On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 12:54 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The use-case for this is tracking a chosen subtree of contexts - e.g.
aggcontext and below, so I'd expect the tracked subtrees to be relatively
shallow. Am I right?
Right.
My fear is that by removing the inheritance bit, we'll hurt cases
On 19/08/14 23:14, Vivek Singh Raghuwanshi wrote:
Hi All,
Please let me know is that possible to use Openstack Trove with Postgres-XC.
With instances and Baremetal (after Juno Release).
I Know it is possible to use other medium like MySQL or PostgreSQL, but
i am not sure about XC.
AFAIK [1],
15 July 2014 19:29 Amit Kapila Wrote,
Implementation details:
---
1. This feature is implemented only for tar format in windows
as native windows utilites are not able to create symlinks while
extracting files from tar (It might be possible to create symlinks
if
On 08/20/2014 03:35 AM, Vladislav Sterzhanov wrote:
Hi there, pg-Hackers!
Here I go with the patch which brings up the possibility to perform
nearest-neighbour searches on SP-GiSTs (as of now includes implementation
for quad and kd trees). Pre-reviewed by my GSoC mentor Alexander Korotkov.
Per the schedule agreed on in the Developer Meeting in Ottawa, the
August commitfest began five days ago.
We don't seem to have a commitfest manager, and the commitfest has so
far failed to manage itself. To get things going, I'm picking up the
Commitfest Manager Mace I found from behind the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
Per the schedule agreed on in the Developer Meeting in Ottawa, the August
commitfest began five days ago.
We don't seem to have a commitfest manager, and the commitfest has so far
failed to manage itself. To
On 08/19/2014 04:27 AM, Brightwell, Adam wrote:
Hi All,
This is a proof-of-concept patch for a new model around role attributes
and fine grained permissions meant to alleviate the current over dependence
on superuser.
Hmm. How does this get us any closer to fine-grained permissions? I
guess
On 08/20/2014 10:42 AM, David Rowley wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
Per the schedule agreed on in the Developer Meeting in Ottawa, the August
commitfest began five days ago.
We don't seem to have a commitfest manager, and the
On 07/07/2014 11:46 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2014-07-07 14:02:15 +0530, amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Other than some minor comments as mentioned below, I don't have any
more issues, it looks all good.
Thank you. (Updated patch attached.)
I don't think the new
I have cleaned up the Commitfest of patches that have been in Waiting
for Author state for weeks or more. I believe the list is now an
accurate representation of the actual state of the patches.
Patch authors
-
Please check if a patch of yours is in Waiting for Author state. It
On 08/15/2014 04:58 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:40:59PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Heh. I'm not particularly averse to changing this, but I guess I
don't see any particular benefit of changing it either. Either comma
or comma-space is a legal separator, so why worry
Hi Andres,
Are you planning to continue working on this? Summarizing the discussion
so far:
* Robert listed a bunch of little cleanup tasks
(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmozshvvqjakul6p3kdvzvpibtgkzoti3m+fvvjg5v+x...@mail.gmail.com).
Amit posted yet more detailed commends.
*
On 07/25/2014 07:10 PM, Alexey Klyukin wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to propose a patch for checking subject alternative names entry in
the SSL certificate for DNS names during SSL authentication.
Thanks! I just ran into this missing feature last week, while working on
my SSL test suite. So +1
Hi Ashutish,
(2014/08/14 22:30), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/08/08 18:51), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
(2014/06/30 22:48), Tom Lane wrote:
I wonder whether it isn't
Hi,
On 2014-08-20 12:43:05 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Are you planning to continue working on this?
Yes, I am! I've recently been on holiday and now I'm busy with catching
up with everything that has happened since. I hope to have a next
version ready early next week.
Greetings,
Andres
Hi Noah,
Thank you for the review!
(2014/07/02 11:23), Noah Misch wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 05:04:06PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Attached is the rebased patch of v11 up to the current master.
I've been studying this patch.
