didn't, so another
backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the
inplace update. I
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> We also discussed the topic at
> https://postgr.es/m/20240925020022.c5.nmisch%40google.com
> > ... neither BM_SETTING_HINTS nor keeping bounce buffers looks like a bad
> > decision. From what I've heard so far of the performance eff
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:46:27PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 6:46 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 09:43:41PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 9:24 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Se
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:52:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Currently, if you configure a hot standby server with a smaller
> max_connections setting than the primary, the server refuses to start up:
>
> LOG: entering standby mode
> FATAL: recovery aborted because of insufficient param
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:30:25PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2024-09-24 12:43:40 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 11:55:08AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Besides that, the need to copy the buffers makes checkpoints with AIO
> > > noticeabl
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:33:46PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:55:32AM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 12:25 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/49/5090/ remains in status="Needs
> > > revi
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:14:11PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 03:47:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Oh! After nosing around a bit more I remembered systable_recheck_tuple,
> > which is meant for exactly this purpose. So v4 attached.
>
> systable_rec
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 11:55:08AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> So far the AIO patchset has solved this by introducing a set of "bounce
> buffers", which can be acquired and used as the source/target of IO when doing
> it in-place into shared buffers isn't viable.
>
> I am worried about that solu
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 09:25:05AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 3:27 AM Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-09-18 at 02:58 +0000, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > Don't enter parallel mode when holding interrupts.
> > >
> > > Doing s
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 09:43:41PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 9:24 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:42:48PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:05 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 10,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 01:51:42PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2024-09-16 07:43:49 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:38:16PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Reattaching descriptors and memory in each child may work, or one could just
> > block io_
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:42:48PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:05 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:56:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Got it. So now I'm wondering if we need all the complexity of storing
> > > st
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:38:16PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> There's plenty more to do, but I thought this would be a useful checkpoint.
I find patches 1-5 are Ready for Committer.
> +typedef enum PgAioHandleState
This enum clarified a lot for me, so I wish I had read it before anything
else
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 09:00:33AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 4:58 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > ... a rule of "each wait event appears in one
> > pgstat_report_wait_start()" would be a rule I don't want.
>
> As the original committer of
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 09:19:09AM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 01:38, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I also fixed the mix of tabs and spaces inside test file string literals.
>
> I ran both pgindent and pgperltidy but they didn't catch them. Is
> th
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 09:20:21PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> 2. If a Windows client tries to send() and gets an ECONNRESET/EPIPE
> error, then the network stack seems to drop already received data, so
> a following recv() will never see it. In other words, it depends on
> whether the applicati
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 02:35:46PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Your patch is correct. I wrongly assumed it would catch blockno bug,
> the attached version catches it. I made blockno = 0 invisible and not
> frozen before copying the vm file. So, in the blockno buggy version;
> callback will sk
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:56:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Masahiko Sawada writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:57 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yeah, that seems like it could work. But are we sure that replicas
> >> get a copy of the primary's control file rather than creating their
> >> own?
>
>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 02:51:23PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 1:27 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 02:29:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > You are adding twelve event points with only 5
> > > new wait names. Couldn'
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 02:29:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You are adding twelve event points with only 5
> new wait names. Couldn't it be better to have a one-one mapping
> instead, adding twelve entries in wait_event_names.txt?
No, I think the patch's level of detail is better. One sho
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:25:07PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 18:54, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:59:53PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Sept 2024 at 21:43, Noah Misch wrote:
> >
On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 06:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> 07.09.2024 21:11, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > Noah, what do you think of handling this error in line with handling of
> > > ERROR_BROKEN_PIPE and ERROR_BAD_PIPE (which was done in 0ea1f2a3a)?
> > >
>
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 03:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> With extra logging added, I got:
> ### Stopping node "CIC_2PC_test" using mode fast
> # Running: pg_ctl -D
> C:\src\postgresql\build/testrun/amcheck_3/003_cic_2pc\data/t_003_cic_2pc_CIC_2PC_test_data/pgdata
> -m fast stop
> waitin
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 07:37:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:36:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I feel like all of these are leaning heavily on users to get it right,
>
> > What do you have in mind? I see things for th
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:36:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > Yes, that's one way to make it work. If we do it that way, it would be
> > critical to make the ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE run before anything uses the
> > index. Otherwise, we'll run
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 02:07:10PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 8:10 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 03:48:53PM -0500, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 6:46 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > If I were stand
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:22:48PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> Thanks. I have no other comments.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/49/5090/ remains in status="Needs review".
