On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> While studying lmgr code, I noticed that there are a couple of places
> that use 1 << x to convert a LOCKMODE to a LOCKMASK instead of the
> macro that is used elsewhere. Should that be changed for consistency,
> as in the attached?
Sure, w
Hi
While studying lmgr code, I noticed that there are a couple of places
that use 1 << x to convert a LOCKMODE to a LOCKMASK instead of the
macro that is used elsewhere. Should that be changed for consistency,
as in the attached?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
use-lockbit-on-macr
