Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers

2003-10-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Regarding the NOTICE CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key checks Does anyone care? I don't. The other "helpful" notices about sequences for serial columns and indexes for unique constraints have some merit, because they inform the user objects tha

Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers

2003-10-01 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Regarding the NOTICE > > CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key checks > > Does anyone care? Probably not anymore. It doesn't give names (as Tom noticed), but at least it gave a starting point to look for them back when you still h

Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key checks

2003-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Regarding the NOTICE > CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key checks > Does anyone care? I was thinking just the other day that it seemed to be useless clutter. > The other "helpful" notices about sequences for serial columns and

Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key

2003-10-01 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Regarding the NOTICE > > CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key checks > > Does anyone care? I don't care but is a way for a beginner to understand that behind a foreign key there is a TRIGGER that have not a 0 cost. > The other "helpful" notices about

[HACKERS] NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key checks

2003-10-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Regarding the NOTICE CREATE TABLE will create implicit triggers for foreign-key checks Does anyone care? The other "helpful" notices about sequences for serial columns and indexes for unique constraints have some merit, because they inform the user objects that the user might be interested in ar