When someone moves it to status="Ready for Committer", I will commit
inplace090, inplace110, and inplace120 patches. If o
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 07:10:04PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 1:27 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 09:00:32PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> > > Assert(rel->ri_needsLockTagTuple ==
> > > IsInplaceUpdateRelation(rel->r
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:59:53PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sept 2024 at 21:43, Noah Misch wrote:
> > https://postgr.es/m/caeudqaozv3wty5tv2t29jcwpydbmkbiwqkzd42s2ogzdixp...@mail.gmail.com
> > then observed that collect_corrupt_items() was now guaranteed to ne
precheck design qualifying as a modularity
improvement.
> Assert(rel->ri_needsLockTagTuple ==
> IsInplaceUpdateRelation(rel->relationDesc)
>
> This can safeguard against users of ResultRelInfo missing this field.
v10 does the rename and adds that assertion. This question remains o
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:58:33AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> In general emitting a LOG inside a critical section isn't a huge issue - we
> made sure that elog.c has a reserve of memory to be able to log without
> crashing.
>
> However, the current message for buffer IO issues use relpath*() (e
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:46:34PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 22:20, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:50:11AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > Pushed with some other cosmetic changes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I see I pushed
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:24:52PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 6:40 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:08:43PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:11 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > -
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:50:11AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 03:20:12PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > Thanks, updated patches are attached.
>
> > +/*
> > + * Ask the callback which block it would like us to read next, with a small
> >
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 03:20:12PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Thanks, updated patches are attached.
> +/*
> + * Ask the callback which block it would like us to read next, with a small
> + * buffer in front to allow read_stream_unget_block() to work and to allow
> the
> + * fast path to sk
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 03:48:53PM -0500, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 6:46 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > If I were standardizing pg_trgm on one or the other notion of "char", I
> > would
> > choose signed char, since I think it's still the majo
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:08:43PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:11 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 11:59:45AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > > My order of preference is: 2, 1, 3.
> >
> > I kept tuple locking respo
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:23:49AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:57:30PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2024-06-17 16:58:54 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 03:37:18PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 22,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:49:19AM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 at 22:01, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:20:06PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 21:47, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Au
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:20:06PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 21:47, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 03:22:27PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > > The downside of this approach is there are too many "vmbuffer is valid
> &g
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 11:59:45AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 17/08/2024 07:07, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:26:28PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > > I wonder if the functions should be called "systable_*" and placed in
> >
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 03:22:27PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> 2- collect_corrupt_items()
>
> This one is more complicated. The read stream callback function loops
> until it finds a suitable block to read. So, if the callback returns
> an InvalidBlockNumber; it means that the stream process
Thanks for reviewing.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:26:28PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 14/07/2024 20:48, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I've pushed the two patches for your reports. To placate cfbot, I'm
> > attaching
> > the remaining patches.
>
> inp
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 07:24:33AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I've just applied now the remaining pieces down to 17.
Comparing commit c9e2457 to the patch in zqgvzsbw5tgkq...@paquier.xyz, the
commit lacks the slru.c portion.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 08:46:35AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> When systable_beginscan() and systable_beginscan_ordered() choose an index
> scan, they remap the attribute numbers in the passed-in scan keys to the
> attribute numbers of the index, and then write those remapped attribute
> numbe
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:22:51AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I've pushed 0001 and 0002
The partition MERGE (1adf16b8f) and SPLIT (87c21bb94) v17 patches introduced
createPartitionTable() with this code:
createStmt->relation = newPartName;
...
wrapper->utilityStmt = (Node
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:23:49AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:57:30PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2024-06-17 16:58:54 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > That inplace150 patch turned out to be unnecessary. Contrary to the
> > > "noncrit
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 01:32:18PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> > > [*] What is the correct name for this?
> >
> > I believe in this section it should be "Visual Studio" as we specify
> > elsewhere [1][2]. In [2] we name specific required versions. Maybe we
> > should reference this section.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 02:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> ---
> /home/nm/farm/gcc64/REL_14_STABLE/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/expected/stats.out
> 2022-03-30 01:18:17.0 +
> +++
> /home/nm/farm/gcc64/REL_14_STABLE/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/results/stats.out
> 2024-07-30
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 03:44:48PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:43 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 05:29:12PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:46 PM Thomas Munro
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:50:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> >> A recent buildfarm test failure [1] showed that the
> >> intra-grant-inplace-db.spec test added with 0844b3968 may f
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 08:19:13AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:03:26PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > vote one way or the other on the question in
> > https://postgr.es/m/20240706195129...@rfd.leadboat.com?