SELECT FOR UPDATE on the inheritance parent fails with a
Hi Heikki,
(2014/08/20 17:50), Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I have cleaned up the Commitfest of patches that have been in Waiting
for Author state for weeks or more. I believe the list is now an
accurate representation of the actual state of the patches.
Thank you for the work!
I chaged the
Hi,
I have reviewed this:
I have initialize cur_lineno to UINTMAX - 2. And then observed following
behaviour to check wrap-around.
postgres=# \set PROMPT1 '%/[%l]%R%# '
postgres[18446744073709551613]=# \set PROMPT2 '%/[%l]%R%# '
postgres[18446744073709551613]=# select
On 07/20/2014 07:17 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 19.7.2014 20:24, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 13.7.2014 21:32, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The current patch only implemnents this for tuples in the main
hash table, not for skew buckets. I plan to do that, but it will
require separate chunks for each skew
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If the Debian guidelines think that only SO major version need
be considered, they're wrong, at least for the way we've been treating
that.
The Debian approach is that you should have precisely one installed
copy of a library
I think this has had enough review for a WIP patch. I'm marking this as
Returned with Feedback in the commitfest because:
* should use LSNs instead of a md5
* this doesn't do anything useful on its own, hence would need to see
the whole solution before committing
* not clear how this would be
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Is there a way to create a link to a file which only exists as an open
file descriptor? If there was, you could create a temp file, open an
fd, then delete the file. That would remove the issue with files being
c.f.:
O_TMPFILE (since Linux 3.11)
Create an unnamed temporary file. The pathname argument
specifies a directory; an unnamed inode will be created in
that directory's filesystem. Anything written to the
resulting file will be lost
On 20 Srpen 2014, 14:05, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 07/20/2014 07:17 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 19.7.2014 20:24, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 13.7.2014 21:32, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The current patch only implemnents this for tuples in the main
hash table, not for skew buckets. I plan to do that,
Greg Stark wrote:
char path[PATH_MAX];
fd = open(/path/to/dir, O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR,
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
/* File I/O on 'fd'... */
snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, /proc/self/fd/%d,
On 2014-08-19 17:42:06 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
MauMau wrote:
With that said, copying to a temporary file like dest.tmp and
renaming it to dest sounds worthwhile even as a basic copy
utility. I want to avoid copying to a temporary file with a fixed
name like _copy.tmp, because some
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-08-19 17:42:06 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
MauMau wrote:
With that said, copying to a temporary file like dest.tmp and
renaming it to dest sounds worthwhile even as a basic copy
utility. I want to avoid copying to a temporary file with a fixed
name
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hmm, the real trick here is linkat(... /proc/self/foobar), not the
O_TMPFILE: you can have an open file descriptor to an invisible file
simply by creating a normal file and unlinking it. I looked at linkat()
On 2014-08-20 09:50:56 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-08-19 17:42:06 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
MauMau wrote:
With that said, copying to a temporary file like dest.tmp and
renaming it to dest sounds worthwhile even as a basic copy
utility. I want
Greg Stark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hmm, the real trick here is linkat(... /proc/self/foobar), not the
O_TMPFILE: you can have an open file descriptor to an invisible file
simply by creating a normal file and unlinking it. I
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-08-20 09:50:56 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
Isn't this a solution looking for a problem? We're using tempfiles in
dozens of other places and I really don't see why this is the place to
stop doing so. Just copy to
On 2014-08-20 10:19:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-08-20 09:50:56 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
Isn't this a solution looking for a problem? We're using tempfiles in
dozens of other places and I really don't see why this
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Dilip kumar dilip.ku...@huawei.com
wrote:
I have reviewed the patch and did not find any major comments.
Thanks for the review.
There are some comments I would like to share with you
1. Rebase the patch to current GIT head.
Done.
2. +
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-08-20 10:19:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alternatively, you could use the process PID as part of the temp file
name; which is probably a good idea anyway.
