--On söndag, mars 27, 2005 04.34.03 +0300 Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On L, 2005-03-26 at 03:09 +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi!
...
I've noticed a couple of things about using the ICU patch vs. pristine
pg-8.0.1:
- ORDER BY is case insensitive when using ICU. This might break the
--On Montag, März 28, 2005 09:51:52 +0100 Simon Riggs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
If you have everything else working, it might be worth submitting a
patch for review? There may be other things required also.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
Well, the patch is far away from being ready for -patches
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not quite sure what question I should be asking of the Cygwin people.
> Tom, Can you suggest something?
It sounds to me like the problem is that the backend executing the test
script is in a tight loop (due to the half-baked implementation of slee
Reini Urban said:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin
installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing. If
nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platf
On L, 2005-03-26 at 03:09 +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> Hi!
>
...
> I've noticed a couple of things about using the ICU patch vs. pristine
> pg-8.0.1:
>
> - ORDER BY is case insensitive when using ICU. This might break the SQL
> standard (?), but sure is nice :)
How does your patch interac
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin
>>> installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing. If
>>> nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platform
>>> changes account
Neil Conway said:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:27:18PM +0500, imad wrote:
>>>I want to know is there any way to execute an anonymous PL/pgSQL block
>>>in PostgreSQL.
>>
>> No, there isn't.
>
> It might be possible to implement at least some of this functionality
> entirely
I 'll use a bound cursor with parameters.
But when I use such a cursor, I found a error.
I don't know error message.
How can I use a bound cursor.
in following sample, near a 'for loop' , error
found.
--
CREA
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:27:18PM +0500, imad wrote:
I want to know is there any way to execute an anonymous PL/pgSQL block
in PostgreSQL.
No, there isn't.
It might be possible to implement at least some of this functionality
entirely in the client. So:
BLOCK;
/* your pl/pg
