On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:33 AM, David Steele wrote:
>> On 9/18/17 7:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:14 AM, David Steele wrote:
On 8/31/17 11:56 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Here is an updated patch wi
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:33 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 9/18/17 7:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:14 AM, David Steele wrote:
>>> On 8/31/17 11:56 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Here is an updated patch with refreshed documentation, as a result of
449338c which w
On 9/18/17 7:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:14 AM, David Steele wrote:
>> On 8/31/17 11:56 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Here is an updated patch with refreshed documentation, as a result of
>>> 449338c which was discussed in thread
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/messag
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:14 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 8/31/17 11:56 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Here is an updated patch with refreshed documentation, as a result of
>> 449338c which was discussed in thread
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d4d951b9-89c0-6bc1-b6ff-d0b2dd5a8...@pgmaste
Hi Michael,
On 8/31/17 11:56 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Here is an updated patch with refreshed documentation, as a result of
> 449338c which was discussed in thread
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d4d951b9-89c0-6bc1-b6ff-d0b2dd5a8...@pgmasters.net.
> I am just outlining the fact that a
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Masahiko Sawada
>> wrote:
>>> Thank you for the patch. Regarding to creating the backup history file
>>> on stanbys, is there any difference fr
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Masahiko Sawada
> wrote:
>> Thank you for the patch. Regarding to creating the backup history file
>> on stanbys, is there any difference from the patch posted on earlier
>> thread?
>
> That's a rebased ve
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Thank you for the patch. Regarding to creating the backup history file
> on stanbys, is there any difference from the patch posted on earlier
> thread?
That's a rebased version on top of what has been applied, except that
I have fixed an i
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the recent thread related to a bug in pg_stop_backup when waiting
> for WAL segments to be archived, it has been mentioned that it would
> be nice to get backup history files generated as well on standbys:
> https://www.postg
Hi all,
In the recent thread related to a bug in pg_stop_backup when waiting
for WAL segments to be archived, it has been mentioned that it would
be nice to get backup history files generated as well on standbys:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+Tgmobh3=quCzugFP5yA3-z5uzz=YKZ7arnoApJoPN7=0
10 matches
Mail list logo
