Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes.
This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
--
Greg Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copeland Computer Consulting
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Ian Barwick [EMAIL
Added to TODO.
---
Greg Copeland wrote:
Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes.
This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
--
Greg Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(crossposting to hackers)
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 00:47, Tom Lane wrote:
In the next protocol version update (hopefully 7.4) I would like to see
the basic version string (eg, "7.3.1" or "7.4devel") delivered to the
client automatically during connection startup and then
Ian Barwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads
in the pghackers archives over the last year
Ian Barwick writes:
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 00:47, Tom Lane wrote:
In the next protocol version update (hopefully 7.4) I would like to see
the basic version string (eg, 7.3.1 or 7.4devel) delivered to the
client automatically during connection startup and then available from a
(no followup to [EMAIL PROTECTED], getting a little OT there)
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 16:54, Lee Kindness wrote:
Ian Barwick writes:
Something along the lines of
char *PQversion(const PGconn *conn) ?
Probably:
int PQversion(const PGconn *conn)
Tom Lane wrote:
Ian Barwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads
in the pghackers
