Marko Karppinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But in my opinion, if system() is fixed in 10.2.6, you can require
> Jaguar users to upgrade to that version for 7.4.
[shrug] If there were any need to, I'd do so. But we have no evidence
of any trouble caused by the system() hack in 10.2, so I think
On 8 Nov 2003, at 22:19, Tom Lane wrote:
After fixing the ps_status problems, I cannot observe any problem, with
or without system.c. However, I agree that it's a bad idea to
propagate
that hack forward when it's no longer needed. I've #ifdef'd out
system.c for OS X 10.3 and later. (I was tempt
On Nov 8, 2003, at 3:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
* I ditched the system.c hack, assuming Apple has fixed them by 10.3
--
because it breaks tcl and python if you do.. I did:
After fixing the ps_status problems, I cannot observe any problem, with
or without syste
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * I ditched the system.c hack, assuming Apple has fixed them by 10.3 --
> because it breaks tcl and python if you do.. I did:
After fixing the ps_status problems, I cannot observe any problem, with
or without system.c. However, I agree that it's a bad
On Nov 8, 2003, at 1:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Nov 8, 2003, at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
As for getting rid of system.c, I am not eager to do that since it
would
certainly break compatibility with OS X 10.1. We could conditionally
compile it out perhaps. D
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 8, 2003, at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As for getting rid of system.c, I am not eager to do that since it
>> would
>> certainly break compatibility with OS X 10.1. We could conditionally
>> compile it out perhaps. Do you know what #define symbol
On Nov 8, 2003, at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Nov 8, 2003, at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I have just in the past couple hours realized that ps_status.c is
seriously broken on OS X 10.3.
Er... I meant memcmp.. Have you tried removing the system.c hack?
That
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 8, 2003, at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I have just in the past couple hours realized that ps_status.c is
>> seriously broken on OS X 10.3.
> Er... I meant memcmp.. Have you tried removing the system.c hack?
> That's what fixed it for me.
AFAIC
On Nov 8, 2003, at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Nov 8, 2003, at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I have just in the past couple hours realized that ps_status.c is
seriously broken on OS X 10.3. It appears that Apple has randomly
decided to start #define'ing "BSD",
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 8, 2003, at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I have just in the past couple hours realized that ps_status.c is
>> seriously broken on OS X 10.3. It appears that Apple has randomly
>> decided to start #define'ing "BSD",
> __APPLE__ is usually the only
On Nov 8, 2003, at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here's my notes on how to build PostgreSQL 7.4 (CVS) on OS X 10.3
(7B85) with (seems to be working, but I haven't really ran any tests)
python, tcl, perl, readline.
I have just in the past couple hours realized t
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's my notes on how to build PostgreSQL 7.4 (CVS) on OS X 10.3
> (7B85) with (seems to be working, but I haven't really ran any tests)
> python, tcl, perl, readline.
I have just in the past couple hours realized that ps_status.c is
seriously broken
Here's my notes on how to build PostgreSQL 7.4 (CVS) on OS X 10.3
(7B85) with (seems to be working, but I haven't really ran any tests)
python, tcl, perl, readline. I noticed today that you guys are just
about to release, so I figure I should bring this up right now. Please
feel free to e
13 matches
Mail list logo