>
> I'll keep the voting open for anot
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:52:13AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 06:00:59AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I'm still seeing need for s/int/int64/ at:
> I am attaching a patch for all these you have spotted, switching the
> logs to use %llx. Does th
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:03:26PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:48:46AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-07-11 at 05:50 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > This is still marked as an open item for 17, but you've already
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 06:01:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hearing nothing but cicadas as now is their season, I have taken the
> initiative here to address this open item.
>
> 0001 felt a bit too complicated in slru.h, so I have simplified it and
> kept all the details in slru.c with Slru
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 01:07:49PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 07:39 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Short-term, we should remedy the step backward that pg_c_utf8 has taken:
> > https://postgr.es/m/20240718233908.52.nmi...@google.com
> >
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 09:34:42AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 11:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:26 AM Peter Eisentraut
> > wrote:
> > > I disagree with that. We should put ourselves into the position to
> > > adopt new Unicode versions without f
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 12:00:45PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 21:14, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On a different naming topic, my review missed that field name
> > copy_storage_using_buffer_read_stream_private.last_block doesn't fit how the
> > fi
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:01:31PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 14:27, Noah Misch wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 02:11:13PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > > v4 is attached.
> >
> > Removal of the PinBufferForBl
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> 28.06.2024 08:13, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Pushed.
>
> A recent buildfarm test failure [1] showed that the
> intra-grant-inplace-db.spec test added with 0844b3968 may fail
> on a slow machine
> But as the t
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 02:11:13PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> v4 is attached.
Removal of the PinBufferForBlock() comment about the "persistence =
RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT" fallback started to feel like a loss. I looked for
a way to re-add a comment about the fallback.
https://coverage.post
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 01:03:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This whole discussion seems quite bizarre to me. In the first
> place, it is certain that Unicode will continue to evolve, and
> I can't believe that we'd just freeze pg_c_utf8 on the current
> definition forever. Whether the first chang
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:05:34AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-07-17 at 15:03 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > If I'm counting the votes right, you and Tom have voted that the feature's
> > current state is okay, and I and Laurenz have voted that it's not ok
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:48:46AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-07-11 at 05:50 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > This is still marked as an open item for 17, but you've already
> > > acknowledged[1] that no code changes are necessary in version 17.
> >
&g
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 12:22:49PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 15:19, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 02:11:20PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 02:52, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Ap
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 02:11:20PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 02:52, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:12:19PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > > --- a/src/backend/storage/aio/read_stream.c
> > > +++ b/src/backen
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 03:26:32PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 2:49 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > what is the scope of the review you seek?
>
> The patch "Refactor tidstore.c memory management." could definitely
> use some review.
That's reaso
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 03:08:16PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> > 28.06.2024 08:13, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > Pushed. ...
> >
> > Please look also at another anomaly, I've discovered.
> >
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 04:50:17PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-07-12 at 16:11 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Since refresh->relation is a RangeVar, this departs from the standard
> > against
> > repeated name lookups, from CVE-2014-0062 (commit 5f17304).
>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:50:52PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-07-11 at 05:52 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > I could try to refactor it into two statements and execute them
> > > separately, or I could try to rewrite the statement to use a fully-
> > &g
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 05:29:12PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:46 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> > The specific problem here is that LocalProcessControlFile() runs in
> > every launched child for EXEC_BACKEND builds. Windows uses
> > EXEC_BACKEND, and Windows' NTFS file syste
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:12:19PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> I am working on using read streams in the CREATE DATABASE command when the
> strategy is wal_log. RelationCopyStorageUsingBuffer() function is used in
> this context. This function reads source buffers then copies them to the
Ple
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 05:47:36PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 15:20 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 03:23:44PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Hmm. Is RestrictSearchPath() something that we should advertise more
> > strongly
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:20:12PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-07-08 at 18:05 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I'm thinking about these
> > aggravating factors for $SUBJECT:
>
> This is still marked as an open item for 17, but you've already
> acknow
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 04:19:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > As a released feature, NORMALIZE() has a different set of remedies to choose
> > from, and I'm not proposing one. I may have sidetracked this thread by
> > talking about remedies
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 04:39:21PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-06-30 at 15:30 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > You're caching the result of object_aclcheck(NamespaceRelationId,
> > ...), so
> > pg_auth_members changes
>
> Thank you for the report.
