[HACKERS] FW: PGBuildfarm member peripatus Branch REL9_2_STABLE Status changed from PLCheck-C failure to OK

2017-05-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
Rebuilding Perl and all it’s related ports fixed it. Dealing with the FreeBSD folks on what all we (FreeBSD) need to put in /usr/ports/UPDATING and / or /usr/src/UPDATING -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l

[HACKERS] FW: PGBuildfarm member peripatus Branch REL9_2_STABLE Failed at Stage PLCheck-C

2017-05-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
Looks like the upgrade of this machine to the inode64 commit of FreeBSD busted stuff. I’m rebuilding perl and all the ports to see if that fixes it. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail

Re: [HACKERS] Renaming some binaries

2016-08-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
code, no confusion because we have just one client tool - psql. Several of them have the ability to connect to several databases, some even do that in parallel. vacuumdb being one that I've needed recently to do a number of DB's in a row. -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] 10.0

2016-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
first part of the version number is only a single digit. Is that likely? That would be remarkably myopic, but I guess possible. Thom We (FreeBSD) had lots of that kind of fallout when 9->10. Autoconf, and other tools thought we were a.out and not ELF. -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Mac OS: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"

2016-02-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2016-02-10 17:00, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: On 2016-02-10 16:19, Tom Lane wrote: I looked into the OS X sources, and found that indeed you are right: *scanf processes the input a byte at a time, and applies isspace() to each byte separately, even when the locale is such that

Re: [HACKERS] Mac OS: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"

2016-02-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
) Ugh. regards, tom lane Definitive FreeBSD Sources: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin,

Re: [HACKERS] New email address

2015-11-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2015-11-24 13:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2015-11-24 13:11, Tom Lane wrote: >Kevin Grittner writes: >>On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>>>change the From header (and add a Reply-To, so replies still work). > >>If t

Re: [HACKERS] New email address

2015-11-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
e that, but perhaps those things trigger some popular antispam heuristics. regards, tom lane Any Header or Body changes will invalidate most, if not all, DKIM signatures. Since DKIM is used as part of DMARC, it's a problem. Not sure what MajorDomo2 will allow

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression

2014-08-08 Thread Larry White
I was not complaining; I think JSONB is awesome. But I am one of those people who would like to put 100's of GB (or more) JSON files into Postgres and I am concerned about file size and possible future changes to the format. On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Aug

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression

2014-08-07 Thread Larry White
Apologies if this is a ridiculous suggestion, but I believe that swapping out the compression algorithm (for Snappy, for example) has been discussed in the past. I wonder if that algorithm is sufficiently different that it would produce a better result, and if that might not be preferable to some o

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pg_upgrade: support for btrfs copy-on-write clones

2013-10-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
pply SSH access to a FreeBSD 10 system that is totally ZFS. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3)

2012-03-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/7/2012 2:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Larry Rosenman writes: >> On 3/7/2012 12:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Also, this isn't limited to CLUSTER; anything that rewrites >>> the table and indexes would benefit. Mea

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3)

2012-03-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
CUUM FULL. > +1. I think we should update ps_status as well as pg_stat_activity as all of these table rewrite processes are running. Do I need to cogitate on the code, or is one of the hackers that knows it better interested? Thanks! - -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.or

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3)

2012-03-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/6/2012 8:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Larry Rosenman > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Is there any way to get more info out of CLUSTER VERBOSE so it >>

[HACKERS] CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3)

2012-03-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
60953511 nonremovable row versions in 4224437 pages DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet. CPU 168.02s/4324.68u sec elapsed 8379.12 sec. And at this point it's doing something(tm), I assume re-doing the indexes. It would be nice(tm) to get more info. Ideas? - -- Larry Ros

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: XML helper functions

2012-02-19 Thread Larry
But by using the above code: how do we deal with multiple matching values? For example: java c++ In this case, perhaps I would want something like ---+- my_question | java my_question | c++ -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/

Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

2010-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
ion-bump? Is there a link somewhere? AFAIR, it was stated if Hot Standby AND Streaming Replication hit the tree, the release number would go to 9.0. Both are in the tree. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: l...@le

Re: [HACKERS] Sought after architectures for the PostgreSQL buildfarm?

