Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
Time for the annual update of this list:
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/bios
Here's the list of people I gleaned from the release notes (btw, if people
have countries for the folks who aren't attributed, I'd appreciate them).
Of course, there are many
Dave Page wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
Time for the annual update of this list:
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/bios
Here's the list of people I gleaned from the release notes (btw, if people
have countries for the folks who aren't attributed, I'd appreciate them).
Of course, there
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
yeah well - the release notes do not make that good a reference on the
who submitted patches question anyway because the do not contain stuff
that are mere compile failures or add support for additional
platforms/cleanups) of new features (ie my patches to add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:46:36 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should also point out that the contributor list has always included
people who have contributed to non-core community projects in the past
as well - psqlODBC, the JDBC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:58:27 +
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All,
Time for the annual update of this list:
...
Greg Stark, USA
I'm not sure
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Not to mention there don't seem to be any defined rules. I asked Berkus
and his reply was, It has always been a little fuzzy. I asked Devrim
and he gave me 5 bullet points that don't quite make sense.
Not sure what Devrim is referring to, but most often in the past Rob
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:58:27 +
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All,
Time for the annual update of this list:
...
Greg Stark, USA
I'm not sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we've previously agreed (in -core) that we do not want to
list committers for various reasons. Yeah, I know the list isn't too
hard to figure out, but we don't want to
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or mayber
the web/infrastructure team.
Define Hacker. And I could argue that some are members of PGDG.
Says he who only the other day
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:53:43 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or
mayber the
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:53:43 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or
mayber the web/infrastructure team.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:34:57 +0100
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that seems reasonable.
Core
Regular contributors
Occasional contributors
Past contributors
Core and Regular should be on the same page.
Occasional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:52 -0500
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Committers -- this is obvious the only question is it only
committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing to
the -www
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:34 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't generally add anybody who just provides a single patch, ever.
They go in the release notes, but we only add people who've been around
for a while to this list at all.
I'm not
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:52 -0500
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Committers -- this is obvious the only question is it only
committers to the source tree or do we want to give
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Committers -- this is obvious the only question is it only
committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing to
the -www guys (I think yes to equal billing)
I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers and
www maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:33:52 -0600
Kevin Grittner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:34 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't generally add anybody who just provides a single
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:50:02 -0500
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are being overly sensitive. I never suggested otherwise. I simply
suggested that the roles people do in fact play should be public.
And I was only pointing to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 08:20:04 -0800 Joshua D. Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Core -- this is obvious
Committers -- this is obvious the only question is it only
committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:06:58 -0400
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 08:20:04 -0800 Joshua D. Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Core -- this is
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 08:20:04 -0800 Joshua D. Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Core -- this is obvious
Committers -- this is obvious the only question is it only
committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing to
the -www guys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:16:16 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the reason we don't publicize who is a committer is that
we have non-committers who do a lot more for the project. Commit
rights are usually given to
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers
and www maintainers should be identified separately.
Why? Then we have to also separate advocacy which is just as important
and pgfoundry... as well as possibly a host of
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers
and www maintainers should be indentified separately.
Why? Then we have to also separate advocacy which is just as important
and pgfoundry... as well as possibly a host of others. We all have our
job
Dave,
Hiroshi Saito has made a number of smaller but important contributions
this cycle.
Thanks. I was being surprised to see only one Japanese contributor this
cycle.
Heikki is from Finland, but currently living in the UK.
Thanks!
You also missed my name despite it being attributed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:08:36 -0800
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Time for the annual update of this list:
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/bios
Here's the list of people I gleaned from the release notes (btw, if
people have
26 matches
Mail list logo
