Hi,
When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments different?"
from audience. That difference looks confusing for users and
IMO it&#
At Tue, 30 Jun 2020 23:51:40 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
> Hi,
>
> When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
> at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
> setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
On 2020-Jun-30, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
> at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
> setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments different?"
> fr
On 2020/07/01 12:26, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2020-Jun-30, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments diff
e the units of
> > > setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments different?"
> > > from audience. That difference looks confusing for users and
> > > IMO it's better to use the same unit for them. Thought?
> >
> > Do we still need wal
ts of
setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments different?"
from audience. That difference looks confusing for users and
IMO it's better to use the same unit for them. Thought?
Do we still need wal_keep_segments for anything?
Yeah, personally I like wal_keep_segme
t; > > >
> > > > > When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
> > > > > at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
> > > > > setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
> > > >
On 2020-Jul-01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We have the following wal*size GUC settings:
>
> SELECT name FROM pg_settings WHERE name LIKE '%wal%size%';
> name
>
>max_slot_wal_keep_size
>max_wal_size
>min_wal_size
>wal
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 04:25:35PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Jul-01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > We have the following wal*size GUC settings:
> >
> > SELECT name FROM pg_settings WHERE name LIKE '%wal%size%';
> > name
> >
> > max_slo
>> When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
> >>>> at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
> >>>> setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
> >>>> different?"
received the question like "Why are the units of
setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments different?"
from audience. That difference looks confusing for users and
IMO it's better to use the same unit for them. Thought?
Do we still need wal_keep_segments for a
On 2020-Jul-09, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I attached the patch that renames wal_keep_segments to wal_keep_size.
Looks good in a quick once-over. Just two small wording comments:
>
> Independently of max_wal_size,
> -+ 1 most recent WAL files are
> + most recent megabytes
> + WAL fil
ote:
> >>>> On 2020-Jun-30, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
> >>>>> at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
> >>>>> setting
On 2020/07/09 1:20, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2020-Jul-09, Fujii Masao wrote:
I attached the patch that renames wal_keep_segments to wal_keep_size.
Looks good in a quick once-over. Just two small wording comments:
Thanks for review comments!
Independently of max_wal_size,
-
Masao wrote:
When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
different?"
from audience. That difference looks confusing for users an
>>>>>>> When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13
> >>>>>>> at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of
> >>>>>>> setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segmen
_size and wal_keep_segments
different?"
from audience. That difference looks confusing for users and
IMO it's better to use the same unit for them. Thought?
Do we still need wal_keep_segments for anything?
Yeah, personally I like wal_keep_segments because its setting is very
simp
On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
The patch was no longer applied cleanly because of recent commit.
So I updated the patch. Attached.
Barring any objection, I will commit this patch.
This doesn't look right:
+ the most recent megabytes
+ WAL files plus one WAL file are
How about:
On 2020/07/14 20:30, David Steele wrote:
On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
The patch was no longer applied cleanly because of recent commit.
So I updated the patch. Attached.
Barring any objection, I will commit this patch.
This doesn't look right:
+ the most recent megabytes
+
On 7/17/20 5:11 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/14 20:30, David Steele wrote:
On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
The patch was no longer applied cleanly because of recent commit.
So I updated the patch. Attached.
Barring any objection, I will commit this patch.
This doesn't look
On 2020/07/17 20:24, David Steele wrote:
On 7/17/20 5:11 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/14 20:30, David Steele wrote:
On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
The patch was no longer applied cleanly because of recent commit.
So I updated the patch. Attached.
Barring any objection, I
On 2020/07/20 13:48, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/17 20:24, David Steele wrote:
On 7/17/20 5:11 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/14 20:30, David Steele wrote:
On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
The patch was no longer applied cleanly because of recent commit.
So I updated the p
On 7/20/20 6:02 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/20 13:48, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/17 20:24, David Steele wrote:
On 7/17/20 5:11 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/14 20:30, David Steele wrote:
On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
The patch was no longer applied cleanly beca
On 2020/07/20 21:21, David Steele wrote:
On 7/20/20 6:02 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/20 13:48, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/17 20:24, David Steele wrote:
On 7/17/20 5:11 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/07/14 20:30, David Steele wrote:
On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
24 matches
Mail list logo
