On Tuesday 30 July 2002 11:51 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CREATE DATABASE foo WITH LOCATION = 'BAR'
And requires you to be a database superuser anyway.
CREATE DATABASE does not require superuser privs, only createdb
which is not usually considered particular
.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in length, the other is finite.
Distances, etc are calculated differently between the two types.
For some of my work a type of 'ray' would be nice... :-) But LSEG's usually
work OK as long as you specify an endpoint that is far enough away.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
necessary?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list
[cc: trimmed]
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 03:42 am, Jan Wieck wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
As a note of interest, RPM itself is backed by a database, db3. Prior to
version 4.x, it was backed by db1. Upgrading between the versions of RPM
is simply -- installing db3 and dependenies, upgrade RPM
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 09:11 am, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 01:09, Lamar Owen wrote:
The wc utility isn't in the path in an OS install situation. The df
utility isn't in the path, either. You can use python, though. :-) Not
that that would be a good thing
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 11:48 am, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 16:20, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 09:11 am, Hannu Krosing wrote:
And I have written custom postgres table dumpers in python without too
much effort (except reverse-engineering the page
, particularly the fortran to python
translator.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 04:42 pm, Jan Wieck wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 03:24 am, Jan Wieck wrote:
The problem why this conflicts with these package managers is,
because they work package per package, instead of looking at the
big picture. Who said you can
to binary on the fly.
This is the best dialog yet on the issue of upgrading. Keep it coming! :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe
of an old package to remain around. The new package
must be self-contained and must be able to upgrade the old data, or they will
not accept it.
Their statement now is simply that PostgreSQL upgrading is broken; dump before
upgrading and complain to the PostgreSQL developers.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR
) run post-upgrade (initdb; psql dumpfile)
All but the first step works fine. The first step is impossible in the
environment in which the %pre script runs.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 04:17 pm, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 22:10, Lamar Owen wrote:
The pre-upgrade script is run in an environment that isn't robust enough
to handle that. What if you run out of disk space during the dump?
You can either check beforehand or abort
is [coherent]). Can our core be written/rewritten in
such a way as to be _completely_ object driven? Someone steeped a little
better in object theory please take over now
Or am I totally out in left field here?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 07:19 pm, Rod Taylor wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 19:09, Lamar Owen wrote:
And what if you have enough disk space to do the dump, but then that
causes the OS upgrade to abort because there wasn't enough space left to
finish upgrading (larger packages, perhaps
[replying to myself]
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 07:34 pm, Lamar Owen wrote:
if you do this. Already RPM can rollback the transaction being done on the
RPM database (it's a db3 database system), but rolling back the filesystem
is a little different.
As a note of interest, RPM itself is backed
On Saturday 06 July 2002 11:15 am, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:39:13PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
One other usability note: why can't postmaster perform the steps of
an initdb if -D points to an empty directory?
Rank newbies
, particularly those where a backend cannot be run for whatever
reason, but you need your data (corrupted system catalogs, high system load,
whatever). Upgrading is just one of those contexts.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 03:14 pm, Jan Wieck wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
[...]
Martin O has come up with a 'pg_fsck' utility that, IMHO, holds a great
deal of promise for seamless binary 'in place' upgrading. He has been
able to write code to read multiple versions' database structures
, Lotus Approach,
and others, allow you to convert the old to the new as part of initial
startup. This will be a prerequisite for wide acceptance in the Windows
world, methinks.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
this idea, but let me just bring one little issue to note: are you
going to handle upgrades, and if so, how? How are you going to do a major
version upgrade?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you
On Thursday 20 June 2002 02:57 pm, Jan Wieck wrote:
set of triggers where working, and then Stephan did all the others and I
forgot who else helped to do the utility commands and CREATE TABLE
syntax and tried to decrypt the SQL definitions?
Don Baccus?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1
. Is it a job for two patch
managers, one for the STABLE and one for the DEV? Only Bruce can answer
whether he can realistically handle it (I personally have confidence he can).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
On Monday 10 June 2002 04:11 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Historically we've concentrated our development efforts during beta to
'fixing beta problems only'
There is a downside to changing away from that approach.
