Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-10 Thread Dave Cramer
Hi Oleg, On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote: Dave, The situation with pgshpere is so, that I think we need new developer, since Janko keep silence :)  I wrote him several time, since I wanted pgsphere now could benefit very much from our KNNGiST feature.

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-10 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/10/2012 09:04 AM, Dave Cramer wrote: So where do we go from here ? First, please note that -hackers is not the right place for this discussion. pgsphere is a pgfoundry project, which is not the province of -hackers. As I suggested, the best solution is for Teodor to add you as a

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-10 Thread Oleg Bartunov
I think Dave you fork project, I suggest different name pgsphere-2 to avoid confusion. github would be ok. Teodor and I are really busy guys, so I don't believe we could participate much, except discussion and testing. We implemented KNNGiST, you add neighbourhood search support to pgsphere :)

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-10 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sun, 2012-01-08 22:19:53 +0400, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote: pgsphere now could benefit very much from our KNNGiST feature. This is number one development from my point of view. I and Teodor have no time to work on pgsphere, sorry. But, there are some astronomers I'm working with,

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-10 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: On Sun, 2012-01-08 22:19:53 +0400, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote: pgsphere now could benefit very much from our KNNGiST feature. This is number one development from my point of view. I and Teodor have no time to work on pgsphere, sorry. But,

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-10 Thread Greg Smith
On 1/10/12 9:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Speaking with my pgfoundry admin hat on, I am extremely reluctant to take control of a project away from its owners. If you don't get any action in a week or so, you can approach the pgfoundry admins for help. In the meantime you might want to fork the

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-10 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Wed, 2012-01-11 00:43:25 +0400, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: On Sun, 2012-01-08 22:19:53 +0400, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote: pgsphere now could benefit very much from our KNNGiST feature. This is number one development from

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-08 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Dave, The situation with pgshpere is so, that I think we need new developer, since Janko keep silence :) I wrote him several time, since I wanted pgsphere now could benefit very much from our KNNGiST feature. This is number one development from my point of view. I and Teodor have no time to

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-08 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Yes, I returned from Nepal a month ago :) I've sent my opinion about pgsphere in separate message. Oleg On Sat, 7 Jan 2012, Jan Urbaski wrote: - Original message - On Saturday, January 07, 2012 04:43:43 PM Dave Cramer wrote: Well I've sent Teodor a personal email asking him if he

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-08 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/08/2012 01:19 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Dave, The situation with pgshpere is so, that I think we need new developer, since Janko keep silence :) I wrote him several time, since I wanted pgsphere now could benefit very much from our KNNGiST feature. This is number one development from

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-07 Thread Dave Cramer
Well I've sent Teodor a personal email asking him if he was interested and so far no response, so I interpret that as he no longer has interest in the project. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-07 Thread Andres Freund
On Saturday, January 07, 2012 04:43:43 PM Dave Cramer wrote: Well I've sent Teodor a personal email asking him if he was interested and so far no response, so I interpret that as he no longer has interest in the project. I dimly remember him mentioning traveling/hiking planning to travel around

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-07 Thread Jan Urbański
- Original message - On Saturday, January 07, 2012 04:43:43 PM Dave Cramer wrote: Well I've sent Teodor a personal email asking him if he was interested and so far no response, so I interpret that as he no longer has interest in the project. I dimly remember him mentioning

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-07 Thread Andres Freund
On Saturday, January 07, 2012 05:09:41 PM Jan Urbański wrote: - Original message - On Saturday, January 07, 2012 04:43:43 PM Dave Cramer wrote: Well I've sent Teodor a personal email asking him if he was interested and so far no response, so I interpret that as he no longer has

[HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Cramer
I've been asked by someone to support pgshpere. It would appear that the two project owners are MIA. If anyone knows different can they let me know ? Does anyone have any objection to me taking over the project? Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca -- Sent via

Re: [HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/06/2012 12:32 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: I've been asked by someone to support pgshpere. It would appear that the two project owners are MIA. If anyone knows different can they let me know ? Does anyone have any objection to me taking over the project? One of the owners is Teodor, who

[HACKERS] pgsphere

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Cramer
I've been asked by someone to support pgshpere. It would appear that the two project owners are MIA. If anyone knows different can they let me know ? Does anyone have any objection to me taking over the project? Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca -- Sent via

Re: [HACKERS] [Pgsphere-dev] GIST index concurrency concern

2004-11-13 Thread Chris Albertson
I expect my site to sustain something around 1000-3000 new user acquisitions per day, all of which will account for an insert into 3 GIST indices. Most people when they talk about a large load on a DBMS system talk about transactins per second. As in 100 per second Even if we only

Re: [HACKERS] [Pgsphere-dev] GIST index concurrency concern

2004-11-13 Thread Patrick Clery
Oleg, Daniel and I have both been collaborating on this structure for a while now. We are aware that GiST reads work very fast. But won't they be paralyzed when there are writes? Both of us are working on dating sites, and the main problem that concerns us is a very heavy traffic load. At this

Re: [HACKERS] [Pgsphere-dev] GIST index concurrency concern

2004-11-10 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Patrick, you didn't say us about your setup. Have you proved you've seen locking issue for reading ? Are you sure you have no any locks in your code ? Any tests demonstrated your problem would be great. Oleg On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Patrick Clery wrote: Oleg, Daniel and I have both been

Re: [HACKERS] [Pgsphere-dev] GIST index concurrency concern

2004-11-09 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Daniel, concurrency is a big issue of current implementation of GiST. But it should don't bite you for READ ops ! -hackers mailing list is a very relevant mailing list for GiST discussions. It's pity we several times claimed to work on GiST concurrency and recovery, but never got a chance :) I