Dear Tom,
Due to how ACL are defined in SQL, I restate my suggestion that the super
user should be able to change ANY right, including the GRANTOR field,
I'm unconvinced of this: that philosophy soon leads you into allowing
the superuser to create self-inconsistent sets of rights, such as
I tried running 'make installcheck' in contrib just now, and didn't
get past btree_gist :-(
Fix and test on Alpha box.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your
I was just looking at this macro:
/*
* PageGetMaxOffsetNumber
*Returns the maximum offset number used by the given page.
*Since offset numbers are 1-based, this is also the number
*of items on the page.
*
*NOTE: to ensure sane behavior if the page is not
Teodor Sigaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried running 'make installcheck' in contrib just now, and didn't
get past btree_gist :-(
Fix and test on Alpha box.
Works for me on HPPA now, too. Thanks.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Hi Tom,
Are the zic files something that should be updated for every minor
release, or only for every major release?
AFAIK they don't change very often.
I'm not sure. In Brazil, we change it every year 'cause we have 'summer
time'. See src/timezone/data/southamerica
I think we can
Euler Taveira de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are the zic files something that should be updated for every minor
release, or only for every major release?
AFAIK they don't change very often.
I'm not sure. In Brazil, we change it every year 'cause we have 'summer
time'. See
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The difficulty with acquiring lock earlier is that to acquire lock,
you need to know the relation's shared/unshared status as well as
its OID. We'd need to do something with all the code that assumes
that an OID is sufficient information for opening
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:57:05AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
No, I said own xid --- so the phantom xid part is still there. But
your idea definitely does *not* work unless you use a single CID
sequence for the whole main xact; and I'm still wondering if there's
not a
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:40:00AM -, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
Fabrizio Mazzoni asked:
How can i find out if a prepared statement already exists..? Is there a
function or a query i can execute ..??
I have not seen an answer to this, and I am curious as well. Anyone?
Trying to
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:57:05AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
No, I said own xid --- so the phantom xid part is still there. But
your idea definitely does *not* work unless you use a single CID
sequence for the whole main xact; and I'm still
Hi all,
I'm in the process of writing an OLE DB provider for postgres. I am,
right now, at the point where updating an entry becomes an issue.
Ideally, I would open an updateable cursor for a table/view, and use
that. Unfortunetly, Postgres doesn't seem to support those at all.
As an
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Without checking into details, this sounds like it could be a broken
ming/msys installation. Are you on the latest release version?
Also, check for the Makefile.port file manually. configure cleraly
thinks it has created it... If it's not there, check if you can
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
I was looking at that last night. It seems like we could add a LIMIT at
--On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 13:56:14 -0500 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
The question is whether we should have a GUC variable to control no
waiting on locks or add NO WAIT to specific SQL commands.
Does anyone want to vote _against_ the GUC idea for nowait
I agree with Tom here. I have used the Oracle NOWAIT feature in the
past and think it is a great feature IMHO. But when you need to use it,
you want it to apply very specifically to a single statement. Using a
sledge hammer when you need a tweezers isn't the right way to go.
Once I have
Seeing how PITR, nested transactions, and other exciting developments
related to transactions are being developed, I am getting curious about how
PostgreSQL actually implements transactions. Investigating Materialized
Views has led me to look closely at how transactions work and such.
Do you
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 05:38:21PM -0700, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
Do you know of good resources on learning how transactions are implemented
in PostgreSQL? Should I just peruse the code? Which files are most
relevant?
backend/access/transam/xact.c (high level transaction status) and
Parsing is a whole nother ball of wax besides lexing. I wasn't planning
to put *that* into psql. Remember the only thing psql really wants from
this is to detect where end-of-statement is ...
OK, I'm not that great at understanding where lexing ands and parsing
starts. These are the things
Doh, sorry. I just realised that the lists just gave me a whole bunch
of mails from back in February, which is when Tom made this post...
Chris
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Parsing is a whole nother ball of wax besides lexing. I wasn't planning
to put *that* into psql. Remember the only
Yes, Slonik's,
it't true. After nearly a year the Slony-I project is entering the BETA
phase for the 1.0 release. Please visit
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony1/news/newsfull.php?news_id=174
for further details.
Jan Wieck
--
Hello,
Going through the regress test sql files I noticed that when testing
string functions there was no upper / lower case tests.
I see upper / lower being used in the select_having and select_implicit
files in the GROUP BY and ORDER BY clauses.
Good enough or should I submit patch for adding
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would adding OID to the rows returned by each Select call, and then doing
update blah where oid=xxx when I'm requested to update the row sound like a
reasonable stategy, in lieu of updateable cursors? Can anyone suggest a better
way?
If you're in
22 matches
Mail list logo