There are downsides to every approach
.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(same as Red Hat 7.3's version). They are different. And, IMO, those
results are the 'expected' results on a unixoid system, ISO or no ISO.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:58 pm, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 10:51, Lamar Owen wrote:
What isn't funny is Oliver Elphick's results on Debian, running glibc
2.2.5 (same as Red Hat 7.3's version).
This is a completely different version. Once Debian updates (in a few
years
didn't mean to step on your toes by any of my comments; I
completely agree with you that glibc and the ISO C standard cited are daft in
this.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list
Hat. Loudly. However, as this is a glibc change, other
distributors are very likely to fold in this change sooner rather than later.
Try using timestamp without timezone?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 12:31 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
However, as this is a glibc change, other
distributors are very likely to fold in this change sooner rather than
later.
Relying on nonstandardized/nondocumented behaviour is a program bug
blind to the regular locale-induced failures -- this is not a
good thing.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 06:09 pm, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 18:24, Lamar Owen wrote:
In any case, this isn't just a Red Hat problem, as it's going to cause
problems with the use of timestamps on ANY glibc 2.2.5 dist. That's more
than Red Hat, by a large margin.
I'm
to ferret out the source of this bug? More to the point: we
need a test case in C that could expose this as a glibc bug. Methinks Red
Hat would want this bug ferretted out, as it would likely cause problems with
RedHat Database on RH 7.3's glibc.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
[HACKERS added to cc:, GENERAL dropped]
On Monday 20 May 2002 11:39 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I went to bat for this a little bit ago, relating to a bug report,
but I've struck out. The ISO C standard spells it out plainly that dates
before 1970
Since the Epoch', then cross-reference to the
man page of mktime.
I don't like it any more than you do, but that is the letter of the standard.
Thomas, any comments?
Our implementation is broken, then. Thomas, is this fixable for a 7.2.x
release, or something for 7.3?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR
and seeing it through
at least two major cycles.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
On Thursday 09 May 2002 07:51 am, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD
license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their
development work. So there is no risk of backflow
/pgsql/)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
. Not pretty to support. Still at 6.5.3,
too.
We need a better upgrade path, but that's a different discussion.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
built.
There was another fellow built the RPMset on RH 7.1 a week or so ago, and he
said the rebuild worked just fine.
As I don't have a RH 7.1 machine to build on, this is the best I can do.
Sorry.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
. Or
even s/Free/BSD-licensed/g if you want to really state the obvious. :-)
If other projects' members are insulted by that, then they're just too
sensitive.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe
.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list
news. Really good news.
The delay was worth it, I guess. I have also had a report of a Red Hat 7.1
user getting a rebuild without difficulty. Good things.
Although I wonder how many have downloaded the Red Hat 6.2 SPARC RPM's I
uploaded. :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
transaction
This seems the correct behavior.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
[Trimmed CC list]
On Sunday 14 April 2002 01:52 am, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Sun, 2002-04-14 at 08:48, Lamar Owen wrote:
Incidentally, the 7.2.93 (skipjack) public beta is a serious improvement
over RHL 7.2, and I personally recommend it, as KDE 3 is worth the
upgrade, even to a beta
On Sunday 14 April 2002 03:00 pm, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 02:35:13PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
Raw performance seems to be increased as well, due to an improved kernel
(2.4.18 plus low-latency and preemptible patches, according to the kernel
source RPM
to
Larry Rosenman, even though I've not availed myself of that access as yet.
Other none-RedHat RPM-based distributions are not directly supported by me,
although SuSE 7.3 on UltraSparc may be supported in the future, as I have an
Ultra 5 running that dist.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1
. And they serve a
useful purpose -- keeping us on our toes and reminded that even the best and
brightest open source development team around can make mistakes.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you
to release without the contrib tree packaged,
due to build errors.
Stay tuned for the latest.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister
is rather broken according to the results of the
discussion on general. Do we really want a whole 'nother major version cycle
to pass before this kludge is fixed? Six months to a year down the road?
