-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:22 PM
To: mark
Cc: 'pgsql-hackers'
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] issue with smlar exension and gist index
creation (9.2Beta1)
mark dvlh...@gmail.com writes:
I am playing around with 9.2Beta1
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com writes:
If that is the case, is there a convention we can use to separate the
parts of the connection string (in both
Hi all,
I am trying to build and store multiple tuples.The code is:
ExecClearTuple(slot);
/The code for fetching the data from which tuple will be formed../
for(;xy;x++){
tuple =
BuildTupleFromCStrings(TupleDescGetAttInMetadata(node-ss.ss_currentRelation-rd_att),
values);
ExecStoreTuple(tuple,
FYI, I finally committed the code installing a signal handler in PostGIS,
using the pqsignal function:
https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/changeset/9850
It is currently only used to interrupt GEOS calls, but the idea is that
it could eventually also be used to interrupt other library calls having
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Ants Aasma wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to keep it simple at first to find an answer to the question
if it's even worth trying before expending large effort on it. If
anyone with a multisocket machine would chip
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Atri Sharma atri.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to build and store multiple tuples.The code is:
ExecClearTuple(slot);
/The code for fetching the data from which tuple will be formed../
for(;xy;x++){
tuple =
Hi,
before I ask the main question, just a little background for one issue
we're currently having in Fedora 17:
PrivateTmp is a systemd's feature, which allows to have private /tmp
directory for services, which in turn means that such services aren't
able to access systems's /tmp directory.
Atri Sharma atri.j...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
I am trying to build and store multiple tuples.The code is:
ExecClearTuple(slot);
/The code for fetching the data from which tuple will be formed../
for(;xy;x++){
tuple =
On Jun6, 2012, at 15:50 , Honza Horak wrote:
before I ask the main question, just a little background for one issue we're
currently having in Fedora 17:
PrivateTmp is a systemd's feature, which allows to have private /tmp
directory for services, which in turn means that such services
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
Couldn't you simply tell postgres to put it's socket in, say, /var/run, and
create a symlink to that socket in the global /tmp directory?
FYI, this proposal emerged out of a discussion between Honza and
myself. Use a symlink was my first idea too, but on
On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 04:38:42 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
If we're going to have this at all, we should go all the way and
support an arbitrary number of sockets.
Well, that's what I wanted to discuss before Honza starts coding.
It's not obvious that
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 06 10:38:42 -0400 2012:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
Couldn't you simply tell postgres to put it's socket in, say, /var/run, and
create a symlink to that socket in the global /tmp directory?
FYI, this proposal emerged out of a discussion
On 06/06/2012 04:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 04:38:42 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Florian Pflugf...@phlo.org writes:
If we're going to have this at all, we should go all the way and
support an arbitrary number of sockets.
Well, that's what I wanted to discuss before
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 06 10:38:42 -0400 2012:
(BTW, we would probably just adopt the Debian solution if we were
sure there were no non-libpq clients out there; but we aren't.)
Maybe this is a good time to make the
Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/06/2012 04:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 04:38:42 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Florian Pflugf...@phlo.org writes:
If we're going to have this at all, we should go all the way and
support an arbitrary number of sockets.
Well,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:32:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I had forgotten that conversation, but it does seem like there is
interest in this type of configuration. Can anybody confirm that
dropping a socket into a chroot or jail would actually work, ie
make it possible to connect from inside
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com writes:
If that is the case, is there a
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 04:18:44 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 03:32:08 PM Tom Lane wrote:
I got this last night in a perfectly standard build of HEAD:
+ WARNING: page is not marked all-visible but visibility map bit is set
in
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Well, that's what I wanted to discuss before Honza starts coding.
It's not obvious that there are any use-cases for more than two.
It's also not clear whether there is any value in supporting run-time
rather than build-time
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Works for me. We still need a (reworked) patch, though, right? We just
move where the move between seconds and milliseconds happens?
Attached is the updated version of the patch.
I definitely don't think we need
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On a cursory lock it might just be a race condition in
vacuumlazy.c:lazy_scan_heap. If scan_all is set, which it has to be for the
warning to be visible, all_visible_according_to_vm is determined before we
loop over
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Right now, pg_receivexlog sets:
replymsg-write
Right now, you can't directly create a relation (table, index,
composite type) in the pg_catalog schema, but you can create a
non-relation (function, domain, etc.) in the pg_catalog schema.
Furthermore, you can create a table in some other schema and then move
it into the pg_catalog schema using
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Alastair Turner b...@ctrlf5.co.za wrote:
A one-line change adds the SSL info on its own line like
--
You are connected to database scratch as user scratch on host
127.0.0.1 at port 5432.
SSL connection (cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits: 256)
--
Does
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Right now, pg_receivexlog sets:
replymsg-write
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Sergey Koposov kopo...@ast.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I've quickly tested your lockfree-getbuffer.patch patch with the test case
you provided and I barely see any improvement (2% at max)
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B7koR68V2nM1QVBxWGpZdW4wd0U
tested with 24 core (48
On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 08:19:15 PM Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On a cursory lock it might just be a race condition in
vacuumlazy.c:lazy_scan_heap. If scan_all is set, which it has to be for
the warning to be visible,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
Thoughts?
