Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>> Josh Berkus wrote:
> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
> change the name of pg_
On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its incons
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
> >> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
> >> client utils? No?
> >
>
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
>> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
>> client utils? No?
>
> There are others who think this has already happened.
>
We
Josh Berkus wrote:
> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
> client utils? No?
There are others who think this has already happened.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com
On 05/20/2014 08:48 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
client utils? No?
This thread, perhaps??
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130923084634.ga15...@awork2.an
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
client utils? No?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To ma
