On 17/11/2011, at 1:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Not sure about the log line, but allowing pgstattuple to distinguish
between recently-dead and quite-thoroughly-dead seems useful.
On 18/11/2011, at 10:44 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Royce Ausburn royce...@inomial.com wrote:
Thanks for the discussion so far all. Would it be worthwhile to make
another patch that addresses the points from Yeb's reviews? It's not
sounding like
The patch applies cleanly to the current git master and is in context diff format.The patch fails the regression tests because it is outputting new DETAIL line which four of tests aren't expecting. The tests will need to be updated.Functionality:The patch works as advertised. An insert or update
On 16/11/2011, at 2:05 AM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On 2011-10-05 00:45, Royce Ausburn wrote:
Attached is v2 of my patch that doesn't update CATALOG_VERSION_NO. I've
also fixed the name of an argument to pgstat_report_vacuum which I don't
think was particularly good, and I've replace the word
On 16/11/2011, at 8:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar nov 15 12:16:54 -0300 2011:
I guess this is a dumb question, but why don't we
Personally I think some log output, done better, would have been more useful
for me at the time. At the time I was trying to diagnose an ineffective
vacuum and postgres' logs weren't giving me any hints about what was wrong.
I turned to the mailing list and got immediate help, but I
On 16/11/2011, at 12:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Royce Ausburn royce...@inomial.com wrote:
Personally I think some log output, done better, would have been more
useful for me at the time. At the time I was trying to diagnose an
ineffective vacuum
On 18/10/2011, at 1:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:30 PM, desmodemone desmodem...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems an Oracle bug not Postgresql one!
I don't think it's a bug for it to work. It'd probably work in
PostgreSQL too, if you inserted (2) first and then (1). It's just
Hi all,
I wonder, could the recent work on index only scans pave the way for auto
clustered tables? Consider a wide, mostly insert table with some subset of
columns that I'd like to cluster on. I'm after locality of tuples that are
very frequently fetched together, but not keen on the
On 08/10/2011, at 1:56 AM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
Attach is v2 of the patch.
Mixed notation now raises an error.
In contrast with what I said above, named parameter related errors are thrown
before any syntax errors. I tested with raising syntax errors first but the
resulting code was a
On 11/10/2011, at 11:38 PM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
Declaration of cursors with named parameters is already part of PostgreSQL
(so it is possible to use the parameter names in the cursor query instead of
$1, $2, etc.) and it also already documented with an example, just a few
lines above the
Initial Review for patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00744.php
Submission review
The patch is in context diff format and applies cleanly to the git master. The
patch includes an update to regression tests. The regression tests pass. The
patch does not include
Forgive my ignorance -- do I need to be doing anything else now seeing as I
started the review?
On 07/10/2011, at 7:15 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2011/10/6 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David E. Wheeler
On 04/10/2011, at 11:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Royce Ausburn royce...@inomial.com wrote:
- I'm not sure if I'm supposed to update CATALOG_VERSION_NO in catalog.h.
In this patch I have.
Generally that is left to the committer, as the correct value depends
On 28/09/2011, at 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Royce Ausburn's message of mar sep 27 21:28:26 -0300 2011:
Tom's suggestion looks like it's less trivial that I can do just yet, but
I'll take a look and ask for help if I need it.
Hi all,
I spent a bit of today diagnosing a problem where long held transactions were
preventing auto vacuum from doing its job. Eventually I had set
log_autovacuum_min_duration to 0 to see what was going on. Unfortunately it
wasn't until I tried a VACUUM VERBOSE that I found there were dead
if this feature isn't really worthwhile.
Tom's suggestion looks like it's less trivial that I can do just yet, but I'll
take a look and ask for help if I need it.
Cheers!
--Royce
On 28/09/2011, at 4:42 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Royce Ausburn royce...@inomial.com wrote:
As this is my
17 matches
Mail list logo