I think that's actually worse, because nothing will clean up those
unless you
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
On 08/15/2014 04:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I'd prefer to go to the all-lengths approach, but a large
part of that comes from a subjective assessment that the hybrid approach
is too messy. Others might well disagree.
... So, that extraction test
On 17 August 2014 21:45, Fabrízio de Royes Mello fabriziome...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-28
Hello,
I am trying to patch the server source to increase the number of columns
above 1600. I'm not planning to commit this but as suggested elsewhere
[1], someone might suggest a configure option based on this.
I came up with a patch which seems to work (see below), but 3 of the 136
tests
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:29:39AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
What's the status of the delta relations in AFTER triggers
patch? I saw you had a lively discussion with Amit in the last
two weeks, but I couldn't tell if it's still Needs
Mayeul Kauffmann mayeul.kauffm...@free.fr writes:
I am trying to patch the server source to increase the number of columns
above 1600. I'm not planning to commit this but as suggested elsewhere
[1], someone might suggest a configure option based on this.
I came up with a patch which seems to
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
Hi Fabrizio,
+ This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to
permanent or
+ from unlogged to permanent (see xref
linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).
Shouldn't this read unlogged to permanent or from
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-JJ]
kbak...@its.jnj.com wrote:
My proof of concept code (steps a though e below) avoided any reading or
writing to the pipe (and associated handling of SIGPIPE), it just relied on
postmaster open of PIPE with ENXIO to indicate all is
Tom wrote:
You would have to show us the actual failure diffs to get much useful
comment, but in general increasing the size of tuple headers could
easily lead to
changes in plan choices
Thank you Tom. So there is some hope! In effect the query plan is
different for the join and the view
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:29:39AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
The patch that David offered to use the tuplestores in C should
probably be updated to show both direct use based on what is in
TriggerData and SPI use. I will leave that to David to
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 09:59:11AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:29:39AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
The patch that David offered to use the tuplestores in C should
probably be updated to show both direct use based on what is
Mayeul Kauffmann mayeul.kauffm...@free.fr writes:
Tom wrote:
You would have to show us the actual failure diffs to get much useful
comment, but in general increasing the size of tuple headers could
easily lead to changes in plan choices
Thank you Tom. So there is some hope! In effect the
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
After switching primary serer while using repliaction slot, the
standby server will not able to connect new primary server.
Hi,
On 13.8.2014 19:17, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 13.8.2014 17:52, Tom Lane wrote:
* I'm a bit dubious about testing -DRANDOMIZE_ALLOCATED_MEMORY in the
same build as -DCLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY, because each of these is
darned expensive and it's not clear you'd learn anything by running
them
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Being able to batch inner and outer relations in a matching way is
certainly one of the reasons why hashjoin uses that particular scheme.
There are other reasons, though - for example being able to answer 'Does
this group
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.
+Number of parallel connections to perform the
Robert and Tom,
Sorry for any confusion, I will try to clarify.
Here is progression of events as I recall them:
- My Initial QNX 6.5 port proposal lacked a robust replacement for the existing
System V shared memory locking mechanism, a show stopper.
- Robert proposed a nice set of possible
On 08/20/2014 08:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Since it's looking like this might be the direction we want to go, I took
the time to flesh out my proof-of-concept patch. The attached version
takes care of cosmetic issues (like fixing the comments), and includes
code to avoid O(N^2) penalties in
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
This means we need a beta3, no?
If we change the on-disk format, I'd say so. So we don't want to wait
around too long before deciding.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
On 20/08/14 18:17, Tom Lane wrote:
Hm. I think the without_oid test is not showing that anything is broken;
The other tests aren't showing any functional issue either AFAICS.
Thanks a lot Tom! That's very helpful.
