On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:10:08PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > >> Personally I think it would be just
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
> > > >> and forgot about shipping it in
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
> > >> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
> >
> > > The problem w
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Probably the biggest missing feature for the TODO is the ability to
> summarize, group into labeled sections and subsections, and the ability
> to move items around, with URL links to more detail. Effectively that
> is all the TODO list is.
Oh, like a Wiki page.
--
Alvar
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > If it was a service we could use for free, we could consider it.
> > >
> > > https://launchpad.net/
> > > http://www.sourcefo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If it was a service we could use for free, we could consider it.
> >
> > https://launchpad.net/
> > http://www.sourceforge.net/
>
> Those are a step backward ---
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is a best effort with our limited resources.
> > >
> > > Should we outsource it? It is user-facing :-p
> >
> > If it was a serv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a best effort with our limited resources.
> >
> > Should we outsource it? It is user-facing :-p
>
> If it was a service we could use for free, we could conside
Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > This seems to me to be nonsense. You've never maintained the
> > > back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway
> > > --- ie, they don't account for pro
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > This seems to me to be nonsense. You've never maintained the
> > back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway
> > --- ie, they don't account for problems discovered post-relea
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
> >> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
>
> > The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives
> > users a list of
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
>> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
> The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives
> users a list of all known bugs/missing feature
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Let's move the TODO list to the wiki.
>
> > We need it to do a few things:
>
> > o We need to be able to pull a text and HTML copies for tarballs
>
> Why? Even if we think the TODO list needs to app
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Let's move the TODO list to the wiki.
> We need it to do a few things:
> o We need to be able to pull a text and HTML copies for tarballs
Why? Even if we think the TODO list needs to appear in tarballs (which
is hardly
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > If you change the text file, I will see the CVS update and update the
> > HTML --- I will never lose a change because my CVS sees your changes.
>
> That seems like a lot of extra work that should be unnecessary.
>
> I asked before for general reactions, so I will now tu
15 matches
Mail list logo
