[HACKERS] Information Required

2005-01-09 Thread imad
Can anyone please tell me where in the source code, I can find the compelte query. -- Regards Imad ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > >> My feeling is that the *.txt is actually misleading because > > >people will > > >> think of it as a file full of freeform text (paragraphs) and not a > > >> configuration file. > > > > > >Why would they think that? If notepad tends to auto-wra

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > [.][..] 1138945.s 1138945.w > abook.mab bookmarks-1.html bookmarks-2.html > bookmarks-3.html > bookmarks-4.html bookmarks-5.html bookmarks-6.html bookmarks.html > [Cache][Cache.Tras

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> My feeling is that the *.txt is actually misleading because > >people will > >> think of it as a file full of freeform text (paragraphs) and not a > >> configuration file. > > > >Why would they think that? If notepad tends to auto-wrap files then > >this argument has s

[HACKERS] PG 8.0: the launch clock is running

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Lane
Current plans are to wrap the PG 8.0 final tarball Monday evening, with public announcement Wednesday morning ("morning" and "evening" measured in North American east coast time zones). The slightly longer than usual delay is to let the Windows installer team put up a final Windows installer packa

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Magnus Hagander wrote: #ifdef WIN32 #include "win32.h" #ifndef _WIN32_IE #define _WIN32_IE 0x0400 I beleive his will break if _WIN32_IE is previously defined as something <0x0400. Not sure if we build with a patform SDK with that old defaults at all, but just to be sure it's probably better t

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
>>>The error appears to be on line that uses NEAR and complains >about it >>>... I see that the MinGW windef.h defines NEAR as empty, while >>>the MSVC >>>windef.h defines it as "near". Don't know if that makes a difference. >>> >>> >> >>Some reading up on MSDN gives this: >>http://msdn.mic

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
>Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Creating library .\Release\libpqdll.lib and object >.\Release\libpqdll.exp >> libpq.lib(fe-connect.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved >external symbol >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in function >_pqGetHomeDirectory >> .\Release\libpq.dll : fatal

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Creating library .\Release\libpqdll.lib and object .\Release\libpqdll.exp > libpq.lib(fe-connect.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol > [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in function _pqGetHomeDirectory > .\Release\libpq.dll : fatal error LNK11

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Magnus Hagander wrote: The error appears to be on line that uses NEAR and complains about it ... I see that the MinGW windef.h defines NEAR as empty, while the MSVC windef.h defines it as "near". Don't know if that makes a difference. Some reading up on MSDN gives this: http://msdn.microso

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
>>>The trouble seems to come from these 2 lines: >>> >>>+ #define _WIN32_IE 0x0400 >>>+ #include >>> >>>First, on MSVC, _WIN32_IE is already defined at that point. >If you get >>>around that then processing the include file causes errors. >>> >>> >> >>Interesting - mingw was supposed to use

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Magnus Hagander wrote: Recent changes to interfaces/libpg/fe-connect.c have broken MSVC builds, which I am reliably informed are definitely still required - at least some uses of libpq.dll made with gcc apparently cause the resulting builds or applications to blow up. Can you get some mor

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Lane
Chris Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems strtod() is to blame. > ... > on the PlayStation 2 returns: > input string is 'Infinity' > strtod returned val = inf > errno = 0 > endptr points to 'inity' > Would it be worth treating this case apart in float.c, or should we just

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4

2005-01-09 Thread Chris Mair
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 17:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Well, it does not readily explain that 'infinity' is rejected as invalid > input syntax. You should get an overflow or some large value, at > least. > > The relevant code is in src/backend/utils/adt/float.c. You're right. I had a look at

Re: [HACKERS] [PORTS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem

2005-01-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > Perhaps also the filename should be "-jp" not "-ja"? I agree with > the complainant that the former is more standard. ja = Japanese (ISO 639 language code) jp = Japan (ISO 3166 country code) Since the installation pack is probably targeted at users speaking Japanese, much like

Re: [pgsql-ru-general] [HACKERS] Final call for translation updates

2005-01-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Oleg Bartunov wrote: > I just completed russian translation of .po files ( except > ru.po for backend ). > diff against rc3 is available from > http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/docs/ru.po-8.0.0.rc3.diff.gz This patch doesn't apply cleanly. Please send the individual PO files. -- Peter Eis

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4

2005-01-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Chris Mair wrote: > The Playstation 2 hardware manuals confirm that the FPU has > no support for NaN and +/-Inf. That explains the regression diffs. > (EE Core User's Manual Version 5, p. 153) Well, it does not readily explain that 'infinity' is rejected as invalid input syntax. You should get a

Re: [HACKERS] subqueries in check

2005-01-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:06:58PM -0600, Jaime Casanova wrote: Jaime, > i was looking at the unsuported features in the RC4 > docs and found this: > > F671| Enhanced integrity management| Subqueries in CHECK| intentionally > omitted > > Why is it *intentionally omitted*? > Is it to hard? or

Re: [HACKERS] Home dir changes have broken MSVC builds

2005-01-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
>Recent changes to interfaces/libpg/fe-connect.c have broken >MSVC builds, >which I am reliably informed are definitely still required - at least >some uses of libpq.dll made with gcc apparently cause the resulting >builds or applications to blow up. Can you get some more specifics on that? We

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Final call for translation updates

2005-01-09 Thread Alin Vaida
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > With the 8.0 release around the corner, this is as good a time as ever > to send in the last translation updates. If your files are not in CVS > right now, I don't have them, so please send them again in this case. How much time do we have? Unfortunat