I have written more details and some basic SQL tests in the wiki of the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had a look at this patch, and here are a couple of comments:
1) Depending on how ArchiveEntry is called to register an object to
dump, namespace may be NULL, but it is not the case
namespace-dobj.name, so you
Hi,
attached is a small patch which updates doc/src/sgml/func.sgml. The
change explains that functions like round() and others might behave
different depending on your operating system (because of rint(3)) and
that this is according to an IEEE standard. It also points out that #.5
is not
Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-JJ] wrote:
Please let me know if more discussion is required, or if it would be
reasonable for me (or someone else of your choosing) to work on the
coding effort (perhaps targeted for 9.5?)
If on the other hand it has been decided that a QNX port is not in the
cards,
On 08/20/2014 08:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
On 08/15/2014 04:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I'd prefer to go to the all-lengths approach, but a large
part of that comes from a subjective assessment that the hybrid approach
is too messy. Others might well
Alvaro,
Thanks for your interest and questions.
At this point I have created a proof-of-concept QNX 6.5 port which appears to
work on the surface (passes regression tests), but needs to be deemed
production-quality.
To work around lack of SA_RESTART, I added QNX-specific retry macros to port.h
What data are you using right now Josh?
There's the github archive http://www.githubarchive.org/
Here's some sample data https://gist.github.com/igrigorik/2017462
--
Arthur Silva
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 08/20/2014 08:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:36:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-08-20 10:19:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alternatively, you could use the process PID as part of the temp file
name; which is probably a good idea anyway.
I think that's actually
On 2014-08-20 18:58:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:36:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-08-20 10:19:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alternatively, you could use the process PID as part of the temp file
name; which is
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
So here's v16, rebased on top of 9bac66020. As far as I am concerned,
this is the last version before I start renaming everything to BRIN and
then commit.
FWIW in case you or others have interest, here's the diff between your
patch and v16. Also, for illustrative
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
I just change if (tbinfo-dobj.namespace != NULL) to if
(tbinfo-dobj.namespace).
Fine for me. I am marking this patch as ready for committer.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:05:07PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
But more to the point, I thought the consensus was to use the
highest LSN of all the blocks in the file, no? That's essentially
free to calculate (if you have to read all the data anyway), and
isn't vulnerable to collisions.
Hi,
On 2014-08-20 21:21:41 +, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-JJ] wrote:
To work around lack of SA_RESTART, I added QNX-specific retry macros to port.h
With these macros in place make check runs cleanly (fails in many place
without them).
+#if defined(__QNX__)
+/* QNX does not support
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:05:07PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
But more to the point, I thought the consensus was to use the
highest LSN of all the blocks in the file, no? That's essentially
free to calculate (if you
On 2014-07-25 18:29:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
* QNX lacks sigaction SA_RESTART: I modified src/include/port.h
to define macros to retry system calls upon EINTR (open,read,write,...)
when compiled on QNX
That's pretty scary too. For one thing, such macros would affect every
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
I just change if (tbinfo-dobj.namespace != NULL) to if
(tbinfo-dobj.namespace).
Fine for me. I am marking this patch as
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:26:56PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
I think there's been some improvement since I last had to go through the
pain of setting this all up, and some of it is undoubtably OpenSSL's
fault, but there's definitely quite a bit more we could be doing to make
SSL support
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:47:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
BTW, if we're beating on libpq, I wonder if we shouldn't consider
bumping the soversion at some point. I mean, I know that we
technically don't need to do that if we're only *adding*
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Jeevan Chalke
jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi,
I have reviewed this:
I have initialize cur_lineno to UINTMAX - 2. And then observed following
behaviour to check wrap-around.
postgres=# \set PROMPT1 '%/[%l]%R%# '
postgres[18446744073709551613]=#
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Ashutish,
(2014/08/14 22:30), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/08/08 18:51), Etsuro
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
You added check_synchronous_standby_num() as the GUC check function for
synchronous_standby_num, and checked that there. But that seems to be
wrong.
You can easily see the following error messages even if
When replication slot is not specified in pg_receivexlog, the flush
location in the feedback message always indicates invalid. So there seems
to be no need to send the feedback as soon as fsync is issued, in that
case.
How should this option work when replication slot is not specified?
75 matches
Mail list logo