The longer this behavior is in the code, the harder it's going to be to
remove it, IMNSHO.
--
Lamar
familiar with the workingsof a project this size.
That's really all I have to say about that on-list.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users
On Friday 05 October 2001 07:48 pm, John Summerfield wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
I made it clear I was getting frustrated. Read in that context, I think it
was pretty mild;-)
But it was done in an uninformed way. Had you read the previous two-three
weeks of the archives
, and you
change the source document to reflect a change, but the build fails due to
that very layout change, it can get pretty ugly. And that's exactly what
happened, from my perspective.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 07:53 pm, John Summerfield wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote:
Time to get your act together fellas.
This is open source John, not rocket science. (pun intended)
Hmm. Kids I was at school
of minor server issues (that
are being worked out right now, even as I write, by highly capable
professionals, who, BTW, are doing this on a volunteer basis).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you
in the past myself, you and
Vince have my gratitude and, well, sympathy, over this, as a dynamic website
and ftpsite move by itself is never trivial. And there are many more details
here than a typical site move
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end
been, is it still the master for the ftp site, or?
A map of the developer _sites_ would be a good addition to the developer's
corner, IMHO, unless people have security concerns that would prevent that.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
through the differences, and
get things smooth again, Marc's hard work in upgrading the server situation
is sure to reap benefits if we'll be patient as he works out the kinks.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
a few weeks ago to find out what I
see in 'open source nature.'
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 20 September 2001 12:47 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday 20 September 2001 08:58 am, mlw wrote:
Has this changed, in any way, the development path of PostgreSQL?
Just my personal opinion:
long before Great Bridge was on the map
is high -- but PostgreSQL cannot be orphaned in that
sense due to its open source nature.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs
:-)).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
getting ready to go into beta, and I was getting ready to ramp up to
deal with 7.2beta RPMs anyway. This just quickens the issue.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go
. If I can build a reasonably portable
jar of our JDBC,I'm willing to try.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL
may want to start there, not the Red H?at package (which is close,
but not identical, to ours).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
have their place.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
.
Trying to fix this for the RPMS -- the RPATH contains the buildroot instead
of where the libs really are. Could cause security problems. Working on it,
but it's slow going for me at this busy time.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 17:51, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
I disagree. Unless you are omniscient,
We need someone willing to be a kibo. Or is that too arcane a reference?
Gotta admit, I haven't heard that in a while.
Egads! An Internet where
the hackers list (which I know he's subscribed to). Up to a week
after reading it once already.
My mail spool filesystem has severl GB of free space, too. Unless my
sendmail installation is doing funny things. :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end
a broken
PostgreSQL Python DB-API 2.0 client, AFAICT.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 11:59, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
Red Hat makes mission-critical use of bugzilla running on Oracle. See
bugzilla.redhat.com. And ask the Red Hat people on these lists their
opinions of bugzilla.
What who thinks of what has
and even obnoxious in their comments doesn't
automatically disqualify what they say from validity.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge
of the recent replies
The best thing to do is simply to expect propagation delay.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
.
X-PostgreSQL-bug-ID: anyone? Or leave the bug ID number in the subject? Then
the replies can be properly inserted into the database as belonging to an ID.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get
I disagree. Unless you are omniscient, we will only ever have a partial
list.
but there wasn't enough interest for someone to take on
the maintenance.
We need someone willing to be a kibo. Or is that too arcane a reference?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
bugzilla.redhat.com. And ask the Red Hat people on these lists their
opinions of bugzilla.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail
rebuild just fine on most any LSB-compliant
RPM-based Linux. README.rpm-dist has instructions on how to rebuild, and
improved instructions on building just what packages you need.
Changelog from PostgreSQL-7.1.2-5PGDG RPMset:
* Fri Aug 17 2001 Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- 7.1.3-1PGDG
- Kerberos
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 14:56, Tom Lane wrote:
Ok. This is the second time I have seen this message -- but this one is
delayed by a week. Marc?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading
On Friday 20 July 2001 19:56, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How is this search path defined? Blindly using libdir is not ok --
Why not?