2009-12-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
I might be able to help with: Sparc PA-Risc (HP-UX) IA64 -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 -Original Message- From: pgsql-hackers-ow

Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal

2009-10-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
ke changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >> > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Larry Ros

[HACKERS] Need 8.4 chm.

2009-05-27 Thread Larry Silvermintz
Greetings, Please help provide a chm file for 8.4b2. Unlike prior Windows installations, the postgreSQL.chm is absent. This file format provides very valuable searching capabilities. Appreciatively! --LS Larry Silvermintz, Ph.D.| Biologist & Engineer (510) 705-1432 -- Sent

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)

2008-03-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
largefiles option, per filesystem. At least that was the case on SCO UnixWare (No, I no longer run it). LER regards, tom lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 430

Re: [HACKERS] Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?

2008-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Gregory Stark wrote: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). Depends on how

Re: [HACKERS] Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?

2008-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). Depends on how big and ugly it is, I think. If you can do it just by hacking

[HACKERS] Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?

2008-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). I'm thinking about attempting it for an inside project here at work, but was wondering if there was community interest? Thanks! -- Larry Ros

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question: A summary

2007-06-12 Thread Larry McGhaw
ckers@postgresql.org; Larry McGhaw Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question: A summary "Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the case of a SELECT query that selects a fixed constant of any > sort, it would be a definite improvement for PostgreSQL to give so

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-12 Thread Larry McGhaw
to encounter this problem .. Its just been covered up by assigning An arbitrary maximum size .. So I guess we will do the same and make it configurable like the official postgres driver. Thanks lm -Original Message- From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-12 Thread Larry McGhaw
That one surprised me as well. Thanks lm -Original Message- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:00 PM To: Larry McGhaw Cc: Brian Hurt; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question Larry McGhaw wrote

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-12 Thread Larry McGhaw
t '123'::varchar(3) libpq returns the following: Pqfsize returns -1 Pqfmod returns -1 Thanks lm -Original Message- From: Brian Hurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:09 AM To: Larry McGhaw Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sele

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-12 Thread Larry McGhaw
ne out of the box. It is in your hands now :) Thanks lm -Original Message- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:50 AM To: Larry McGhaw Cc: Hannu Krosing; Tom Lane; Alvaro Herrera; Dann Corbit; Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-hack

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-12 Thread Larry McGhaw
of the 1st column in the resultset is 3 ... it cant be any more plain than that. Thanks lm From: Hannu Krosing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 6/11/2007 10:43 PM To: Larry McGhaw Cc: Tom Lane; Alvaro Herrera; Dann Corbit; Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterh

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-11 Thread Larry McGhaw
uot; postgres in our application until it is addressed. Thanks lm From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 6/11/2007 5:32 PM To: Larry McGhaw Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Dann Corbit; Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-11 Thread Larry McGhaw
e; Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry McGhaw Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question Dann Corbit wrote: > If the server bound the data as UNICODE, then it will tell me > UNICODE(3). I know how big this will be. > > In the worst cas

Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question

2007-06-11 Thread Larry McGhaw
e; Gregory Stark; Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry McGhaw Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question Dann Corbit wrote: > If the server bound the data as UNICODE, then it will tell me > UNICODE(3). I know how big this will be. > > In the worst case s

Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE foo OWNER bar

2007-04-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: When I try and RESTORE a pg_dump in the current state, we get errors because the public schema is owned by postgres, and the grant commands are issued as the user (since I'm restoring as the purp

Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE foo OWNER bar

2007-04-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Greetings, I think I found a bug, or at least a POLA violation. At work, I created a user that is NOT a superuser, nor can that user create databases. When I did a create database foo owner bar, all the schemas are set to

[HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE foo OWNER bar

2007-04-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
owner. Shouldn't everything that is in the DB be owned by the purported owner? This is on 8.2.3, btw. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: I think I'll be able to set up my HP-UX 11.11 box here, as soon as it gets fixed, and assuming either the bundled compiler will work or I can get GCC on it. If the bundled compiler is still the same non-ANSI-C weakling tha

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
r I can get GCC on it. This will take a week or 2, but I have permission now. (This box can get out to the internet via our proxy). LER Cheers, Adrian Maier -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 4

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
ing Solaris, my question is: 1) what os(s) do we need more coverage on 2) what collection of options for OS' in 1? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: It doesn't matter as far as MY box is concerned. I use VMWare extensively in my current $DAYJOB, and I want to be able to test/play with things related to that as well. The box I'm buildi

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: It doesn't matter as far as MY box is concerned. I use VMWare extensively in my current $DAYJOB, and I want to be able to test/play with things related to that as well. The box I'm building will be using the (fr

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
I might use that as the base then, since the hardware finishes getting here tomorrow. My question still stands on what OS's we need coverage for. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 V

[HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
as buildfarm clients. What OS's do we need coverage for? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2

2007-03-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
.c does fix this issue. The stats collector CPU usage has dropped from inexcess of 95% to 5% Thanks. Any guess on when we'd see an 8.2.4? I have a business reason for asking. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Ma

Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2007-02-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
I can set up build farm on it if yall need it. Its running 6.2/amd64 --- Original Message --- From: "Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: " Larry Rosenman " Sent: 2/8/07, 12:19:07 PM Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? On Ja

Re: [HACKERS] gBorg status?

2006-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
No, since my time is up in the air at the moment, I've bowed out for now. Once I get settled at Surgient, I might take it up again, but not right now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 5:42

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
info about regular (manual) vacuums, so > the above scenario still applies. They do. The stats patch as applied captures both autovacuum and manual vacuum as well as analyze (both from the Autovacuum daemon and manual). -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Pho

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
ty >>> table to see if autovacuum is doing something right now, but what I >>> want to be able to do is look through my logs and see that >>> table_foo hasn't been vacuumed since last week, or that table_bar >>> has been vacuumed 7 times today.

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: >>>>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>>>> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: >>>>>> >>

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
at it's *currently* doing, but it > doesn't let you know what has happened in the last day or whatever. > It can't answer "has table foo been vacuumed recently?" or "what > tables haven't been vacuumed at all during this week?" I added last vacuum

Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features status)

2006-08-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
I've used and use RT. It is web based for admin, but all the transactions are E-Mail based. http://www.bestpractical.com I can also make a test queue on my instance if someone wants to play. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248

Re: [HACKERS] Change in Pervasive's PostgreSQL strategy

2006-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
ted to mention, though. > > First, I'm now officially looking for work. :) So is Larry. > > Second, Pervasive is keeping me employed until the end of August, so > I'll continue posting from this email address and using this signature > until then. > > While it's di

Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions)

2006-06-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
t; a port. If we can't find anyone who cares enough about Cygwin to > host a regularly-scheduled buildfarm member, I'm for blowing it off. > What all's needed on the host for this? I might be able to use either my house machine or my work desktop here @pervasive, or one of m

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

2006-06-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
asks, the files I wrote in contrib/mac are free to be licensed any way the project sees fit. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 --

Re: [HACKERS] Test request for Stats collector performance improvement

2006-06-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
SD. This was done on a dual-xeon in 64-bit mode. HTT *IS* enabled. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3683 US --

Re: [HACKERS] That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work

2006-06-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
terday (39ms without explain analyze, 280+ with explain analyze) on FreeBSD/amd64, Dual Xeon's in HTT mode help? What can I do to further the investigation? It has 8.1.4 on it. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-M