>
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 02:09:21PM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:48 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > That said, it
> > may be more fruitful to arrange for authentication timeout to cut through
> > PAM
> > etc.
>
> That seems mostly out of our
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 05:36:25PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I've attached a WIP v11 streaming vacuum patch set here that is
> rebased over master (by Thomas), so that I could add a CF entry for
> it. It still has the problem with the extra WAL write and fsync calls
> investigated by Thomas
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:51:52PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Here's a rebase. I decided against committing this for v17 in the
> end. There's not much wrong with it AFAIK, except perhaps an
> unprincipled chopping up of writes with large io_combine_limit due to
> simplistic flow control, and I
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:38:45PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 14:26 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I think you're saying that if some Unicode update changes the results
> > of a
> > STABLE function but does not change the result of any IMMUTABLE
> &
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> 28.06.2024 08:13, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Pushed. ...
>
> Please look also at another anomaly, I've discovered.
>
> An Assert added with d5f788b41 may be falsified with:
> CREATE TABLE t(a int PRIMARY
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 02:19:07PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> * Unless I made a mistake, the last three releases of Unicode (14.0,
> 15.0, and 15.1) all have the exact same behavior for UPPER() and
> LOWER() -- even for unassigned code points. It would be silly to
> promise to stay with 15.1 and th
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> > 29.06.2024 05:42, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > Good point, any effort on (2) would be wasted once the fixes get
> > > certified. I
> >
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> 29.06.2024 05:42, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Good point, any effort on (2) would be wasted once the fixes get certified.
> > I
> > pushed (1). I'm attaching the rebased fix patches.
>
> Please look
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 05:19:47PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:42 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Thomas Munro writes:
> > > In CommitTransaction() there is a stretch of code beginning s->state =
> > > TRANS_COMMIT and ending s->state = TRANS_DEFAULT, from which we call
> > > o
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:42:50PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 02/07/2024 02:24, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 12:53:05AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> log_newpage_range() loads the pages to the buffer
> cache and dirties them. That kinds of sucks a
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 12:05:09AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 02.07.24 18:51, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 06:19:08PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 16:03 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > An alternative woul
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 12:31:48AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 2:18 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > Commit e85662d wrote:
> > > --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
> > > +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
&
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 06:19:08PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 16:03 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > An alternative would be to make pg_upgrade reject
> > operating on a cluster that contains use of $SUBJECT.
>
> That wouldn't help anyone.
Can you
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 12:53:05AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 01/07/2024 23:52, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Commit 8af2565 wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/src/backend/storage/smgr/bulk_write.c
> >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Finish bulk wri
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 12:24:15PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 15:08 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > lower(), initcap(), upper(), and regexp_matches() are
> > PROVOLATILE_IMMUTABLE.
> > Until now, we've delegated that responsibility to the user. The u
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:27:34PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Committed this. Thanks everyone!
Commit 8af2565 wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/backend/storage/smgr/bulk_write.c
> +/*
> + * Finish bulk write operation.
> + *
> + * This WAL-logs and flushes any remaining pending writes to
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:32:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 05:01:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm tempted to lobotomize the new test case on Windows until
> >> we have that resolved.
>
> > Sounds fin
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 02:10:59PM +0200, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I'm going to push this if no objections.
Commit e85662d wrote:
> --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
> +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
> @@ -2740,6 +2741,8 @@ GetRunningTransactionData(void)
>*/
>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:13:25PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 19:01 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > 0003: Cache for recomputeNamespacePath.
>
> Committed
Commit f26c236 wrote:
> Add cache for recomputeNamespacePath().
>
> When search_path is changed to something th
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:52:05PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Committed.
Commit 2af07e2 wrote:
> --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c
> @@ -1412,6 +1412,8 @@ brin_summarize_range(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> SetUserIdAndSecContext(heapRel->rd_rel->relown
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 05:01:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 02:58:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So b3f5ccebd promptly blew up on fairywren [1]:
>
> > It does look consistent with IPC::Run predating v20220807.0, hence
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 02:58:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > In hopes of moving things along as we approach the v18 branch,
> > I went ahead and pushed Kuroda-san's patches (with a bit of
> > further editorialization).
>
> So b3f5ccebd promptly blew up on fairywren [1]:
>
> connection
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 05:50:48PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-Mar-12, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 10:19, Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote:
> > > Here's a last one for the cfbot.
> >
> > Thanks for committing the first 3 patches btw.
>
> Thanks, I included it.
PGcanc
1 - 100 of 1012 matches
Mail list logo
