Robert Haas writes:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:02 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> While constructing a somewhat hairy query with HAVING in it, I noticed
>> that a lot of operators don't have negators, which would have been
>> convenient for the class of queries I was constructing. Further
>> investig
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:02 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> While constructing a somewhat hairy query with HAVING in it, I noticed
> that a lot of operators don't have negators, which would have been
> convenient for the class of queries I was constructing. Further
> investigation showed that while 380
Folks,
While constructing a somewhat hairy query with HAVING in it, I noticed
that a lot of operators don't have negators, which would have been
convenient for the class of queries I was constructing. Further
investigation showed that while 380 of the built-in operators had
negators, 395 do not.
