On 6/7/2004 2:33 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 06:20, Jan Wieck wrote:
I tend to agree with you that spurious SYNC's aren't the end of the
world. The idea of using notify to tell the syncThread somthing happened
is probably the right way to do it, but at this time a little invasive.
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 06:20, Jan Wieck wrote:
> I tend to agree with you that spurious SYNC's aren't the end of the
> world. The idea of using notify to tell the syncThread somthing happened
> is probably the right way to do it, but at this time a little invasive.
> We need more time to investig
I tend to agree with you that spurious SYNC's aren't the end of the
world. The idea of using notify to tell the syncThread somthing happened
is probably the right way to do it, but at this time a little invasive.
We need more time to investigate how to avoid notice storms during high
update act
The link you have down there is not the one on the site. All of the
links to that file work just fine for me on the live site.
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 6/4/2004 4:47 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:01:19AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
Yes, Slonik's,
it't true. After nearly a year the Slony
On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 10:32, Jan Wieck wrote:
> You are right. The "local" slon node checks every "-s" milliseconds
> (commandline switch) if the sequence sl_action_seq has changed, and if
> so generate a SYNC event. Bumping a sequence alone does not cause this,
> only operations that invoke the
On 6/6/2004 5:21 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
I have two nodes, node 1 and node 2.
Both are working with node 1 as the master, and data from subscribed
tables is being properly replicated to node 2.
However, it looks like there's a possible bug with sequences. First let
me explain that I don't entirely
I have two nodes, node 1 and node 2.
Both are working with node 1 as the master, and data from subscribed
tables is being properly replicated to node 2.
However, it looks like there's a possible bug with sequences. First let
me explain that I don't entirely understand how a replicated sequence
On 6/4/2004 3:28 PM, Rick Gigger wrote:
The link you have down there is not the one on the site. All of the
links to that file work just fine for me on the live site.
After Dave told me how to, I fixed the page.
Jan
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 6/4/2004 4:47 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
Jan,
Great ... and there is no way to modify anything on gborg ... this is
the first and last project I manage on any site where I don't have shell
access to the content.
Sorry -- we'd like to migrate you (and lots of other projects) but,
a) I'm still sick, an
Jan,
> Great ... and there is no way to modify anything on gborg ... this is
> the first and last project I manage on any site where I don't have shell
> access to the content.
Sorry -- we'd like to migrate you (and lots of other projects) but,
a) I'm still sick, and
b) we're still having perform
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Wieck
> Sent: 04 June 2004 12:50
> To: Karel Zak
> Cc: Slony-I Mailing List; PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL
> advocacy; PostgreSQL General
> Subject: Re: [HA
On 6/4/2004 4:47 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:01:19AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
Yes, Slonik's,
it't true. After nearly a year the Slony-I project is entering the BETA
phase for the 1.0 release. Please visit
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony1/news/newsfull.php?news_id=174
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:01:19AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Yes, Slonik's,
>
> it't true. After nearly a year the Slony-I project is entering the BETA
> phase for the 1.0 release. Please visit
>
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony1/news/newsfull.php?news_id=174
Jan, the link
http
Yes, Slonik's,
it't true. After nearly a year the Slony-I project is entering the BETA
phase for the 1.0 release. Please visit
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony1/news/newsfull.php?news_id=174
for further details.
Jan Wieck
--
#==
14 matches
Mail list logo
