On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:26, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
4. Is there any value in back-porting the Windows FSEEKO support into
8.3 and 8.2? Arguably, not writing the data offsets is a performance
bug. However a back-port won't do anything
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Uh, that doesn't fix anything: if you can't seek, a TOC at the end of
the file is useless. And the cases where the writer can't seek are
likely to be identically the ones where the reader can't seek, viz
pg_dump piped to
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Chris rfu...@gmail.com wrote:
I received two errors (described below) in installing 9.0beta2 on Kubuntu
10.04 , RhodiumToad on IRC recommended I post them here.
I did not have a 2.x or 3.x python dev installed, but I was really only
interested in python3 via
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Today, I tried to cancel the change of a tablespace for a table (ALTER
TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE). I got the Cancel request sent but the query
continued and finally succeed. It was a big issue for my customer, and
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that might be a good idea, too, but my expectation is that:
psql -f one -f two -f three
ought to behave in a manner fairly similar to:
cat one two three all
psql -f all
and it sounds like with this patch
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:17 AM, gabrielle gor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that might be a good idea, too, but my expectation is that:
psql -f one -f two -f three
ought to behave in a manner fairly similar to:
cat one
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I can reproduce this, here. The problem seems to be that plpython
only build either plpython2.so or plython3.so, but both languages
expect a call handler called plython_call_handler. So once we load
the shared library for one language, the other
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I can reproduce this, here. The problem seems to be that plpython
only build either plpython2.so or plython3.so, but both languages
expect a call handler called plython_call_handler.
in bufpage.h:
all blocks written out by an access method must be disk pages
but in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/storage-page-layout.html
Actually, index access methods need not use this page format. All the
existing index methods do use this basic format, but the data kept on
2010/6/18 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp:
Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This one, doesn't apply to head anymore... please update
Thank you for reviewing my patch!
I attached an updated patch set for partitioning syntax.
Isn't this linked from the RF web
On 23/06/10 18:17, Leonardo F wrote:
in bufpage.h:
all blocks written out by an access method must be disk pages
but in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/storage-page-layout.html
Actually, index access methods need not use this page format. All the
existing index methods do use this
Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/18 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp:
I attached an updated patch set for partitioning syntax.
Isn't this linked from the RF web app??
It should have been. Neither the reviewer nor the author updated
the CF web page (as
Andy Balholm a...@balholm.com wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
The only issue is with the general guideline to make the new code
blend in with existing code:
I deleted the excess comments and moved some lines around. Here it
is with the changes.
I ran pgindent
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
It should have been. Neither the reviewer nor the author updated
the CF web page (as they should have done). I've just made the
entries to bring the patch it up to date in the web app.
Yeah! sorry i got
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 23/06/10 18:17, Leonardo F wrote:
I'm not getting it: am I supposed to use the disk page format when
writing an index access method, or it's just a good practice because
it makes the handling easier? Given the docs it looks
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15/06/10 10:31, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
You could avoid changing the meaning of fn_expr by putting the check in
the parse analysis phase, into transformFuncCall(). That would feel
safer at
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Hi,
we improved ECPG quite a lot in 9.0 because we worked and
still working with an Informix to PostgreSQL migration project.
We came across a pretty big performance problem that can be seen in
every naive application that uses only FETCH 1, FETCH RELATIVE
or
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
I added a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call in the copy_relation_data(),
copy_dir(), and copy_file() functions. Works for me on ALTER TABLE ...
SET TABLESPACE and ALTER DATABASE
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here's a new version with several fewer bugs.
Since valid values for keepalives parameter are 0 and 1, its field size should
be 1 rather than 10.
Right ... although maybe
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here's a new version with several fewer bugs.
Since valid values for keepalives parameter are 0 and 1,
Le 23/06/2010 22:54, Tom Lane a écrit :
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
I added a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call in the copy_relation_data(),
copy_dir(), and copy_file() functions. Works for me on ALTER
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Robert Haas wrote:
I like the idea of being able to modify enums on the fly, but I'm
skeptical of an implementation that won't always work. Maybe it's
still better than what we have now, but it seems grotty.
I'd be perfectly
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Sorry to be commenting late, but don't most people want to add to the
end or beginning of the enum list, rather than in the middle, and can't
we support that already?
We could allow adding a value, but we couldn't guarantee where it would
appear in the
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Sorry to be commenting late, but don't most people want to add to the
end or beginning of the enum list, rather than in the middle, and can't
we support that already?
We could allow adding a value, but we couldn't guarantee where it
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Well, we don't need the enum value to map into the entire oid range.
Can't we just add one to the top-most value and see if there is a
conflict?
If you don't use the OID counter to generate the new value, you're going
to have problems with race
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Well, we don't need the enum value to map into the entire oid range.
Can't we just add one to the top-most value and see if there is a
conflict?
If you don't use the OID counter to generate the new value, you're going
to have
On Jun 22, 2010, at 1:34 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 20:53 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:51 PM, gabrielle gor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 14:50 -0400, Alvaro Herrera asked:
How does it play with ON_ERROR_STOP/ROLLBACK?
With
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I looked around quickly earlier when we chatted about this, and I
think I found an API call to change them for a socket as well - but a
Windows specific one, not the ones you'd find on Unix...
Magnus - or anyone who
On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mark Wong wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 1:34 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 20:53 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:51 PM, gabrielle gor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 14:50 -0400, Alvaro Herrera asked:
How does it play
29 matches
Mail list logo