During RPM build, libdir will point to /usr/lib. This is OK and appropriate
for the generally-loadable shared libs. HOWEVER
but
the last 7.0.3 RPM will be removed, etc. A full RPMset across three or more
platforms plus source takes a bit of space :-) ftp/pub/binary is only up
to 353356 blocks, and /home/projects/pgsql is now down to 446308 free.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
[cc: to GENERAL replacedby cc: to HACKERS]
On Friday 20 July 2001 17:14, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The biggest patching by far is
in the regression tests, which really are not designed to live outside
the source tree, but can be munged into shape fairly easily
On Friday 20 July 2001 18:45, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On to the next batch There are a few perl and python scripts shipped
as examples -- every last one of them shebangs to '/usr/local/perl' or
'/usr/local/python' -- to make them usable, I patch
On Thursday 19 July 2001 12:00 am, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, the utility of INSERT returning a unique identifier to the
inserted row needs to be addressed -- I would prefer it return the
Another possibility, given that any app using a feature like
you're barking up the right tree, as usual, Tom.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
?)?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
-- and,
you have to admit, RH's adoption of PG does increase, in many circles, PG's
credibility.
Of course, PG has credibility with me for other reasons -- it was, IMHO, just
a matter of time before Red Hat saw the PostgreSQL Light.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
actually (im not kidding here) did not
believe it could be a database if it did not require maintenance.
Can anyone say 'Woof!'?
This is awesome. Thank you, Alex, for sharing this testimonial -- your
database sounds like a serious test of 'scalability' no matter which way you
slice it.
--
Lamar Owen
of 19.
Sounds like a kernel issue.
However, the load average numbers alone are not enough information to get a
benchmark. You need to benchmark using a benchmark that can generate enough
traffic to load both machines and get good time results for the run of the
standard benchmark queries.
--
Lamar
will be when making
backups using pg_dump or pg_dumpall. You may need to pipe the output of
those commands into a file splitting utility, and then you'll have to pipe
through a reassembly utility to restore.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
and files list.
Thomas, which pgtcl problem are you referring to?
FWIW, my extant CHANGELOG entry for the 7.1.1 RPMs currently reads:
* Mon May 07 2001 Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- 7.1.1
- 7.1.1-1 RPM release
- Changes to initscript courtesy Karl DeBisschop
- pg_restore
respect a .cshrc umask setting, so you will likely need to check
permissions when you are working in those directories anyway.
Ah. Of course, Idon't use the csh :-). But I _do_ use scp exclusively to
copy stuff.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end
/downloading it.
Not counting the JDBC jars, it's a hundred K or so uncompressed. The
spec file is around 30k -- a small amount of code.
contrib/rpm-dist?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched
it in the main tree.
Perhaps src/rpm-tools/ or some such name.
Let's see where the rest of core and hackers weighs in
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
the RPM is built).
Lamar Owen and I.
Is the current snapshot available?
The current snapshot is the 7.1-1 release as of this time.
I have submitted fixes twice now for what I am fairly sure is a bug in the init
script. At least one of the posts was the shortly after lamar posted the RC3
to get
myself in gear and get it done.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
, of course.
Of course, there are many projects that DO include all the files
necessary to build RPMs from their Official Tarball (TM).
Bruce, should portions of that answer be part of the linux FAQ? I don't
want to have to write that too many times :-).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter
and ideas as well.
Sorry guys -- I got caught up in the process and forgot the people! :-(
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could ask Alfred about his lazy vacuum
patches, as they work as well for Red Hat 7 as they do for FreeBSD.
Personally, I look forward to the following note being placed into the
docs:
VACUUM: deprecated. And the feature that makes that note possible.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
mail folder 'Postgres' that I work
through for each release.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I would like to know myself. I just did a recursive grep of the entire
PostgreSQL tree and don't see it. My guess is that it is part of the
RPM. Not sure who to report that to. I know Lamar Owen works on it,
but I don't know if he is the contact.
Yes, that would
201 - 300 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