Simon already proposed a way of doing this that doesn't require
explicit user action, which seems preferable to a method that does
require explicit user action, even though it's a little harder to
implement. His idea
In commit 18fb9d8d21a28caddb72c7ffbdd7b96d52ff9724, Simon modified the
rule for when to skip checkpoints on the grounds that not enough
activity has happened since the last one. However, that commit left the
comment block about it in a nonsensical state:
* If this isn't a shutdown or forced
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 08:42:43 PM Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On Monday, May 28, 2012 07:11:53 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Does anybody have a better idea than to either call WalSndWakeup() at
essentially the wrong places or calling it inside a
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
In commit 18fb9d8d21a28caddb72c7ffbdd7b96d52ff9724, Simon modified the
rule for when to skip checkpoints on the grounds that not enough
activity has happened since the last one. However, that commit left the
comment block
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Ants Aasma wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Sergey Koposov kopo...@ast.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I've quickly tested your lockfree-getbuffer.patch patch with the test case
you provided and I barely see any improvement (2% at max)
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jun 06 14:45:46 -0400 2012:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Alastair Turner b...@ctrlf5.co.za wrote:
A one-line change adds the SSL info on its own line like
--
You are connected to database scratch as user scratch on host
127.0.0.1 at
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Daniel
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:09:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Sabino Mullane g...@endpoint.com writes:
We have a 8.3.18 system (yes, the same one from the previous
thread, finally upgraded!) that gave us this error yesterday:
ERROR: index pg_class_oid_index is not a btree
That means
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
However, not throwing errors on the URL syntax should be considered a
bug, I think.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Sergey Koposov kopo...@ast.cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Ants Aasma wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Sergey Koposov kopo...@ast.cam.ac.uk
wrote:
I've quickly tested your lockfree-getbuffer.patch patch with the test
case
you provided and I barely
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
In commit 18fb9d8d21a28caddb72c7ffbdd7b96d52ff9724, Simon modified the
rule for when to skip checkpoints on the grounds that not enough
activity has happened since the last one.
IIRC,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I felt (and still feel) that this was misguided.
Looking at it again, I'm inclined to agree. The behavior was entirely
correct up until somebody decided to emit a continuing stream of
XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS WAL records even when
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Right now, you can't directly create a relation (table, index,
composite type) in the pg_catalog schema, but you can create a
non-relation (function, domain, etc.) in the pg_catalog schema.
Surely this is true only for superusers. Superusers can do
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I think this is the expected result. In the single user case the
spinklock never spins and only has to make the cpu-locking cache
instructions once. can we see results @24 threads?
Here
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B7koR68V2nM1NDJHLUhNSS0zbUk
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I felt (and still feel) that this was misguided.
Looking at it again, I'm inclined to agree. The behavior was entirely
correct up until somebody decided to emit a continuing stream of
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Right now, you can't directly create a relation (table, index,
composite type) in the pg_catalog schema, but you can create a
non-relation (function, domain, etc.) in the pg_catalog
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
rhaas=# create table pg_catalog.tom (a int);
ERROR: permission denied to create pg_catalog.tom
The offending error check is in heap_create(), and based on what
you're saying here it seems like we should just rip it out.
Hmm. Yeah, it seems like the
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
However, not throwing errors on the URL syntax should be considered a
bug, I think.
+1.
+1
Here's a patch that just makes the thing an error.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com
I wrote:
Actually, it looks like there is an extremely simple way to handle this,
which is to move the call of LogStandbySnapshot (which generates the WAL
record in question) to before the checkpoint's REDO pointer is set, but
after we have decided that we need a checkpoint.
On further
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 03:08:05PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
Thoughts?
Simon already proposed a way of doing this that doesn't require
explicit user action, which seems preferable to a method that does
require explicit
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 15:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
Thoughts?
Simon already proposed a way of doing this that doesn't require
explicit user action, which seems preferable to a method that does
require explicit user
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:21:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Is everyone ready for me to run pgindent? We are nearing the first
commit-fest (June 15) and will have to branch the git
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:26:04PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
I propose a special user-initiated loading mode at the table
granularity. During this time, readers must ignore PD_ALL_VISIBLE,
HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED, and the visibility map entirely. However, writers
may set all of those bits before
On 5/30/12 4:42 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
I was thinking about what is the earliest time where we could set hint
bits. This would be just after the commit has been made visible.
Except that's only true when there are no other transactions running. That's
been one of the big sticking points about
On 5/28/12 2:55 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
As far as CSV goes, I think the biggest deficiency is that there's a
mismatch between the way that log files are typically named (e.g. one
per day, or one per hour) and the way that a CSV foreign table is
created (you've got to point it at one particular
There has been regular griping in this list about our dependence on SysV
shared memory, but not so much about SysV semaphores, even though the
latter cause their fair share of issues; as seen for example in
buildfarm member spoonbill's recent string of failures:
creating template1 database in
55 matches
Mail list logo
