At 2013-07-12 16:25:14 -0700, jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the reviewer of a performance patch should do some independent
testing of the performance, to replicate the author's numbers; and
hopefully with a few different scenarios.
You're quite right. I apologise for being lazy; doubly
At 2013-07-13 14:19:23 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The timings above are with both xid_in_snapshot_cache.v1.patch and
cache_TransactionIdInProgress.v2.patch applied
For anyone who wants to try to reproduce the results, here's the patch I
used, which is both patches above plus some typo
At 2013-07-11 17:47:58 -0700, j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
So, where are we with this patch, then?
It's ready for committer.
-- Abhijit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
At 2013-07-10 09:47:34 -0700, j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back
to needs review.
The original submission (i.e. the message linked from the CF page)
On 07/10/2013 10:09 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2013-07-10 09:47:34 -0700, j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back
to needs review.
The original submission (i.e. the message linked from the CF page)
includes test results that
On 07/08/2013 10:11 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 06/23/2013 09:43 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
(Cc: to pgsql-performance dropped, pgsql-hackers added.)
At 2013-05-06 09:14:01 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
New version of patch attached which fixes a few bugs.
I read the patch, but only
At 2013-07-10 09:47:34 -0700, j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back
to needs review.
The original submission (i.e. the message linked from the CF page)
includes test results that showed a clear performance improvement.
Here's an
On 06/23/2013 09:43 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
(Cc: to pgsql-performance dropped, pgsql-hackers added.)
At 2013-05-06 09:14:01 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
New version of patch attached which fixes a few bugs.
I read the patch, but only skimmed the earlier discussion about it. In
(Cc: to pgsql-performance dropped, pgsql-hackers added.)
At 2013-05-06 09:14:01 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
New version of patch attached which fixes a few bugs.
I read the patch, but only skimmed the earlier discussion about it. In
isolation, I can say that the patch applies cleanly