Re: [HACKERS] That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work

2006-06-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
BLE #59: Thu Jun 1 09:40:47 CDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THEBIGHONKER amd64 $ sysctl hw hw.machine: amd64 hw.model: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz hw.ncpu: 4 hw.byteorder: 1234 hw.physmem: 4286132224 hw.usermem: 4003151872 hw.pagesize: 4096 hw.floatingpoint: 1 hw.machine_ar

Re: [HACKERS] Going for 'all green' buildfarm results

2006-06-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> Larry Rosenman said: >>>>> If I generate fixes for firefly (I'm the owner), would they have a >>>>&

Re: [HACKERS] Going for 'all green' buildfarm results

2006-06-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Larry Rosenman said: >>>> If I generate fixes for firefly (I'm the owner), would they have a >>>> prayer Of being applied? >>

Re: [HACKERS] Going for 'all green' buildfarm results

2006-06-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Larry Rosenman said: >>> If I generate fixes for firefly (I'm the owner), would they have a >>> prayer Of being applied? > >> Sure, although I wouldn't bother with 7.3

Re: [HACKERS] Going for "all green" buildfarm results

2006-06-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
y (I'm the owner), would they have a prayer Of being applied? LER > > regards, tom lane > > ---(end of > broadcast)--- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Larry Rosenman http://w

Re: [HACKERS] Gborg and pgfoundry

2006-05-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
I *thought* was already written, just needed alot >> of testing? > > I remember reading something abou this as well but the big question > is: > > Where is the scripting? > it's in an admin project on pgfoundry, and VERY lacking in details. It assumes a

Re: [HACKERS] Gborg and pgfoundry

2006-05-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
e of how each is set up, is resident in a very small minority of the folks that help run things. I have Pervasive's blessing to spend paid time working on "community" projects, and this could be one of them, but every time I try to get more information about how things on BOTH gborg

Re: [HACKERS]

2006-05-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
your table/index/relation. see the storage section of the documentation. -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.231.6597 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.pervasive.com

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options

2006-05-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Uh, it is an _admin_ function, not an application programmer >>> function. > >> but libpq is the only thing that knows where it is, and I had >> proposed a way for psql to use t

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options

2006-05-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Larry Rosenman wrote: >>>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>>> Larry Rosenman wrote: >>>>>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>>>>> Bruce Momjian writes: >>

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options

2006-05-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Larry Rosenman wrote: >>>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> Bruce Momjian writes: >>>>>> I thought about this. Attached is a patch you can use to >>>>>&

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options

2006-05-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian writes: >>>> I thought about this. Attached is a patch you can use to >>>> popen("pg_config") and then look for the thread flag to configure. >>>>

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options

2006-05-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
x27;ve proposed libpq functions to expose compile-time constants, I've been shot down. How is this different? -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.231.6597 Emai

Re: [HACKERS] autovacuum logging, part deux.

2006-05-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
ble? I.E. capture all the verbose info somewhere? Or, do people just want to increase the logging? I still don't see a consensus on what needs to come out. Do we still need the autovacuum_verbosity type change? LER -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVA

[HACKERS] autovacuum logging, part deux.

2006-05-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
or it. Thanks, Larry Rosenman -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.231.6597 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.pervasive.com ---(end of broa

Re: [HACKERS] sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1

2006-05-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
t we don't block when >>> attempting to write to these sockets? >> >> Well, we have the socket set to O_NONBLOCK mode. Whether that avoids >> the problem you're seeing ... > > A quick grep through the source code doesn't look too promising, so > m

Re: [HACKERS] patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats.

2006-05-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Greetings, > I've got a patch to be reviewed for having the stats system keep > track of the last > time a table was vacuumed or analyzed either by the user or via > AutoVacuum. > > The patch is at: > http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/pg-dev/vacuu

[HACKERS] patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats.

