Bruce Momjian wrote:
Hey, I can work with this idea. First, there really is no 'off' mode
for wrapped because that is aligned...
Well, come to think of it, wrapped is not really a new output format
in the sense of html or latex. It could build on aligned:
\pset format aligned
Hello All.
Now I try to link dll with MinGW from Example in Postgres Help.
Linker show me this error:
D:\users\anthony\kursor\abzcrm\c\foogcc -shared foo.o -o foo.dll -L
d:/files/local/PostgreSQL/8.3/lib -l postgres
Cannot export ⌂postgres_NULL_THUNK_DATA: symbol not found
collect2: ld
Raphaël Jacquot wrote:
would seem like a good idea, no ?
http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2008/04/25/postgresql-has-no-bugzilla/
Before you come trolling on this (or any other) subject, please read the
voluminous debates that have taken place about it. Apparently you think
it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Before you come trolling on this (or any other) subject, please read the
voluminous debates that have taken place about it. Apparently you think it's
something we have never considered,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Bryce Nesbitt
wrote:
Well, come to think of it, wrapped is not really a new output format in
the sense of html or latex. It could build on aligned:
\pset format aligned [autowrap|nowrap|nnn]
I agree that
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 10:03 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 00:24 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 16:38 -0400, A.M. wrote:
MERGE will not invoke Rules. Does this imply that MERGE cannot be
used on views or that the resulting INSERTs or
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Hey, I can work with this idea. First, there really is no 'off' mode
for wrapped because that is aligned. What we could do is to have:
\pset format wrapped display
affect only output to the screen, using the screen width, and:
\pset format wrapped nnn
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Gregory Stark wrote:
I don't see that behavior here on Ubuntu 7.10:
$ COLUMNNS=120 ls -C |cat
archive cdinitrd lost+found proc srv usr
basement.usr dev initrd.img media root sys var
bin etc laptop
Andrew Dunstan escribió:
Tom Dunstan wrote:
So two alternative proposals, both with a 2 byte enum id and a 2 byte
value:
1 - We space the values out as evenly as we can across the 65000ish
range and allow people to delete, insert and append, but not reorder.
If they do the above
* Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080426 09:44]:
Why does the first 'ls' not honor columns while the second does? How
does 'ls' detect that the COLUMNS=120 is somehow different from the
default COLUMNS value?
I would hazard a guess that COLUMNS isn't exported from your
shell environment in
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Oops, Alvaro pointed out I typo'ed the variable name COLUMNS as
COLUMNNS. I see now that 'ls -C' does honor columns. See my later
posting about '\pset wrapped 0' as a special case where we could honor
the ioctl/COLUMNS case.
My real confusion is this:
$ echo
Jacques Caron wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question: is there currently a way to see how many slot are used in
the FSM (i.e. how many free pages are stored there), or how many are
free? If not, wouldn't it be a good idea to add this somewhere? (Don't
quite know where... is it possible to have
Gregory Stark wrote:
[Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in -- argh, I'm weak]
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI, ls -C actually wraps to 72(?) unless you specify another width,
I told you exactly what ls did, at least GNU ls. It uses -w if specified, if
not
Brendan Jurd wrote:
Having done that, please endeavour to make an actual contribution to the
discussion.
Hi Andrew,
Let's be fair. It would be an almost impossible task to make any
sense of the archives on this topic without dedicating tens of hours
to the task, and having access to a
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan escribió:
Tom Dunstan wrote:
So two alternative proposals, both with a 2 byte enum id and a 2 byte value:
1 - We space the values out as evenly as we can across the 65000ish
range and allow people to delete, insert and append, but not reorder.
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
Having done that, please endeavour to make an actual contribution
to the
discussion.
Hi Andrew,
Let's be fair. It would be an almost impossible task to make any
sense of the archives on this topic without dedicating tens of hours
to the task,
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I entered bugzilla on the archives search page and got this link,
right out of the recent discussion, at the top of the list:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00764.php
That and a few similar results might have given the OP some hints about
what
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see that behavior here on Ubuntu 7.10:
$ COLUMNNS=120 ls -C |cat
archive cdinitrd lost+found proc srv usr
basement.usr dev initrd.img media root sys var
bin etc laptop mnt
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Another alternative would be internally creating a different temporary
enum, rewriting the tables one by one each on its own transaction, and
finish by dropping the original enum and renaming the temporary one.
This solves the
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How would he know to search at the archives?
If he knew enough about the community to post in -hackers (as opposed
to, say, -general or -novice) he should certainly have heard of the
mailing list archives. *You* might find 'em useless but I don't.
Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How would he know to search at the archives?
If he knew enough about the community to post in -hackers (as opposed
to, say, -general or -novice) he should certainly have heard of the
You think so? (not being sarcastic).
mailing
I am leaving tomorrow/Sunday for a one-week trip for EnterpriseDB to
Mineapolis and Los Angeles. I will be offline most of the trip so I
will miss the start of the May commit fest.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:54:46AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
How would he know to search at the archives?
* There is no archives signature at the bottom of -hackers lists
Maybe because there's a perfectly functional archive link in the mail
headers? And because there's an RFC that tells
23 matches
Mail list logo