2006-05-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
review, it includes docs as well. Thanks! LER -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.231.6597 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.pervasive.com ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-05-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 22:38 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:18:56PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>>> Martijn van Oosterhout writes: >>>>> You know, rather than adding new columns to pg_class, why not

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: >> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:28:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> Since both vacuum and autovacuum will be cutting stats records, do >>> we want to just have the autovacuum >>> stats record have the fact

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:28:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Since both vacuum and autovacuum will be cutting stats records, do we >> want to just have the autovacuum >> stats record have the fact that it was autovacuum that did the >> vacuum?

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
ag to set that says this (vacuum|analyze) was done by the autovacuum daemon? I agree that the existing stats calls are good, but I'm still reading code to see whether I can determine at the time they are cut that this was autovacuum that did it. Thanks for the nice introductory project :)

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:18:56PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> Martijn van Oosterhout writes: >>>> You know, rather than adding new columns to pg_class, why not >>>> extend the stats collector to collect this information. &

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
or me (as a relative noobie) to do. -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.231.6597 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.pervasive.com ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Robert Treat wrote: > On Friday 28 April 2006 12:09, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> Simon Riggs wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we >>>> want Autovac

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we >>> want Autovacuum to output and at what levels. >> >> aut

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
7;m happy if we just emit that at DEBUG1 and let people > select it with log_min_messages. > > regards, tom lane I was going to make that same comment, as this seems to be more implementation detail, which should be at DEBUGn. LER -- Larry Rosenman D

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
wever, it might be cleaner if we allowed a "level 3" that made all > of autovac's vacuums be VERBOSE. > I was thinking along those exact lines. (A 3rd level). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
ng on it. LER > --- > >>> >> >> This sounds like a winner to me. Anyone else want to grab it? I'm >> in the position to try and do this, but don't want to step on anyone >> else's toes. >> >> LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we >> want Autovacuum to output and at what levels. > > I would argue that what people typically want is > > (0) noth

Re: [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-04-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
t autovacuum messages, but this doesn't say what gets logged at what level for autovacuum. I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we want Autovacuum to output and at what levels. LER -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA T

Re: [HACKERS] Unresolved Win32 bug reports

2006-04-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:06:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> It reuqires a multi-CPU box, right? I don't hav eone with pgwin32 on >>> ATM. Do you know if it's enough with hyperthreading? >> >>

Re: [HACKERS] Unresolved Win32 bug reports

2006-04-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
g up just fine on my XPSP2, PG 8.1.2 HTT box. :( LER -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.231.6597 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.pervasive.com ---(e

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" writes: >> What's the harm of a (pseudo code): > >> const char *PQgetunixsocketdir(void) >> { >> return(DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR) >> } > >> In libpq, and a psql command line switch to call it.

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
systems (since I think that the windows code doesn't enable HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS, and therefore even if the library returns a string, it's useless. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US M

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" writes: >> That's making the assumption that you know which libpq. I was hoping >> to have a psql commandline Switch to dump the info, but with your >> objection(s), I'll just crawl back under my rock. > > It&#

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" writes: >> The other issue is borked installs where the server and libpq >> disagree. What I'm looking for is to expose what libpq has for it's >> default as well as what the server is using. There is currently no &g

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> pg_config would seem to be the appropriate place, not libpq nor >>> psql. > >> The issue is what psql (and any libpq using program) is going to use >> to find the UNIX socket. &

Re: [HACKERS] How are tables stored fisically in HD?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Bruno Cassol wrote: > Hi, my teacher want's me to find out and explain how PgSQL stores > data fisically! I've done searches but could not find it. Please help > me! > Read the docs. It's all in there. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 14:07, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Greetings, >> After helping a user on irc, I was wondering if there would be >> any objection to my making a patch that would: >> >> 1) expose DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libp

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 1) expose DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq call >> 2) add this information to the psql --version output (or some other >> switch, I'm agnostic). > > pg_config would seem to be the a

[HACKERS] Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
some distro changes it, and you then overwrite parts of it, it would be useful for diagnostics. Comments? LER -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.231.6597 Email: [

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >